Wikidata:Property proposal/uBio Namebank ID

uBio Namebank ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

   Not done
DescriptionThe uBio Taxonomic Name Server (TNS) catalogs biological names and classifications to help users find information on organisms using any of the names associated with the organizsm.
Data typeExternal identifier
Template parameter"ubio" or "namebank" in en:Template:Taxonbar
Domaintaxon (Q16521)
Allowed valuesdistinct-values constraint (Q21502410), ([1-9]\d{0,8}|)
ExampleSequoiadendron (Q14707792)2663795
Formatter URLhttp://ubio.org/browser/details.php?namebankID=$1
Motivation

This database is supported by en:Template:Taxonbar, but it must be manually added to the template call. Adding this Wikidata property would allow this identifier to be centralized and links to this database to be automatically included in the Taxonbar. Ahecht (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion
Ahecht, please add a motivation for your proposal. --Succu (talk) 17:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Done --Ahecht (talk) 21:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suppose we can't avoid this, but I am quite uncomfortable: this is yet one more aggregator. Like all aggregators, it has its idiosynchrasies: it claims that ITIS uses "Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) Buchh." while in reality ITIS uses "Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) J. Buchholz". If I try to find the preferred form "Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) J.Buchholz" it reports "No Results for Sequoiadendron giganteum Lindl JBuchholz" (similar for "Sequoiadendron J.Buchholz"). It adds yet another structure, again at the cost of the offered content. Also, it sneaks in the infamous CoL. - Brya (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • A taxon name can have multiple namebank IDs. E.g. bluefish (Q461432) has 167265, 267819, 267820, 2527517, 2576202, ... I don't think this is a useful mapping. Furthermore it looks like that the data are not updated anymore (see News). The WebServices is not working. So I would   Oppose. --Succu (talk) 14:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support. Used in Wikipedia. Also, our job here is to record such identifiers, not quibble about the content or quantity of the pages thay identify. 09:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits
    • Actually our job is to judge the content or quantity of the pages that are going to be included. Otherwise, we would fail to make "Wikidata [...] central storage for the structured data of its Wikimedia sister projects including Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, and others." and would turn Wikidata into just a collection of random junk. - Brya (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]