Wikidata:Property proposal/periodic activity report
periodic activity report edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Not done
| Description | URL of periodic report on the activity and/or financials of the organization/company. Qualify if not annual report. Qualify with P582 to indicate the year/last day of reporting period. |
|---|---|
| Data type | URL |
| Domain | organizations/companies |
| Allowed values | url of reports |
| Example | Wikimedia Deutschland (Q8288) → https://wikimedia.de/w/images.homepage/4/4d/T%C3%A4tigkeitsbericht_WMDE_2015_deutsch.pdf
|
Following the discussion on proposal: annual report and given that URL (P2699) is somewhat an oddity among Wikidata properties, here a proposal that allows to include quarterly reports, for those interested.
--- Jura 17:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose per discussion and consensus at Wikidata:Property proposal/annual report, which this is an attempt to circumvent. Also, P582 is used improperly, in the example. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)- Oppose Per Pigsonthewing. ChristianKl (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: can you explain your reasoning? Somehow I gave up on trying to make sense of Pigs oppose votes.
--- Jura 06:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)- I think there are a lot of entries if you link to every possible report from the page of the an organisation. On the other hand we can have items for the individual reports and link from those items to the organisation. ChristianKl (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: The focus is on periodic reports, not any report. Most of the time this would be annual. Obviously, the same could be said for URL (P2699), so having a specialized property makes it easier to select them. As most organizations eventually merge with something else, I don't think there will be as many as, e.g. for FIDE player ID (P1440). Hope this answers your concern.
--- Jura 05:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: The focus is on periodic reports, not any report. Most of the time this would be annual. Obviously, the same could be said for URL (P2699), so having a specialized property makes it easier to select them. As most organizations eventually merge with something else, I don't think there will be as many as, e.g. for FIDE player ID (P1440). Hope this answers your concern.
- I think there are a lot of entries if you link to every possible report from the page of the an organisation. On the other hand we can have items for the individual reports and link from those items to the organisation. ChristianKl (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: can you explain your reasoning? Somehow I gave up on trying to make sense of Pigs oppose votes.
Not done, no support for creation after almost 200 days. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)