Wikidata:Property proposal/LinkedIn showcase ID

Not done

Description	identifier for an official brand, a business unit, or an initiative, on LinkedIn
Represents	brand (Q431289)
Data type	String
Domain	brand, business unit etc.
Example 1	Microsoft 365 (Q89889630) → microsoft-365
Example 2	Adobe Creative Cloud (Q14636918) → adobe-creative-cloud
Example 3	Salesforce Marketing Cloud (Q5419210) → salesforce-marketing-cloud-
Source	LinkedIn Showcase Pages
Planned use	adding to items edited or created
Number of IDs in source	unknown
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/$1/
See also	LinkedIn company or organization ID (P4264): identifier for an official company, school, organisation page, or showcase page, on LinkedIn and LinkedIn personal profile ID (P6634): identifier for a person, on the LinkedIn website

As we already use LinkedIn company or organization ID (P4264): identifier for an official company, school, organisation page, or showcase page, on LinkedIn and LinkedIn personal profile ID (P6634): identifier for a person, on the LinkedIn website, I think adding those LinkedIn showcase pages would help mostly for brand item where a LinkedIn company or organization ID (P4264): identifier for an official company, school, organisation page, or showcase page, on LinkedIn is not appropriate. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fabe56 (talk • contribs) at 12:40, January 15, 2022‎ (UTC).

Support, an important property for the Internet.--Arbnos (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose doesn't seem to be for linked open data. Leads to pages without much info requiring login to proceed. --- Jura 09:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per argument above. Why extensive support of walled gardens. --Zblace (talk) 08:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]