User talk:Mateusz Konieczny/failing testcases

Events

I admit I haven't studied your Python code and don't know what it does, but what does "banned as it is an event" mean? In what context are events banned? Is the problem that event (Q100235738) has some bad property claim, or that some Wikidata items are incorrectly stated as instances or subclasses of event (Q100235738)?

I'm aware of the English word Lexeme:L4036 having multiple senses, but that's about it. SM5POR (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

@SM5POR: it is banned in this specific context (this is byproduct of validating OSM objects - report is at https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ ) - and in this contexts events are never expected. I will try to change phrasing for future ones Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

I see, thanks. I think I have corrected the Skyspace Lech (Q63066124) case as it was one of confusion between installation art (Q212431) (the activity) and installation artwork (Q20437094) (the resulting product); I left the old claim with a deprecated rank, citing refers to different subject (Q28091153), as a reminder or heads-up to future editors.

But in order to get this item off your list, you may want to provide a really simple mechanism, such as ticking a checkbox and pressing a "Done" button. To most editors besides yourself, manually editing your list will be considered too cumbersome and therefore out of the question. SM5POR (talk) 20:14, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Changed to "this was unexpected here as it indicates" Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

unsigned pings don't work

Just to let you know: pings don't work if they are not signed. I did not get the last one (JesseW probably neither) - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Updates

Some new example problems are now listed! See @JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: (I hope that pinging you about new testcases is OK, let me know if you do not want this) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy to be ping'ed; I'll look at them. JesseW (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing! I spend a bit of time to look through tests and prepare some new ones (@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav:) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: - some new testcases were added! Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: - some new testcases were added again

@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: - some new testcases were added again

@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: - some new testcases were added again

@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: - some new testcases were added again Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

@JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav: - some new testcases were added again Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

@Swpb: Thanks for fixing so many! In case you would be interested - I will add some new ones (also @JesseW: @Valentina.Anitnelav:) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Glad you are back to updating this -- I thought you had (understandably) given up a few months ago. I'll see what I can do. JesseW (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Just was quite busy - in future you can ping me on OSM Wiki or OSM Slack if this page ever runs out of examples Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Group failures for a subject item together?

Any way you could have your tool put all failures for a single subject item under one level 2 header? It would make it more efficient to mark completion. Thanks! Swpb (talk) 20:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)