Wikidata:Property proposal/Patamu Certificate ID

Patamu Certificate ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

Not done

Description	Identifier of Patamu Registration Certificate
Data type	External identifier
Example 1	Q54165632 → 118571-977
Example 2	Q50213306 → 98058-e10
Example 3	Q54855571 → 98060-c76
Source	https://www.patamu.com/
Formatter URL	https://www.patamu.com/certificate/$1

Motivation

Patamu is a web platform that provides a service of protection from plagiarism and storage of creative works (music and lyrics, literary works, code and software, visual arts, cinema and theater, science and research, design and architecture, other type) 94.34.249.146 18:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Comment It's not clear what Wikidata items your examples apply to, can you fix this? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have provide Wikidata items for my examples. Best 94.34.249.131 07:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, they all have the same creator. Does this certificate apply to anything else in Wikidata, created by somebody else? ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course. Potentially over 100.000 creative works can use this certificate and all of them have international validity. But I don't know somebody else to show in example. 94.34.132.135 15:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Bx67212 (talk), 10:52, May 17, 2020‎ (UTC)
Support 78.13.172.155, 19:10, December 27, 2020‎ (UTC)
Support 212.14.140.2 08:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 5.90.238.13 08:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How do you search for entities there? inurl:https://www.patamu.com/index.php/en/certificate/ finds nothing, and there is no search form or full list of certificates, as far as I can see. --Lockal (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

each author is free to hide the certificate of his work and therefore there is not a list of all the certificates, in fact, each work has its own unique certificate that can be shared. 5.90.165.195 12:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I say Oppose until we get a least some diversity of examples. I'd also like to see some evidence this site actually has substantial use. BrokenSegue (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Examples deleted as they were part of a spam-series. Bencemac (talk) 09:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]