Wikidata:Property proposal/DDB person ID
DDB person ID
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Description | identifier for a person in the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (DDB); identifier same as the person's GND ID |
---|---|
Represents | Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (Q621630) |
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | human (Q5) |
Allowed values | [0-9X]{9} |
Example 1 | Helmut Schmidt (Q2516) → 118608819 |
Example 2 | Eva Strautmann (Q1230142) → 120965100 |
Example 3 | Marina Tsvetaeva (Q188526) → 118638580 |
Example 4 | Irene Dingel (Q1672499) → 111186870 |
Example 5 | Martha Nussbaum (Q235470) → 119546213 |
Example 6 | Barack Obama (Q76) → 132522136 |
Example 7 | Wilhelm Marx (Q77183) → 11873153X |
Source | https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/ |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
Formatter URL | https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/person/gnd/$1 |
See also | DDB item ID (P4948) |
Applicable "stated in"-value | Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (Q621630) |
Single-value constraint | yes |
Distinct-values constraint | yes |
Motivation
editThe Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek includes biographical information about persons, photographs, links to items in the DDB collection, and external links. AdamSeattle (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support --Emwille (talk) 00:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Crystal Yragui, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thisismattmiller (talk) 21:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Edsu (talk) 22:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Opinion Would not it make sense to rename the property to DDB person (GND) ID similar to Deutsche Biographie (GND) ID (P7902) to highlight the fact that it is still a GND ID (P227), but not every GND ID (P227) resolves to a valid deutsche-digitale-bibliothek page? --Ailintom (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think that just makes the name of the property unnecessarily more complex and to what actual benefit? Though it uses the same number used by GND, this is still a unique identifier within the DDB. AdamSeattle (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would still say, that the description of the property should make it clear that it is the same number as GND ID. And also the format as a regular expression should necessarily be changed to match that of GND ID (P227), because for example 11873153X does not match
[0-9]{9}
Ailintom (talk) 19:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would still say, that the description of the property should make it clear that it is the same number as GND ID. And also the format as a regular expression should necessarily be changed to match that of GND ID (P227), because for example 11873153X does not match
- I think that just makes the name of the property unnecessarily more complex and to what actual benefit? Though it uses the same number used by GND, this is still a unique identifier within the DDB. AdamSeattle (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I made a revision to the description and revised the regular expression. AdamSeattle (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ailintom (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I made a revision to the description and revised the regular expression. AdamSeattle (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)