Wikidata:Property proposal/has part part of

has a part that is a part of

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Not done

Description	MISSING
Data type	Item
Domain	item
Example 1	has melody (P1625)subproperty of (P1647)has a part that is a part of
Example 2	has lyrics (P6439)subproperty of (P1647)has a part that is a part of
Example 3	samples from work (P5707)subproperty of (P1647)has a part that is a part of

Motivation

I would like to create a parent superproperty of the above statements that define their semantic similarities. It could possibly be used in a general way in the future to link a part two items share that is not notable enough for a dedicated item. Lectrician1 (talk) 00:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Discussion

• ? I don't understand. This property would never actually be used? BrokenSegue (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

  @BrokenSegue It kind of acts as a property "class" in a way? Idk if you don't think it's important to say they are all making the same type of relationship (all grouped under one superproperty) then I guess I can withdraw? Lectrician1 (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

  Ok I get that. But I don't know doesn't feel necessary. I won't oppose but I don't support. BrokenSegue (talk) 03:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Couldn't all these examples be expressed as subproperty of (P1647)has part(s) (P527)? Sidenote: when I read the label I think I've just had a stroke. --Push-f (talk) 15:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

  @Push-f Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star (Q1058356) doesn't has part(s) (P527) Ah! vous dirais-je, Maman (Q18336185) Lectrician1 (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose very unclear proposal. /ℇsquilo 18:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

 Not done no support for creation --DannyS712 (talk) 17:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)