Wikidata:Property proposal/Radio Paradise song ID

‎Radio Paradise song ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Not done

Motivation edit

--Devrim ilhan (talk) 08:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

none of the examples you use are tracks --Trade (talk) 17:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to find a decent example. All pages are filled with exclamation marks. I don't think there is an accepted standard. --Devrim ilhan (talk) 17:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Music pages need a glossary and a guide.--Devrim ilhan (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What is the record label doing on this page? Isn't this the composition page? Everyone makes mistakes.--Devrim ilhan (talk) 17:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The statements were imported directly from the Wiki article Trade (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To put it simply, music tracks are entities seperate from the singles they are released on and compositions/songs are entities seperate from the tracks based on them Trade (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you give me a perfect example that uses all the properties in Wikidata? This is given as a model item on this page. But there are exclamation marks. --Devrim ilhan (talk) 11:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any errors in these? Q122912650 & Q122912668 --Devrim ilhan (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you edit this? Q123172305 - https://radioparadise.com/music/song/42318 --Devrim ilhan (talk) 11:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. For the future you should just use the Multi-track Drafting tool instead Trade (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Trade (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have added "music track with vocals" to this page. I click on the "What links here" link. Both "single" and "music track with vocals" have been added to these pages: Q74036, Q28359, Q185160. Are these pages wrong? --Devrim ilhan (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These pages are wrong, yes Trade (talk) 20:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I edited the examples. Is there any problem now? --Devrim ilhan (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It would make a lot more sense to eithwr just replace the examples remove them instead of striking them out
Did you checked out Multi-track Drafting? Trade (talk) 22:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Example 4, 5 and 6 looks fine. More important is to fill out the rest of the proposal parameters Trade (talk) 22:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]