Wikidata:Property proposal/RomanianActresses person ID

RomanianActresses person ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Withdrawn

Description	identifier for a female person on the Romanianactors site
Represents	RomanianActors (Q76112544)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	human (Q5), actor (Q33999)
Example 1	Tania Popa (Q76125092) → tania-popa
Example 2	Emilia Popescu (Q12727620) → emilia-popescu
Example 3	Monica Davidescu (Q16593307) → monica-davidescu
Source	https://www.romanianactors.com/
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Number of IDs in source	67
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://www.romanianactors.com/actresses/$1-en
See also	RomanianActors person ID (P7645)

Motivation edit

Property for actresses included in Romanianactors, a database in Romanian and English. - Coagulans (talk) 05:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

Support David (talk) 11:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One property for 67 items? --Gerwoman (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why not actors and actresses with 138 entries in the catalog ref? This is already more reasonable, because properties are not created below 100 entries, knowing that the number may increase. Especially that :

Actresses can be changed by Actors, even in Romanian and lead to the pages of actresses and actors.
Then the English pages can be empty and / or with a wrong URL. The English pages do not end all with -en.

(domain = human (Q5) (only - subject type constraint (Q21503250)))

(formatter URL = https://www.romanianactors.com/actors/$1 (both))

(See also = change existing property RomanianActors person ID (P7645) with men and women)

CHANGES IN RomanianActors person ID (P7645):

external links = www.romanianactors.com (in Property_talk:P7645)

RomanianActors person ID (P7645)property constraint (P2302)item-requires-statement constraint (Q21503247)property (P2306)occupation (P106)item of property constraint (P2305)actor (Q33999)

allowed values = [\w\-]{1,100}(?<!\-en) (RomanianActors person ID (P7645)property constraint (P2302)format constraint (Q21502404)constraint status (P2316)mandatory constraint (Q21502408))

source = http://www.romanianactors.com/galerie/ dans source website for the property (P1896)

…and the Label —Eihel (talk) 19:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

! Actresses = Actors because the site is still unsorted. - Coagulans (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

! https://www.romanianactors.com/actrite/ without men (Romanian). As I already wrote and do not mark the proposal ready for creation if there is no unanimity or if it does not respect the rules (<100 and <7 days). —Eihel (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to set a formatter URL with different parameters - "actrite"/"actori" for the same property. - Coagulans (talk) 05:45, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The information is already all included in my first intervention and your replies to the two questions can be found here:

The URL format is https://www.romanianactors.com/actors/$1 for both sexes, in Romanian.
In Romanian, the personalities are sorted, not in English.
The creation cannot succeed because there is too little entries, but the indications concern RomanianActors person ID (P7645).

Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 19:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I plainly specified: in English "the site is STILL unsorted". Most likely, it will eventually be sorted. - Coagulans (talk) 10:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ For the last proposal of P7645: @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Pintoch, Gerwoman, Coagulans: The other proposal should not have resulted in a Property, because there were too few catalog entries. We can't blame anyone because the total ID number was unknown. A new proposition in the proposition: make the last property encompass both sexes. The number of entries would be sufficient for a property. The change would not affect identifiers already registered and they would be more complete than in English. For the changes: see my first intervention above and write if you are for or against the change of the other Property instead of a new creation. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support See catalog 3348. --Gerwoman (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]