Wikidata:Property proposal/AKB48 member ID
AKB48 member ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Withdrawn
| Description | ID for AKB48 members listed at AKB48 website |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | human (Q5) |
| Allowed values | \d+ |
| Example 1 | Anna Iriyama (Q169210) → 51 |
| Example 2 | Rena Katō (Q169689) → 61 |
| Example 3 | Miho Miyazaki (Q1195752) → 47 |
| Source | https://www.akb48.co.jp/about/members/ |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.akb48.co.jp/about/members/detail.php?mid=$1 |
| See also | JKT48 member ID (P6336) |
Motivation edit
Similar to my previous request here, I'd like to propose a new property for AKB48 idol group as well, to link the associated items to their website. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Discussion edit
Comment This is needed since AKB48 is the first sister group from 48 idol group family. Fexpr (talk) 10:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Support Fexpr (talk) 10:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)- Support David (talk) 06:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment This seems to be for a very small number of people - only about 100? Do you know how many there are actually in this database? Couldn't you just use a more generic property for this like described at URL (P973)? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- To be precise, the number of members listed here is 117. I would choose the option where every member uses their own external-id property since they have their own official website page describing themselves rather than using a generic property. Best, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hello. Can I have an update regarding this request? Best, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- To be precise, the number of members listed here is 117. I would choose the option where every member uses their own external-id property since they have their own official website page describing themselves rather than using a generic property. Best, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Pintoch, Pigsonthewing: what do you guys think? I'm leaning towards
Oppose based on the very small number here. ArthurPSmith (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) - I withdrawn this proposal because I decided to use described at URL (P973) to the related items. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
