Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization

Property proposal: Generic Authority control Person Organization
Creative work Place Sports Sister projects
Transportation Natural science Computing Lexeme

See also Edit

This page is for the proposal of new properties.

Before proposing a property

  1. Search if the property already exists.
  2. Search if the property has already been proposed.
  3. Check if you can give a similar label and definition as an existing Wikipedia infobox parameter, or if it can be matched to an infobox, to or from which data can be transferred automatically.
  4. Select the right datatype for the property.
  5. Read Wikidata:Creating a property proposal for guidelines you should follow when proposing your property.
  6. Start writing the documentation based on the preload form below by editing the two templates at the top of the page to add proposal details.

Creating the property

  1. Once consensus is reached, change status=ready on the template, to attract the attention of a property creator.
  2. Creation can be done 1 week after the creation of the proposal, by a property creator or an administrator.
  3. See property creation policy.

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2023/09.

Politics/public election Edit

--PoliceSheep99 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)   WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --PoliceSheep99 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)   WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.Reply[reply]

cabinet Edit

   Under discussion
DescriptionValue is the advisory committee to the item's head of state.
Representscabinet (Q640506)
Data typeItem
Allowed valuesinstance of cabinet (Q640506) or advisory council (Q4686848)
Example 1United States of America (Q30)United States Cabinet (Q639738)
Example 2United Kingdom (Q145)Privy Council of the United Kingdom (Q683120) (has part(s) (P527)Cabinet of the United Kingdom (Q112014))
Example 3Quebec (Q176)Executive Council of Quebec (Q2993943)
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
See alsomember of cabinet (P5054), a qualifier for position held (P39) to show which cabinet a person belongs to
executive body (P208), which is sometimes used to link to the cabinet but can include other parts of a government
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivation Edit

The existing property executive body (P208) gives two examples: Israel (Q801)executive body (P208)cabinet of Israel (Q2578249) and Brazil (Q155)executive body (P208)Federal Government of Brazil (Q5440531). But these are not equivalent. The "government" is the broad term for the executive branch, including the civil service. The "cabinet" is a committee that advises the head of state and gives instructions to the civil service. Both should be linked on a state's page, but from different properties. I suggest keeping executive body (P208) for "Government of XYZ" and creating a new property for cabinets. We already have a property called "cabinet" (member of cabinet (P5054)), but it is meant to be used only as a qualifier, and should probably be renamed to something like "cabinet membership". --Arctic.gnome (talk) 16:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Update: I renamed the existing "cabinet" property to "member of cabinet" to avoid confusion. Arctic.gnome (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

  •   Support, an important property for policy.--Arbnos (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support, I have found myself confused with the use of executive body (P208) before and I highly think this property will be valuable. DownTownRich (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment Ok, this is reasonable given that member of cabinet (P5054) exists. However one or both proposals need to be renamed to avoid confusion!! ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I have since changed P5054 to "member of cabinet" in English. We could further distinguish this new property by calling it something like "highest executive committee", but that might be more wordy than it needs to be. Arctic.gnome (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Oppose first off this is very confusing with the existence of member of cabinet (P5054) second as proposed shouldn't this be a statement on an office/position and not on a country? BrokenSegue (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I renamed P5054 to "member of cabinet" in English to better distinguish it. My proposed property would go on countries/states to serve a similar function as legislative body (P194) and highest judicial authority (P209). To link a position in cabinet to the cabinet itself, I think we could simply use part of (P361). --Arctic.gnome (talk) 17:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Lewisiscrazy (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hotel Edit

hyatt Hotel ID Edit

Motivation Edit

5-letter identifier for hotels under the Hyatt brand. Germartin1 (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

Qantas hotel ID Edit

Motivation Edit

Qantas Airways Limited is the flag carrier of Australia and the country's largest airline by fleet size. It also operates a hotel booking platform. Germartin1 (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

Organization Edit

See also Wikidata:Property proposal/Pending for approved items awaiting the deployment of currently unavailable datatypes

‎DfE Group UID Edit

   Under discussion
Descriptionschool group identifier used by the UK government
Data typeExternal identifier
Allowed values^[0-9]{4-6}$
Example 1Wellspring Academy Trust (Q85814932)"5252"
Example 2Delta Academies Trust (Q29025790)"4474"
Example 3Pathfinder Multi Academy Trust (Q122616415)"16162"
Planned useAdding to existing groups such as Multi-Academy Trusts and Federations that are already listed in Wikidata
Number of IDs in source6992
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URL$1
See alsoDfE URN (P2253)
Single-value constraintyes
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivation Edit

All school 'groups' in England, such as Multi-Academy Trusts, Single Academy Trusts and Federations, have a UID and linking to there provides a way to link to the schools in the group. --Quiettwenty (talk) 18:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

advertising agency Edit

   Under discussion
DescriptionExternal entity responsible for handling advertising for the item
Data typeItem
Domainorganization (Q43229)
Allowed valuesorganization (Q43229)
Example 1Apple (Q312)TBWA\Chiat\Day (Q10862752)
Example 2Shell (Q154950)WPP plc (Q1318049)
Example 3Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Q5260317)Ogilvy (Q1937850)
SourceExternal reference URL, Wikipedia list article, Wikipedia article for the entity, Agency portfolios…

Motivation Edit

This would help understand better the advertising world, which agency was responsible for XYZ campaigns at a given time (eg. the Fossil fuel campaigns…). A similar property on PR agencies could help Wikipedia better understand sponsored editing. Teolemon (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

  •   Comment This will be changing a lot over time. So I would be more comfortable if the property was mostly intended for items about ads and ad campaigns instead. At the very least, there should be two examples like that and only one suggesting use on items for companies might be OK. Thierry Caro (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was thinking of using date modifiers, but start dates and end dates is likely going to be hard. Even the article is kind of disappointing. Restricting to ads in a first phase would make more sense, indeed. Teolemon (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So should the examples be modified, or is it acceptable to use this property directly in subjects like Apple (Q312)? Midleading (talk) 09:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As no answer came, I'll oppose for now.   Oppose. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

administrative status Edit

   Under discussion
DescriptionAppartenance à une catégorie créée par l'administration pour donner des droits et des devoirs particuliers à certains administrés. (fr) – (Please translate this into English.)
Data typeItem
Domainélément (item)
Example 1Citeo (Q60846010)Q3047063
Example 2Q115471871Organisme d'habitations à loyer modéré (Q3356135)
Example 3Hydrophone (Lorient) (Q74844748)Q109044028
Example 4Le Slip Français (Q14594793)Entreprise à mission (Q56317876)
Example 5Association française de personnes souffrant de troubles obsessionnels compulsifs (Q28802116)Q25380666
Example 6Q109042366Q2945243
Example 7Q115469204 → habilitation funéraire

Motivation Edit

Il manque une propriété pour renseigner le cadre juridique applicable à un élément, matérialisé par la reconnaissance d'un statut par l'administration. C'est l'équivalent de ce que fait heritage designation (P1435) pour le patrimoine. VIGNERON
Benoît Prieur
Ash Crow
Thierry Caro
Marianne Casamance
Pierre André
Mathieu Kappler
Archives nationales DJI
  Notified participants of WikiProject France Arpyia (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

  •   Comment. Quid de forme juridique(P1454) ? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2022 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  •   Comment same comment as @Nomen ad hoc: and more widly, what about the ~3000 existing properties ? Moreover, except if this really is something unique to France (which need to be confirmed and proved), there should be more diverse examples. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:21, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Bonjour et merci de votre intérêt. forme juridique(P1454) est différent, c'est la nature juridique d'une organisation qui régit son fonctionnement statutaire, et elle est toujours unique (c'est écrit sur la page de la propriété). Mon but est d'ajouter d'autres catégories administratives pertinentes, qui donnent un cadre supplémentaire, et qui peuvent être attribuées à des entités de formes juridiques bien différentes. Bien entendu ce n'est pas une spécificité française et je ne doute pas que la propriété suscitera des contributions de tous les pays.
    • Exemple de l'entreprise à mission : « La société à mission n’est pas un statut La société à mission est une qualité, ce qui signifie qu’une société qui l’adopte conserve sa forme juridique (par exemple, une SA peut devenir société à mission tout comme une SAS ou une SARL sans avoir à renoncer à son statut de SA, SAS ou SARL). Ainsi, toutes les formes de société relevant du Code de commerce peuvent devenir société à mission, y compris les mutuelles et les coopératives. » (source
    • Exemple de l'opérateur habilité activités funéraires : « Sous quelle forme juridique peut-on exercer les activités funéraires? Il est possible d’exercer les activités funéraires sous forme d’entreprise individuelle, d’auto-entreprise, de société, de régie ou SPIC pour les communes ou communautés urbaines, ou d’association. » (source )

Arpyia (talk) 13:09, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •   Oppose Unless the proposer (or someone else) translates the label and description, and the labels of all examples, to English. For the record, I'm not English (I'm Bulgarian), but English has come to be the universal language of IT and related areas, so for fuller participation in the proposal, these strings need to be translated --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    There is no requirement for proposals to be in English, so I don't think this is a valid reason to reject the proposal. Wikidata is supposed to be a multilingual project and French is a widely spoken language, so I don't see why a proposal in French could not get enough review from more experienced editors (at least in theory). - Nikki (talk) 16:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tribal Council number Edit

   Under discussion
DescriptionIdentifier of First Nation Tribal Council in Canada
Representstribal council (Q7840289)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domaintribal council (Q7840289)
Allowed values[1-9]\d+
Example 1Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (Q5046353) →‎ 1049
Example 2Lower Stl'atl'imx Tribal Council (Q6693847) →‎ 1150
Example 3Tsilhqot'in National Government (Q7849662)9097
Planned useAdding IDs to Tribal Councils in British Columbia.
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Implied notabilityWikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316)
Formatter URL$1 (English),$1 (French)
See alsoband number (P2865), reserve number (Canada) (P2887)
Single-value constraintyes
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivation Edit

Reserve number and band number IDs already have properties linking them to their INAC page. Tribal councils have a distinct number/URL system and should have a similar property as it serves as a primary reference for registration data, member nations, etc. Wikiwonk86 (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

  •   Not done no support for creation --DannyS712 (talk) 01:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support Germartin1 (talk) 04:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support Ottawajin (talk) 13:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Wait Why is the name "number" and not "ID"? Otherwise, I would expect those tribal councils to be noteable. Does anyone have an argument for why the qualifier shouldn't produce notability? ChristianKl❫ 17:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Those things can be discussed and changed after that the property is created. 2A01:CB14:D52:1200:FD97:D99F:2B77:DB5F 18:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    No. One of the points of a property proposal is to discuss how a property is named. If that discussion is not finished, the property is not ready to be created. ChristianKl❫ 16:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The creator of the property proposal is no longer active in Wikidata, so maybe you should edit the property proposal yourself. 2A01:CB14:D52:1200:8C81:44BE:C31D:42D 22:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I don't know a reason for preferring either. If anyone think this property is important to be created it's up to them to argue why one name is prefereable over the other. If nobody thinks this property is important it doesn't need to be created. ChristianKl❫ 13:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support I've changed "number" (as stated on the official Canadian site) to "identification number". And I've changed "notability" to yes. I think this is an important id for anyone dealing with tribes in Canada. @ChristianKl: would you support the proposal now, and @DannyS712: would you create it? --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 11:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Vladimir Alexiev Using "number" because it's what's written on the website seems to me like a reason. If you changed it to "identification number" I would like to hear why you consider that label to be the best.
    When we deviate from standard naming I want explicit reasoning for the alternative naming we use. ChristianKl❫ 23:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Ok, changed it to "number" to mirror the sibling props "band number" and "reserve number" --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 15:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

graduation rate Edit

Motivation Edit

A university or college's 4-year and 6-year graduation rates are significant, commonly tracked pieces of information about them, commonly include in Wikipedia articles. It would be helpful to record that information here. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 20:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits
Vladimir Alexiev (talk)
Daniel Mietchen (talk)
Satpal Dandiwal (talk)
Sush_0809 (talk)
John Samuel OdileB(talk)
Simon Cobb
Mathieu Saby
Gengrubber (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Blue Rasberry (talk)
Sdkb (talk)
IbiloyeAC2 talk
Paul Jason Perez (talk)
Waydze (talk)
Pru.mitchell (talk) 21:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
María Sacristán
  Notified participants of WikiProject Higher education {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Could we change this to "on-time graduation date", so that we could use this property more generally for programs with different terms? In the US a 4-year term is standard, while in the UK undergraduate courses take 3 years. Other programs take other lengths of time. I think it is the case that 4-year is most common and this is a common reporting metric, so perhaps it is best. It could be confusing to use a general property description. Thoughts from others? Bluerasberry (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Exactly, I would also support a general "graduation rate", later qualifiers can be used for the measurement. Germartin1 (talk) 02:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Excellent suggestion, @Bluerasberry; I'm not sure how to modify the proposal (do I move this page?) but I consider it a friendly amendment.
    @Germartin1, that's interesting, and would give us some additional flexibility. It'd require a new, rather awkwardly named qualifier, though, right? If we could figure that out, I'd definitely be open to it.
    Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Please edit the proposal: change name to "graduation rate" and add qualifiers to the examples. Ideally, find non-US examples so you can illustrate with different qualifiers.
    Bluerasberry talks of "on-time graduation date", is that what you mean? For me if I graduate within a reasonable time, is more important compared to whether I graduate exactly on time.
    If I take a 1-year break and graduate in 5 years instead of 4, shouldn't that be counted as a positive? Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 08:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    IPEDS talks of "normal time", which I think is a less judgmental way to phrase it, so I'll use that. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment In light of the helpful feedback above, I've created multiplier of normal graduation time (Q117000940); I'd appreciate help building it out, as I don't know how to relate it to graduation (Q1054021). I'll restructure this proposal to be a generic graduation rate proposal and merge in the 6-year graduation rate property proposal shortly. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Bluerasberry@Germartin1@Vladimir Alexiev, merged. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Please describe multiplier of normal graduation time (Q117000940) a bit better: "metric intended for use as a qualifier with a graduation rate" describes what you want to USE IT for, but not WHAT IT IS. Eg for Pomona College above, assuming normal graduation time is 4y, then "percentage 1.5" means that 0.93 graduate within 6y, is that it?
    Since this is always >=1 in the examples, the word "percentage" is not appropriate. Maybe use "multiplier" or "coefficient" Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Vladimir Alexiev, yes, your interpretation is correct. Each institution has a normal graduation time — for a traditional U.S. university, that is generally four years, but as Bluerasberry pointed out above, in the UK it appears to be three years, and for a U.S. college offering associate degrees it might be two years. When we talk about graduation rate, we always need to decide how many years to give students before we count them as not graduating — otherwise we could never arrive at a measurement, since (to take it to the extreme) someone who enrolled in 1991 might theoretically just be taking their time and about to finish up. That's what this qualifier measures. The two common metrics in the U.S. are the normal time rate — e.g. what percentage of students at a 4-year college graduate in 4 years? — and the 1.5× normal time rate — e.g. what percentage of students at a 4-year college graduate in 6 years? But other countries might use others.
    You are right about "percentage" being confusing; I've changed to "multiplier". Please feel free to make any other changes to that item that you feel are needed. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  • I've edited the Description and Aliases.
    • HOWEVER, you cannot use an item as a qualifier: you'd need to propose this "multiplier" as a property. I searched for props named "ratio", "multiplier" or "excess" and there isn't anything appropriate.
  • But I think you also need to capture "normal graduation time", since otherwise what good is the "multiplier"?
  • If colleges report graduation rates at different durations, then the best way to structure the data would be like this, where identation shows qualifiers:
Pomona College 
  graduation rate: 0.8
    duration:      4 annum          # P2047
    has quality:   normal duration  # P1552, new item
  graduation rate: 0.93
    duration:      6 annum

--Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Vladimir Alexiev and others, hmm, do you think it'd be worth proposing "normal educational duration" as an independent property? I agree that it should be captured, but "has quality: normal duration" is more a qualifier of duration than a qualifier of graduation rate. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Support It's useful info for me. Bangbang.S 03:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reclam's Universal Library ID Edit

   Under discussion
DescriptionRUB of a work in en:Reclam's Universal Library
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainliterary work (Q7725634)
Example 1Faust, Part One (Q13221881) - "00001-4"
Example 2Nathan the Wise (Q286611) - "00003-8"
Example 3Romeo and Juliet (Q83186) - "00005-2"
Example 4Candide (Q215894) - "21725-2"
Source[1], [2], [3]
Formatter URL$1

Motivation Edit

There are about 10.000 IDs. Right now the highest is Candide (Q215894) with ID 21725. Bigbossfarin (talk) 22:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For the Formatter URL I need some help. $1 must be filled up with zeros to six digits: "5" -> "000005".
The last number (ISBN-Check-digit) can be calculated by summing up the digits:  

Discussion Edit

Bigbossfarin Galaktos Labant M2k~dewiki Mathieu Kappler PantherStrix Wiljes jobu0101 cookroach  Notified participants of WikiProject Germany

  • Just use "978-3-15-000003-8" as identifier? Midleading (talk) 11:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yeah, I think that's the better idea. It's enough to use the last 6 digits. I think now it is easy to create such a property. Bigbossfarin (talk) 11:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

‎Nigerian registered company (RC) id Edit

   Under discussion
DescriptionRC number (Registration Number), identifier assigned to a business by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) in Nigeria
Data typeString
Domainbusiness (Q4830453)
Allowed values[0-9]+
Example 1 Q106591492 RC Number"27264198"
Example 2Northern Nigerian Publishing Company Limited (Q105675168)RC Number"5089"
Example 3Ndani TV (Q105698053)RC Number "1012994"
Expected completenessalways incomplete
See alsoCompanies House company ID (P2622)

Motivation Edit

I noticed a few examples of fleet or registration number (P2802) being wrongly used for this property, and didn't have any way to improve the situation beyond removing the statement.

Discussion Edit

Project partner (xx) / Partner del progetto (it) – (Please translate this into English.) Edit

   Under discussion
Descriptionproperty to list the partners of a project or an event, when different from the organizing body.
Data typeItem
Domainoccurrence (Q1190554), project (Q170584)
Example 1Open science for arts, design and music (Q116859240)Geneva University of Art and Design (Q3128581)
Example 2Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Italy (Q119978701)Q3740930
Example 3Milan Fashion Week (Q130829)Wella (Q702674)

Motivation Edit

This property would be useful to indicate the partners of a project or an event, as the partnership with (P2652) property can only be used to indicate the partnership between its subjects. Yiyi .... (talk!) 13:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

  • Why do you propose a new property instead of proposing to change the scope of partnership with (P2652)? ChristianKl❫ 11:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @ChristianKl: because partnership with (P2652) is used for partnerships between two organizations, while the proposed property should be used for organizations that are partners in relation to a project. For example, if the event A is organized by the organization X (main organizer) in partnership with the organization Y, so X → partnership with (P2652) → Y (and viceversa), while A → new property project parnter → Y. I hope the reasoning is clear, but if I misunderstood the usege of partnership with (P2652), please correct me. --Yiyi .... (talk!) 17:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

‎ProductReview ID Edit

   Under discussion
Descriptionidentifier of a product or brand on the website
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainbrand (Q431289), product (Q2424752), business (Q4830453)
Allowed values[\w\-]+
Example 12XU (Q16823650)2xu
Example 2Best & Less (Q4896542)best-less
Example 3Mazda3 (Q911466)mazda-3
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL$1
Applicable "stated in" (Q122419233)
Single-value constraintyes
Distinct-values constraintyes
Wikidata projectWikiProject Australia (Q11036831)

Motivation Edit

Well known product/brand/business review website used within Australia. --Dhx1 (talk) 00:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion Edit

Thierry Caro 99of9 Canley Mattinbgn Samwilson JarrahTree ScottDavis Oronsay Pru.mitchell Bidgee Harryboyles Dhx1 SJK Nickw25 Danadl MargaretRDonald Nicolekearney Calistemon Eothan Evolution and evolvability REMerrick Atroche The-Pope Bjenks hfordsa SHB2000 AmandaSLawrence Rtbk Chris.sherlock3   Notified participants of WikiProject Australia