Wikidata:Requests for checkuser

For the place to request CheckUser access, see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/CheckUser.
Requests for checkuser
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.

Requesting a checkuser


Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
Request completed
{{Confirmed}}: Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed {{Likely}}: Likely
{{Possible}}: Symbol possible vote.svg Possible {{Unlikely}}: Symbol unlikely.svg Unlikely
{{Inconclusive}}: Symbol unsupport vote.svg Inconclusive {{Unrelated}}: Symbol unrelated.svg Unrelated
{{Completed}}: Symbol redirect vote.svg Completed {{StaleIP}}: Time2wait.svg Stale
Request declined
{{Declined}}: Declined {{Fishing}}: Checkuser is not for fishing.
{{Pixiedust}}: Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}: Cyberduck icon.png It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Checkuser is not a crystal ball.
Information
{{MoreInfo}}: Additional information needed {{Deferred}}: Deferred to
{{Doing}}:  Doing… {{TakeNote}}: Symbol note.svg Info

Please don't ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting:

  1. Checkuser is a means to choose for difficult cases. If multiple accounts show clear behavior patterns or editing type, please post on the administrator's noticeboard.
  2. Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Wikidata, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
    • Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  3. Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
    • Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated. Do not post requests for fishing without any grounds.
  4. The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses. Do not post requests to compare IPs to accounts or IPs to IPs comparisons.
  5. Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
Outcome

Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear.

Privacy concerns

If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombudsman commission.

To request a checkuser

Cases are created on subpages of Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case.

Creating a request
  • Insert the name of the suspected sockpuppeteer (the main account or puppetmaster, not the sockpuppet!) in the box below, leaving out the "User:" prefix. Do not remove the text in the box, add to the end only.
  • Please explain/justify the request by saying what it is you suspect and why it is important that the check be carried out. Indicate the usernames you suspect, using {{checkuser}}. Please do not use this template in the section header, as that makes it difficult to read the account names. Include the diffs or links required to support the request and reason for it.
  • There are people to assist you and help with maintenance of the page. Just ask for help on the admin noticeboard if you really are stuck, or take your best shot and note that you weren't completely sure of what to say.
  • If a case subpage already exists, edit the existing page instead, either adding to the currently open section (if the case is not yet archived) or adding a new section to the top (if the case has been archived). When editing an existing case, be sure to list/transclude the subpage here.
Example
If you want to request a checkuser on User:John Doe, enter the text Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/John Doe then click "Make a checkuser request". You will be taken to a page where you can fill out the request. Please make your request there brief and concise.


If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please Purge.
OOjs UI icon folderPlaceholder-ltr.svg For older requests, please see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Archives

RequestsEdit

Ananislam138Edit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both of these userrū accounts are writing promotionally about the same person. Trade (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I know that he have been deleted on WD before. If someone could tell me the name of the user that created Q88871217 and all users who edited that item that would be very helpful.--Trade (talk) 11:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

@Jasper Deng:, @Sotiale:, @علاء: --Trade (talk) 11:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
As he's the one who nominated the items @Achim55: --Trade (talk) 12:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 12:06, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Ananislam138, You not to mention, Image Verify, Bollywood actorss, Actors wikiall
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Biography verify, Verify Actors Reviwe

  •   Likely Group 1 and 2.

  Completed and blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 12:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Great job! Could you take a look at Q88871217 and tell me the name of the users who created and edited it before it was deleted?@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
@Trade: “Md Anan Islam”. --Sotiale (talk) 12:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Yes that's the label of the item. I was asoing who was editing it before deleion.--Trade (talk) 12:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Oh, username is MD ANAN ISLAM wiki. I was mistaken because it was so similar ;) --Sotiale (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay, that makes more sense. Could you check to see if there's anything connected to his old account?--Trade (talk) 12:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Looks like you already did that--Trade (talk) 12:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
:) --Sotiale (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 3: MD ANAN ISLAM wiki, Anan7860

  •   Likely Group 1 and 3.

Also blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 12:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I just found another one of his items: Q93255737. Can you look at the history and see if there's anymore accounts? --Trade (talk) 20:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
It is the contributions of Ananislam138. So already investigated. --Sotiale (talk) 22:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

He's back with a new account. Please see Q94344976. @Sotiale:, @Jasper Deng: --Trade (talk) 17:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Sadly, no another account found :( I deleted the item. Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 22:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I have added some new accounts from Q94572587. I'll like to request a CU of them @Sotiale:, @Jasper Deng:--Trade (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed and Blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 00:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Please sse Q94683085 @Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 09:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, but no sleepers found. --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Please check Anan Foundation (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Anan Foundation SUL logs block user) @Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 19:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Two more accounts found: Anan Foundation (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Anan Foundation SUL logs block user) and Online robot (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Online robot SUL logs block user) (  Confirmed to each other and   Likely to BeingAnanIslam (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/BeingAnanIslam SUL logs block user)).--Jasper Deng (talk) 11:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

All accounts are locked for xwiki abuse(spamming only). --Sotiale (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Guess who just created Q95152126@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 23:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Anan Islam 7860 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Anan Islam 7860 SUL logs block user) is   Likely to be related to previous socks; blocked.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Just had a look, no sleepers found.-BRP ever 13:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Somehow i managed to miss Ananislam (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Ananislam SUL logs block user) and AnanIslam0 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/AnanIslam0 SUL logs block user) @Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

@Trade: Both   Stale.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
I think it's fair to say there's enough behaviorial evidence to block them. --Trade (talk) 23:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Jasper Deng: Could you please check Iammai2 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Iammai2 SUL logs block user)? That account created Q96026712. Esteban16 (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
@Esteban16: This account is   Likely related to previous socks. Blocked for socking (not a CheckUser block; the behavioral evidence is pretty clear-cut).--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Please check I am Md Anan Islam (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/I am Md Anan Islam SUL logs block user)--Trade (talk) 11:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@Trade:   Likely. Blocking and tagging.--Jasper Deng (talk) 11:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Not sure what the point of copying Sotiale's userpage was--Trade (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Q96375380 and Q96375055@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 12:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Q96483588--Trade (talk) 01:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Q96761241--Trade (talk) 19:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Please check Mentrosoft (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Mentrosoft SUL logs block user)--Trade (talk) 19:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  Confirmed.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
2020 All comopany (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/2020 All comopany SUL logs block user)@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
It seems different user. Is the item he made similar to the one Ananislam made previously? --Sotiale (talk) 08:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
The last recreations of Q96970615 were created by Anan islam-blocked socks, either being linked to him (founded by) or having his name as an alias. You can check the deleted recreations of this item --Trade (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Ah, OK. I was mistaken because his information changed a little. locked. --Sotiale (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Jonson MularEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named Logan Simmons. Please see Q95579910 and Q95223064. Trade (talk) 23:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Results: @Trade:   Unrelated technically, but meatpuppetry is a very good possibility. On a second look, it is   Possible.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

A block it is then i suppose?--Trade (talk) 02:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
A third user have just created Q95683450--Trade (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
I already checked them.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please check the creator of Q96146134--Trade (talk) 00:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Thoughts on this one and the above request? @Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Aakashchandani18Edit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Yash Gupta". Please see Q94680626 and Q96103085 Trade (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Results: They are quite   Likely, almost   Confirmed. Blocked.

However, there are other possible socks I still have to take a deeper look at which I found in the process.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Vaibhu2002 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Vaibhu2002guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs) created Q95976828. Please check him. --Trade (talk) 20:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Guptaji2009 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Guptaji2009guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs) created Q96205020--Trade (talk) 00:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

  Completed

  •   Likely Vaibhu2002, Guptaji2009, Piyushguptaa

However, the editing pattern is exactly the same, so it looks like the same user. All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 03:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Mykpacc (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Mykpaccguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs), 106.67.96.131 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/106.67.96.131guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs) This is gonna be a busy day @Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

  Inconclusive; behavioral evidence seems to lean slightly yes. Note that many Indian names are common and used by multiple people.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Why only slightly yes? And what does Indian names have to do with this?--Trade (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Creating an item on someone with the same name is not always necessarily incontrovertible evidence of them being the same.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I the hundreds of almost identical spam items speaks for itself. Anyways, i'm confused as to whether of not you declined my CU request? --Trade (talk) 03:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I did the check, with inconclusive results.   Checkuser is not magic pixie dust.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Mokbul AlamEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Chris M. Walker". Please see Q96145837 and Q96024683. Trade (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 14:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Mokbul Alam, Ogimodia, Johan David1, Stepen Jonson
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Obisek Kumar, Robin Khana

  •   Possible Group 1 and 2.
  • These users used VPN.

But in my opinion, these are just the same users, because of VPN, the technical data is slightly less identified. All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Same, used VPN. No sleepers found, blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 06:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Adam Montagu (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Adam Montaguguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs)--Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Same, blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 04:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Kobir MunnaEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Abdelkader Bachr". Please see Q96609095 and Q96475071 Trade (talk) 00:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Results: They are using proxies but based on other information I think they are   Likely related. Blocked.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Kasem Ali8 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Kasem Ali8guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs)@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Carry1995Edit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Nitish Nagar". Please see Q96474252 and Q94697114 Trade (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Results: They are likely technically   Unrelated; meatpuppetry is a more likely explanation but I will not take action myself.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Would you mind blocking them, @Sotiale:?--Trade (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

PvtHudsonisBACKEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: LTA. Trade (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

If i missed any accounts, you are welcome to add them @Bovlb:--Trade (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Results: @Trade, Bovlb: These two are   Confirmed to be the same, but no sleepers were found.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

GanhhanghoaEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Linkspam. Trade (talk) 10:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Completed

  •   Confirmed Stdecor, Stdecorvietnam, Shophoatuoii, Shophoatuoi
  •   Unrelated Ganhhanghoa

All blocked as promotion-only and inserting external link. --Sotiale (talk) 14:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Should we blacklist the link?--Trade (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
I don't think we need to do that yet. Let's watch a little more. --Sotiale (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Hitesh123tEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Barion McQueen". Please see Q96743193 and Q96606844.. Trade (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Mayur1332, Hitesh123t
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Ankit7809, Ankit124
  •   Likely Group 1 and 2

All blocked as promotion-only and abusing multiple accounts. --Sotiale (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Please perform a CU of Ankit mohapatra20 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Ankit mohapatra20guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs), similar name and pattern@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
We should perform a CU of the accounts involved with Q96744270 as well--Trade (talk) 19:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Ankit45612 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Ankit45612guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs), @Sotiale: same name, same pattern--Trade (talk) 12:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

  •   Confirmed Ankit45612, Sanket7890, Rohit67009

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Found anything on Ankit mohapatra20?--Trade (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Ankit mohapatra1994, Ankit mohapatra20

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 12:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Ankit Mohapatra digitechankit (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Ankit Mohapatra digitechankitguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs)--Trade (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  Inconclusive. Let's watch a little more. --Sotiale (talk) 08:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Rani378 (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Rani378guc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs)@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

  •   Confirmed Group 1: Amit rive, Rani378
  •   Likely Group 1 and Ankit45612 accounts group

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

  •   Confirmed Rohitt 6754, Contributor568990, Harry 3453

@Trade: All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 04:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 06:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

  •   Confirmed Group 1: Anthonyhook2, Ankitrt899, Rohit1235677, Rohit Tayade RT23, Steven Correa123, Rohit Tayade RT 568, Luke lintz, Katerina Leory123, Tonylevy 456, Ajit arora7897, Rohit Tayade RT6898, Rohit Tayade26
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Ankit212, Dpankeh234, Ankitlal427, SantoshmataT, Contributor568990, Contribtour234547, Angro contributor567, Rohiit3

@Trade: All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

found these two in the account creation log.@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

  Inconclusive for now. Let's watch more. --Sotiale (talk) 13:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Rojob AliEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Willy Moeller". Please see Q96694775 and Q96585501.. Trade (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Confirmed Rohitf6586, Rohit t 6789, Anikit lal0090
  •   Possible Rojob Ali

  • Some user used VPN.

Blocked all because behavior pattern matched. --Sotiale (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

ماجد علاءEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: All are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Adrian Gartner Forbes". Please see Q96619718, Q95368727 and Q96160223. Trade (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 06:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Confirmed Group 1: ماجد علاء, Grabment
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Mohammedalalaa, AdrianGartnerForbes
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Majed3laa, Chris aka dream

  •   Likely Group 1, 2, 3

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 07:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

DatamatinpcEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Same user name, same spam. Trade (talk) 21:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Completed

  •   Unlikely Datamatinpc, Datamatinpcc

But editing pattern is matched, blocked as block evasion. --Sotiale (talk) 07:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Please check * Dataali (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Dataaliguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs)@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 00:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Datamatinpc, Dataali

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 05:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Blocked, no sleepers found. --Sotiale (talk) 10:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Would it be possibly to block this persons IP range? And would you mind if i tag the rest of the items? --Trade (talk) 01:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
@Trade: Just submit the items to RfD. I can never confirm or deny that their IP addresses were blocked, for privacy reasons.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
I meant to say "tge rest of the accounts", not items. --Trade (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Ambergandotra06Edit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Amber Gandotra". Please see Q96621180 and Q95971986. Trade (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Completed

  •   Confirmed Group 1: Ambergandotraofficial, Avnigandotramakeovers, Ambergandotra06, Jammuguys
  •   Likely Group 2: Broxerofficial, Vancefundoraofficial, Nicholasduro, Piyushdimri

  •   Possible Group 1 and 2

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 07:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Jecika SmithEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Lance Bachmann". Please see Q96335619 and Q95641117. Trade (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:

Group 1, very   Likely:

Group 2, also very   Likely:

Groups 1 and 2   Possible; quite   Likely with similar m.o.'s and therefore all blocked and tagged as socks of the oldest one. They as a whole are also   Likely related to the trio of users at Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hishanita.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Ronathon Mendela (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Ronathon Mendelaguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs)@Jasper Deng:--Trade (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
@Trade: Since they are using proxies, this is a difficult call. However, Ronathon Mendela is   Confirmed to be the same as William Staen (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/William Staenguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs). These are   Possible regarding their relation to the previous accounts. Blocking and tagging, though not with very high confidence.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Megan.riffEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Max Weiss". Please see Q96030823 and Q95689032.. Trade (talk) 22:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Results:   Possible leaning   Likely; with the behavioral evidence it's pretty   Likely. Blocked and tagged.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

HelpmechoosemlEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Similar user names, similar history of spamTrade (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Results: All of the above, and all of the following, are   Likely related to each other. Furthermore:

Group 1:   Confirmed to be the same:

Group 2:   Confirmed to be the same:

--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Question: What does “technically similar” mean? ~ AC5230 (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
It would mean   Likely if not for the behavioral dissimilarities.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Justofck123dwEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Koushik Sengupta". Please see Q96905014 and Q96905014.. Trade (talk) 00:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Kakaji997dwadwa (talk contribs (deleted) track Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/User/Kakaji997dwadwaguc by wiki / by date SUL logs block user block log interaction-timeline intersect-contribs), similar user name--Trade (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Kakaji9975dwad, Wikimasterweod, Kakaji997dwadwa, Justofck123dw, Lucifer10wda
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Kakaji997daw, Luckyguy2398
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Celemedia123, Anniprofess, Sanmitsingh, Lucifer102eq

  •   Likely Group 1, 2, 3

All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hatw0rthyEdit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: oth are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Connor Blakley". Please see Q96781191 and Q96678213.. Trade (talk) 00:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Possible Hatw0rthy, Anakinwashington

But editing pattern matched, so blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Chiragpardesi0077100Edit

Suspected related usersEdit

Rationale, discussion and resultsEdit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Matthew J Philips". Please see Q96577179 and Q96279761. Trade (talk) 01:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 05:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

  Completed
  •   Unrelated Chiragpardesi0077100, Hrk2611

--Sotiale (talk) 05:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)