Wikidata:Property proposal/season starts
season starts edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Sports
Data type | Item |
---|---|
Template parameter | "apertura" of it:Template:Competizione sportiva (described as "indicare il mese o la stagione di inizio competizione con wikilink (es. aprile, Primavera).") |
Domain | sports seasons / other |
Allowed values | items for months, etc. |
Example | it:Serie A (Q15804) → August (Q122) |
Planned use | import data from itwiki |
See also | start time (P580) but that would require a full date |
- Motivation
See above. @Xaris333: who is currently working on some of these.
--- Jura 08:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
start time (P580) does not require a full date. You can insert 2017 or August 2017 or 02 August 2017. Xaris333 (talk) 16:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- But you can't insert "August" as it's August every year.
--- Jura 05:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC) - Notified participants of WikiProject Sports maybe the members of that project are interested ..
--- Jura 19:02, 9 December 2017 (UTC) - Season openings are probably way too irregular to add such a property to league-type items as in the example given above. It would work for individual seasons, but then start time (P580) does indeed look more appropriate. However, some seasons open in summer and others in winter, and this is not an irregular pattern. I can understand the desire to express this in league items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- itwiki defined that value for some 1000 or 2000 leagues .. From my experience with film festivals, month indications can work out fairly well, even though writing a bot that creates and maintains thousands of items with exact dates for every year shouldn't be too complicated. --- Jura 08:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Going through the list from itwiki, there are about 1700 that could be uploaded directly. Some others need more checking.
--- Jura 11:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Xaris333, MisterSynergy: can you more clearly indicate whether you actually support this proposal? It's not clear to me this is ready. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I support the idea, but I am not yet convinced about this approach. en:Season (sports)#Seasons by league gives an overview btw. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- As always, I open to other solutions if they can represent the same in a better way. I like the alternative included in my comment on 08:09, 10 December 2017, but I don't see myself maintaining it (nor asking anybody else to do it in my place).
--- Jura 18:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC) - I support it. Xaris333 (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Xaris333, Jura1, MisterSynergy: Ok, given lack of any better suggestion or any opposition to this, Done ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)