Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Aakashchandani18

Suspected related users edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Yash Gupta". Please see Q94680626 and Q96103085 Trade (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Results: They are quite   Likely, almost   Confirmed. Blocked.

However, there are other possible socks I still have to take a deeper look at which I found in the process.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vaibhu2002 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) created Q95976828. Please check him. --Trade (talk) 20:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Guptaji2009 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) created Q96205020--Trade (talk) 00:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Completed

  •   Likely Vaibhu2002, Guptaji2009, Piyushguptaa

However, the editing pattern is exactly the same, so it looks like the same user. All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 03:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mykpacc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate), 106.67.96.131 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) This is gonna be a busy day @Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Inconclusive; behavioral evidence seems to lean slightly yes. Note that many Indian names are common and used by multiple people.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why only slightly yes? And what does Indian names have to do with this?--Trade (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Creating an item on someone with the same name is not always necessarily incontrovertible evidence of them being the same.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I the hundreds of almost identical spam items speaks for itself. Anyways, i'm confused as to whether of not you declined my CU request? --Trade (talk) 03:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did the check, with inconclusive results.   Checkuser is not magic pixie dust.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 11:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 17:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 14:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 07:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and no other sleepers found. --Sotiale (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale: Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 16:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Completed
  •   Confirmed ItsVaibhuuu, BotxVaibhu

I think it has something to do with Akshat01smm. So yes, it's Aakashchandani18. All blocked and tagged. --Sotiale (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are many user accounts (Vaibhu2002 , Poplivaibhu2002 , Akshtpopli , Vaibhubot , ItsVaibhuuu, BotxVaibhu) which have been previously blocked because of spam edits , promotion and advertising . Rockpeterson (talk) 06:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Confirmed Boy20032003 and Aakashchandani18
  •   Confirmed PrestigeNetworksco and Aakashchandani18

All blocked and tagged. --Sotiale (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale, Jasper Deng: Also can you please block Prestigepopli as being very similar to the above. Thanks. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]