Wikidata:Property proposal/effective date
effective date
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Description | date on which a statutory or administrative law comes into force. This date may differ for different sections of the law. This may also be retrospective, predating the date of enactment. |
---|---|
Represents | effective date (Q5347252), coming into force (Q490812) |
Data type | Point in time |
Domain | legislation (Q49371) |
Allowed values | Multiple date values to be allowed; each date may have qualifier "valid for", to indicate the relevant sections. |
Example 1 | Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution of India (Q5472937) → 3 January 1977 |
Example 2 | Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution of India (Q5472937) → 1 February 1977 |
Example 3 | Forty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India (Q72980991) → 20 June 1979 |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
See also | valid for |
Motivation
editFor any statutory law, there is an effective date, on which, the Act comes into force. This date is notified either within the Act, or separately. This is different from the date of assent or enactment. This may be retrospective, or have multiple values (for different sections). While working on amendments of the Constitution of India, I am facing difficulty because of absence of this parameter.Hrishikes (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Isn't start time (P580) sufficient? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Currently I am using start time (P580) in place of effective date and inception (P571) as date of assent. I am having problems with this method. These two cannot be used as independent statements. So, I am using inception as statement and start time as its qualifier. So I cannot use another qualifier ("valid for") for start time, to indicate sections. And start time does not support multiple values. So a parameter is needed, which supports multiple values, can be used as statement alongside another statement for date of assent, and can use qualifier to indicate sections. Hrishikes (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, so this is not a qualifier, but a regular property. That makes sense then. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support David (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Spent a bunch of time working on instances of Act of Congress in the United States (Q476068) last year and this will really help coverage. William Graham (talk) 21:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Done @Hrishikes, Bodhisattwa, William Graham: please make good use of it. --- Jura 16:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)