This change of your bot was erroneous because of the ambiguity of the Czech word "překlad": szemöldökfa (Q1370517) and fordítás (Q7553). I corrected one instance but there seems to be 500+ more occurrences. I created a bot request to fix all the instances. Your assistance would be welcome.
Vojtěch Dostál
Joined 12 May 2014
Thanks for finding this mistake, I will fix all occurences ASAP
BTW it stems from my earlier mistake here https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1370517&diff=1647540140&oldid=1623073388
Hello, Mr Vojtěch Dostál, you made a mistake, because I speak romanian, but not romani, which is not the same thing, it is a different language. Could you please rectify it ? Many thanks and have a nice day ! Radu Alexandru Negrescu-Suţu
Thank you, I deprecated the information in Wikidata (marked it as false) and informed the people who run the source database.
The mistake is already fixed in the source database.
For Q121942244, I entered an English translation, with perhaps a misleading quote note "(original label)" by which I meant a label original for Wikidata. What is the best/preferred way to enter a Wikidata-specific English label?
I am not sure how unofficial translations should be added to book editions, if at all. The translation seems to be your original research, isn't it. However, if the book was really published in English, you can create a new item for that English book edition.
Thank you. The translation was my original research, indeed; it is not known to me that the book was published in English. What about adding "(original research label)" at the end of the label? Surely there is value in rendering the Czech label into lingua franca, which is nowadays English rather than Latin? Is there perhaps a guideline or policy dealing with the matter?
I think the policy is that the labels should correspond to the contents of the item, which I don't think your label did. Also I hate brackets in labels, that's a big no. You can get some expert opinion from people at wikidata:WikiProject Books
I am not asking about hypotheses about policy but rather about actual codified policy, guidline, previous decisions and discussions, etc. Your attitude seems to be that for many books (Czech or German), the English label will necessarily be empty, which I do not think is the ideal plan. I guess I will ask elsewhere after I find energy for it.
Yes, please ask elsewhere. I don't know the specific policy for books but my knowledge of general polices in Wikidata tells me that in this case, the English labels should indeed remain empty, or just copy the cs label.
Ahoj, máš tam spletené dvě různé osoby dohromady. Viz diskuze.
Hi, Please fix Q6829737. Michael David Thomas and Michael J. Thomas are not the same person. They both born in 1933 but the former one is still alive.
Done, thanks for reporting it, Mike.
Could you check if cs:Jan Eneáš and cs:Jan Aeneas are to be merged? If you merge them, it will be possible to merge the two items. Thanks in advance!
Yes, I merged the articles. Thanks for noticing!
I created category for dates of birth (P569)
What could we do with it now?
Hi, the following code needs to be inserted into the infobox code to a precise spot, to be used only if the birth date is filled in locally in Wikipedia.
{{#if:{{#property:P569}}||[[Категорија:Date of birth not in Wikidata]]}}
However I am not sure where this code should precisely go because I cannot orient myself in the infobox wikicode.
Hi. Category has been renamed since my last message. It is now
The import is here: https://editgroups.toolforge.org/b/OR/110f72576df/
However this was a one-time import, I think you should get someone to run a regular bot job.
Thaniks, but ~1100 articles remained. And there are category also for deaths https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%94%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D0%BC_%D1%81%D0%BC%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%98%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0
Who has a bot that will complete task (I don't want to always bother You)
Hi,
When there is both professeur (Q121594) and professeur ou professeure d'université (Q1622272) on a Qid, with only references to NKČR, like here, should both be kept or one can be deleted? Thanks!
Hi,
yeah, this is a known mistake. We formerly added Q121594 as occupation, but it's an academic degree rather than an occupation. But not all P106:Q121594 currently are professors by degree - the usage is quite vague in many languages including Czech.
In cases like this one, where we have Q121594 + some other occupation, and Q121594 is only sourced from NKC, I'd be inclined towards a mass removal of Q121594 from items.
Thanks, I will remove it when I see it - if you can batch remove any similar case, that'll be great.
I'll try to do it in the upcoming days.
I am removing Q121594 from occupations, sourced by NKC only, when the person has some other occupations listed as well. https://editgroups.toolforge.org/b/wikibase-cli/05e471cf7075f/
Zdravím,
u Q87982878 se mi nedařilo propojení s článkem na wikipedii (Muzeum Mohelnice) tak, aby se v šabloně objevil kód památky. Předpokládal jsem, že když muzeu přiřadím přes parametr uses budovu (Q31736337), tak to bude fungovat. Pak jsem zkusil has parts, ačkoliv jsem tušil, že to nebude ono. Teď už je na wikipedii kód památky uveden, to stačilo opravdu jen budovu přiřadit k sídlu headquarters location? Předem díky za odpověď.
Jojo, dělá to tohle "místo" jako vymezení sídla. Je to trochu hack. Ale "Uses" je příliš obecné na to, abychom to takto mohli používat.
Také díky a zdravím
I have just redirected Q120600170 to Jaroslav Seifert (Q102483); the first has been created as istanza di (P31)umano (Q5) on the basis of https://aleph.nkp.cz/F/?func=find-c&local_base=aut&ccl_term=ica=aun2016922584 which however seems to be a work and not a human. Could this be checked by the NKC? Thanks!
Thanks, that's indeed mistake on the part of NKC. In fact, "aun" authority files are for works, not for people.
I will nominate three similar cases for deletion: Q120579880 , Q120578817 , Q120585032
Perfect! And they won't be bot-reimported, right?
Nope. These were in fact not imported by a bot, but by me, when I created missing author items for a book import.
Ahoj, ve Wikidata infoboxu se nezobrazuje identifikátor pro web Sochy a města, viz např. zde Q112218240.
Podíval by ses na to prosím? Díky,
Ahoj, ten infobox je dost složitý a nerozumím mu. Budeš asi muset někoho poprosit na commons:Template talk:Wikidata Infobox