Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Requests for deletions
Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidataconnect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at September 29.

Requests for deletions


~178 open requests for deletions.

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}Edit

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.


Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.


Ervina (Q15830561): Mari female given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused, previously incorrectly used, likely malformed entry. One might be looking for Q16747215 or Q9254866 or Q104713150 --- Jura 10:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[]

  • I reverted some of the recent edits and merged Q104713150. Peter James (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Эрвина is romanizing as Ervina, if matters. This is not a feminine analogue of the "mainland" European name Erwin(a), this is of Volga Finnic origin. --Wolverène (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[]
See Q991038. --Wolverène (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[]
  • @Peter James: If it's a conflation, reverting my edits wont help. --- Jura 10:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[]
    From when it was created it was stable for several years, then an incorrect statement was added that was not reverted. Peter James (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[]
    • What edit was that? I think it was mostly empty for years which didn't really help determine what it was about. --- Jura 07:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[]
@Jura1, Peter James, Wolverène:   Resolved This seems to have moved from a deletion request into a content dispute and then settled down. Please reopen if deletion is still indicated. Bovlb (talk) 20:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[]
  • @Bovlb: It's still a conflation for which we have correctly formed items. Accordingly, the reminder should be deleted. If we keep/use this, it's unclear what name it actually refers or referred to. Wikidata aims to provide stable identifiers, not some that are repurposed into whatever people need at some point in time. --- Jura 06:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[]
  • @Jura1: I don’t really understand why you created Ervina (Q104713150). It corresponds 1:1 to the original meaning of Ervina (Q15830561) as evidenced by the first version. I don’t see why later erroneous edits could create a conflation that wasn’t there when the item was first created. Just merge Ervina (Q104713150) back to Ervina (Q15830561). --Emu (talk) 10:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    • I don't see how an almost blank item from 2014 has any relevancy. Conflation can happen gradually. Help:Conflation_of_two_people tries to explain how to sort it out (for a slightly different topic). --- Jura 11:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[]
      • It matters because it precisely shows what this item is supposed to be about. As to conflation that can happen gradually: Maybe, but there’s a difference between conflation and faulty edits. --Emu (talk) 22:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]
        • Do you have anything to support this view? i.e. that item should be about what a sitelink years ago may be been about (and not about whatever its statements and description state)? If not, let's stick to Help:Conflation_of_two_people --- Jura 08:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]
          • @Jura1: No offense, but we have been stuck with this RfD for more than half a year. People have tried to close this discussion by merging several times only to be frustrated by your interpretation of the 2018 page Help:Conflation of two people you created yourself (it has no official status other than it has been discussed a few years ago on WD:PC). Might I suggest that this page no longer reflects current practice? --Emu (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  • We don't have page either that says items shouldn't be repurposed, despite that being a key points of Wikidata. There seems to be consensus that there are indeed several names to be considered for which we should have items. It's clear that somehow this page leads people to merge items despite Help:Merging or Help:Conflation of two people advising people of the contrary. If there isn't really anything to support the merger, what are we trying to gain by insisting on it? --- Jura 11:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    • Well, there’s a lot to support the merger. You just don’t accept those arguments. --Emu (talk) 11:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    • I just see one (+you) and the person didn't even bother to explain it. It's really bad practice to merge items when an experienced user lists them here. Besides, mergers need to comply with Help:Merge. --- Jura 08:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Mahmood Nouri (Q104883020): Iranian film editor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 08:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[]
  • I doubt we need the associated items, but one of them has a commons category. If you want to delete all of them, we need to take care of that too. Quakewoody (talk) 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep He is the editor of many famous Iranian Films. 08:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Like I said, I don't think any of the connected items pass notability either. Quakewoody (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep his works on IMDB: Eliseriot (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[]

  • That wasn't the same IMDb link that was originally listed. It makes me question the authenticity of either. Quakewoody (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete You should add references. Imdb profile by it self cannot represent the item as notabe. Wikidata needs references. if you fail to add references it will be removed.--WMEOIRHGU (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete Not notable. Wikicheshmeh (talk) 07:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

English adjectives insubordinately imported by GZWDer (flood)Edit

The import was done in nov 2020. None of these items make any sense and the source WordData seems bogus/unreliable when it comes to adjectives. See the example adjective reasoning (L339763) which is not found in other dictionaries.

We who edit lexemes would like others to first seek approval before mass editing or adding lexemes because we have seen that there are many things that can go wrong.

All items are here: CC @Nikki, GZWDer:--So9q (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[]

I am going to check other dictionaries and please wait for some time.--GZWDer (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@So9q: Minus entries found in English Wiktionary, 1124 left (this is still not do be deleted for now, as I am going to filter it further).--GZWDer (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[]
  Wait leaning toward   Delete (given that on Wikidata talk:Lexicographical data the discussion went mostly nowhere...). All of this import are useless right now and most of them are not truly lexemes (being in a dictionary - Wiktionary or not - is not enough to be a Lexemes), at the very least a *lot* of cleaning is needed. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@VIGNERON: The category I compared with is wikt:Category:English adjectives, which contains only lexeme (at least in Wiktionary's POV). Previously there are a number of English adverbs imported from Wiktionary, and they does not seems more reliable than 7315 (=8439-1124) adjectives matched.--GZWDer (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@GZWDer: no, it obviously does not. Right at the beggining, I see 0D and 0d which is the same lexeme (not even by Wiktionary's POV, the second one explicitely says it the same lexeme as the first!). And just because other data are bad is not an excuse at all to add more bad data. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@VIGNERON: I'm not planning to add more (without a discussion first), but previously there're some large import from Wiktionary, see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/SixTwoEightBot.--GZWDer (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@GZWDer: yes there was a lot of import ; this specific import was a bit poor but it seems to be mostly good. Sorry to be blunt but yours is mostly bad. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@VIGNERON: My comment above said there are 7315 entries found in English Wiktionary and 1124 not found. Should we only focus on the latter?--GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@GZWDer: not sure to understand and we should focus and having good data (with a good source - en.wikt alone is not ideal, it should be cross-referenced with an other source - and a good data processing - for example adding at least one form). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@VIGNERON: one of 19191 adverbs imported from Wiktionary and one of 7315 adjectives imported from WordData that may be found in Wiktionary. I think the only problematic thing is 1124 adjectives that can not be found in Wiktionary.--GZWDer (talk) 17:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Maybe this other import from the wiktionary should also be deleted then. VIGNERON (talk) 17:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Yes, I really hate using Wiktionary as a source (it is user-generated), but other sources may be not much better. Before importing a source, some discussion in Lexeme project talk page may be required.--GZWDer (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@GZWDer: the best solution, especially for lexemes, is to cross multiple sources (timeo hominem unius libri). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Yeah there are a number of sources in the Internet, but 1. published dictionary often does not contain machine-readable part of speech information and 2. other online database may be not reliable.--GZWDer (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[]

I'm curious what @SixTwoEight: thinks about their import and a possible deletion suggestion for that. I very recently wrote a best practice about referencing at least one form and the import from SixTwoEight does not seem to follow that (feel free to support, oppose or comment in the page with best practices so we can move forward as a community).--So9q (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[]

@So9q: Just checked, it looks like my bot imports do have forms but they are unreferenced (see for instance L204117). I do think that it's a good idea to add referenced forms to bot-imported lexemes. I will see if I can add references to those adverbs I imported. (there is the minor issue that the reference should really be for the lexeme, not the form, but since that's not possible referencing a form should be close enough) --SixTwoEight (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Thanks a bunch for your reply. :) Do you want help adding references? I made Wikidata:LexUse recently and if I tweak it a little and add Wikisource we could easily add a lot of references semi-automatically. Feel free to discuss in the github repo and open issues.--So9q (talk) 05:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[]
@So9q: Can we close this request now? Bovlb (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[]
@Bovlb: No. GZWDer added sources to some which is nice :) but these 2700 are still missing a source/reference (other than the bogus one that was imported). IMO sources need to be provided or we should delete them. I am planning to write a tool to check for examples in Wikisource and that could probably help finding references to works where the word is used. A corpora of all Gutenberg English texts would be nice also to look up in if anyone has made that yet. @SixTwoEight, GZWDer: about making a corpora or helping out with a wikisource tool.--So9q (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[]
@So9q, SixTwoEight, GZWDer: 2 month later, it seems we're still at the same point. Is there anything that can be done and should we delete the 2700 lexemes left? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]
@VIGNERON: I'll try to hack on LexUse/LexUtils and add Wikisource support within a week or two. That could hopefully yield some references/sources. IMO we are not in a rush here really. As a sampling I just did a quick search for for absentminded (L334208) and the third result contains "Prose is poetry without knowing it; it is as if an absentminded poet always said good morning in metre, or asked us to pass the potatoes in impromptu and unconscious rhyme." where it is used as an adjective to the best of my judgement so I added it as an example Interestingly enough the Q-item for the book was created by GZWDer and had no statements so I improved that a little too.--So9q (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Wikimedia set category (Q59542487): use with 'instance of' (P31) for wiki categories that define a set of articles defined by a set of common types and properties. (e.g. 'Planetary scientists' (Q8764963), 'Films set in the 1660s' (Q25308979), etc.): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Seems we missed this one when doing the other at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/11/25#Q59541917 --- Jura 17:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  • @Lymantria: you closed the earlier nomination --- Jura 15:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[]


Wikimedia topic category (Q59541917): use with 'instance of' (P31) for wiki categories that group items related to particular topic (person, place, event, history of _, etc.) but children do not necessarily share a set of properties: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Seems this was restored despite the earlier deletion discussion --- Jura 15:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[]

Yes, I noticed that. Perhaps the benefits or not should be discussed in an RfC. Lymantria (talk) 15:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[]
This should not be decided on this page, when practically only a few editors would comment. The distinction of different categories is more common that e.g. Wikimedia set index article (Q15623926) and Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) which — not surprisingly as this is an idea — is not contested. Wostr (talk) 13:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  • I think we could just implement the deletion that was decided. --- Jura 16:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[]

@Jura1, Lymantria, Wostr: This discussion has been open for months. The items are still linked by many, many other items which suggests WD:N #3 notability. I don’t really care about the merits of the different types of category items, but I don’t really understand why we are discussing this in this forum. I would just close it here, WD:PC or a RfC would be a better place to discuss this. --Emu (talk) 22:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  • I thought it was bad practice to remove links prior to listing them for deletion, isn't it? --- Jura 22:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
    • It should be interesting if somehow one of the other admins would take a decision here. I decided in a similar case for deletion, I will hence not close this request as {{Not deleted}}. But I am open for a good discussion in an RfC as I suggested. Lymantria (talk) 05:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]


forest NW Gundauyang (Q25103690): place in Kachin State, Myanmar: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

This ID should be deleted if we consider to be original research. But don't redirect it to Q17025472. -- 04:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]

  • @SCP-2000: 我對是否刪除這個item持中立(Neutral)態度,不過如果您覺得是原創研究的話就來此投刪除票吧。不知Wikidata的官方語言是什麼-- 04:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
    另外將Talk:Q25103690裡的詳細理由粘貼至此:「保留Q25103690的目的是留下一個指向GeoNames ID 1317999的item並闡明昆馬(Q17025472)與指向GeoNames ID 1317999的item不同,以防參考了Wikidata的數據庫(如Google知識圖譜)錯誤地將昆馬與GeoNames ID 1317999聯繫起來。至於GeoNames ID 1317999是否合理那不是Wikidata要考慮的問題。您這樣重定向可能會導致外部數據庫混亂的,如果想刪除這條數據請直接刪除,不要重定向至Q17025472。」-- 04:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete: per IP's comment which stated that forest NW Gundauyang (Q25103690) should not be merged to Kunma (Q17025472) since they are not the same and has a different GeoNames ID. (Note: The IP requested this item to be deleted after User:SCP-2000 merged the item to Kunma (Q17025472) and was reverted by IP.) However, the item currently neither is supported by reliable sources nor has a sitelink, so it doesn't meet WD:N. Sun8908 💬 10:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Comment: GeoNames ID 1317999 is about Kunma (Q17025472) since it is linked to the article of Kunma, although the coordinate is different from the coordinate that mentioned in the article. The problem of Original research and Notability can be solved by reverting to this revision. --SCP-2000 (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
    @SCP-2000: 問題在與GeoNames ID 1317999並非關於Kunma (Q17025472),也並沒有“linked to the article of Kunma”。請閱讀w:en:Talk:Kunma, Myanmar後再行論斷「GeoNames ID 1317999 is about 昆馬(Q17025472)」。奇怪Wikidata不是多語言的嗎怎麼大家全說英語呢?-- 03:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
    GeoNames ID 1317999 is linked to the article of Kunma clearly [1]. Also data of the class (i.e. town) and the country (i.e. Myanmar) in Kunma (Q17025472) and GeoNames are the same. Based on above evidences, GeoNames ID 1317999 is about Kunma (Q17025472). --SCP-2000 (talk) 05:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
    老兄您說的sounds very interesting, except that它確實不是。沒錯,這倆地方都在緬甸,不過緬甸可是個比您想象的大的多的多民族國家,不信您去查查菇馬(Q25103690)和昆馬(Q17025472)這兩個地方的坐標是不是相隔十萬八千里呢。另外,您的.png截圖中給出的GeoNames ID 1317999只是鏈接到w:en:Kuma, Myanmar,而w:en:Kuma, Myanmar至今保留的唯一原因是“redirect created from the move of an article created years ago”,也就是說具有“possible misspelling”的可能所以只能提刪不能速刪,如果您樂意的話我今天就可以去enwiki提刪w:en:Kuma, Myanmar這個重定向。因爲這個「article move」本質是刪掉重建只是爲尊重頁面原作者的貢獻保留頁面歷史而選擇了「移動」的技術路線。前面提到了「請閱讀w:en:Talk:Kunma, Myanmar後再行論斷」相信您一定是沒讀不然不會有此誤解。
    • 話說回來,GeoNames.org裡完全查不到「Gundauyang」說明菇馬(Q25103690)可能是「Gundauyang」的別稱,如果那樣的話可能就符合WD:N,所以我至今仍然是  Neutral  Oppose重定向。-- 22:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[]


Haligonians (Q104720536): residents of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Entities for words should be created as lexemes, not items --- Jura 21:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]

  •   Keep Names for people from a place can be used as subjects, and so having an item for such concepts is perfectly correct. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 22:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
    • Any word can be a subject, but we still use lexemes, not items for them. --- Jura 22:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
      • The property main subject (P921) can have an L# value? I've never seen this. The subject would be the concept, not the word. Otherwise there would be no need for items for any concept expressed as a word or phrase. Can you show me items with main subject (P921) that have links to L numbers? UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment I think it sould be moved as a Lexeme. --Fralambert (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[]


USCG MIC Mnemonic (Q106366270): United States Coast Guard Manufacturer's Identification Code (3 letter mnemonic): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Creator request

See discussion Simon.letort (talk) 08:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[]
Fixed, remains 2 links: 1-this page, 2-the discussion where we agreed that USCG MIC Mnemonic (Q106366270) (that I created) was not needed and we should use code (P3295) as qualifier of USCG MIC (P9411) instead. Example: Hallberg-Rassy (Q456398), you can also check this list to see that code (P3295) is now used on all entries instead of USCG MIC Mnemonic (Q106366270). Simon.letort (talk) 09:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[]
Actually, not, but it describes the qualifier value of the code qualifier. --- Jura 15:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[]
Hello Jura1   YOU proposed P9073. Initially, the proponent of P9411 created an item as a property (see this diff). I replaced it to suit your property and Simon.letort's proposal. In addition, the proponent proposed a P1630 with the MIC, which was wrong, because an Integer was required. But the applicant has created another duplicate item. After further corrections and explanations, if one is kept, the other can be deleted. According to your own P9073 property, this item is not necessary and your vk amazes me. —Eihel (talk) 13:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[]


I don't see why this item should exist separately and not try to integrate it with the existing one of the ancient Argos.--Jimkats (talk) 22:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment We could alway link it to the city with archaeological site of (P9047), but I am not site this archeological site is notable. --Fralambert (talk) 22:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[]


Ates (Q97750907): given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrongly spelled Ateş, Turkish given name E4024 (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[]
I did not notice Alasanne Ates Diouf (Q62607405) but I guess Ates is not his given but middle name, probably part of the surname, showing some tribal link. (Naturally I may be wrong though.) --E4024 (talk) 20:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[]
@E4024: With the Transfermarkt player ID (P2446) of Ates Diouf (Q62607405) you can prove that it is his first name. Thus the data object Ates (Q97750907) has a structural benefit. --Gymnicus (talk) 16:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[]
What a wonderful source, wow! Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[]
You can certainly argue about sources. But you can use them. I don't know how reliable it is exactly. That's why I wouldn't mind if you used the property reason for deprecation (P2241) and one of the data objects cannot be confirmed by other sources (Q25895909) or source known to be unreliable (Q22979588) in the statement. --Gymnicus (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[]
However, I cannot understand how you added the language English to that so-called first name. Is the lingua franca in Senegal English? Does this guy have an "English surname" such as "Diouf"? You are very able to find practical solutions to practical questions. If you decided all those changes you made to this item and to that of the above-referred footballer, you are my favourite problem solver here. I will ask your help in the future wherever I am stuck in such dilemmas. --E4024 (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[]
That was my fault. In Senegal, of course, French is spoken and not English. Sorry Of course, that would have to be changed for the data. Thanks for the hint. --Gymnicus (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[]
Not at all. You can also change the language to some indigenous language of Senegal; as long as you enjoy this much liberty... BTW who else from France, Belgium or Monaco we know with the name "Ates"? I mean excepting Turks with the name "Ateş" wrongly spelt... --E4024 (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[]
  • We need français native speakers here, like Fralambert; Lymantria, is this name notable? Is there anyone else with this name in French, or in some other language, while we -at least myself- are not very sure if this is the "given name" of the said person... E4024 (talk) 14:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[]
@E4024, Gymnicus: German politician Ates Gürpinar (Q54821874) uses this variant of the name himself. I think we can therefore close this discussion as   Keep, don’t you think? --Emu (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Not for me. He does not use it "himself", German authorities oblige the Turks to write their names in German letters, no normal Turkish parent will think of giving their son a name like Ates which does not exist. BTW his surname is Gürpınar (Q66739332). Ask his father if you do not believe me. They brought their family name with them from Turkey. --E4024 (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep in use & referenced. It doesn't really matter how people ought to write their name. --- Jura 17:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Actually, German authorities don’t force you to change your name. In any case: The name exists if it is used, especially so if it’s used in official documents of a sovereign country. Epistemological discussions of this sort are interesting, but not really relevant to Wikidata. --Emu (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
We will have a problem if we start writing people's names in the way some thinks they ought to be rather than in the way the reference we use does. --- Jura 17:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Oh really? Of course your comments do not surprise me, when you added here hundreds of Turkish surnames with their references but for some reason you never added the "native language" nor "language of work or name" to those items, although it (Turkish) was written in the sources you yourself used. You also claimed Ertekin to be an "unknown language" surname, remember? You also invented, sorry introduced a thingy for "name without diacritical etc" (if there are two different names why do we need that?), and in every occasion you found in ORCID or any other place a misspelled Turkish given or surname -bots do not use ş,ı,ü,ğ if you do not teach them- you added the "without diacritical marks" alternative names and surnames you opened to those people but in many of those cases you only added the name or surname of non-diacritical treasure, without using the other one (the name or surname, it was somehow enough for you to use only a name or a surname...) which already was present in WD. I can imagine you have an agenda about all this but of course I have no doubts about your good faith. (However, when you asked some sort of admin button, I saw that other people had doubts to give you the button.) Maybe you can declare your project to the community. Best regards to all. E4024 (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
At least you concede that my contributions are referenced. Apparently, something you consider optional [2][3].
Thanks for giving me credit for the compilation method of the US census surname index, it's entirely undeserved though. I can't make much sense of the remainder of your comment, but it seems even further from Q97750907 anyways. I suppose we can close this as "not done". --- Jura 08:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  • As Mr Ateş Gürpınar was given as an example here, I had added his real name, not manipulated by German authorities, in this link, but my contribution was removed. People are free to add here 5783 sources to his manipulated name, that is irrelevant. It takes at least five centuries for a foreign name to enter another language, and only then one can claim a "new name" (with x etymology), say like Muhammet in Turkish. --E4024 (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]

{{Notdone}} @Jura1, E4024: I’m closing this. The deletion request hinges on the notion that this name does not exist. It has been shown that it does. It might be “false” or “wrong” or “forced upon”, but it is used in reality. That’s what counts in Wikidata. --Emu (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Notdone removed per request on Topic:Wcw8ev1xrxfo3453. I still think that this is an open and shut case, but I’m happy to let another admin decide. --Emu (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[]


heller ikke (L226724): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not a word or expression So9q (talk) 19:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[]

According to pons ([4]), this is already a phrase and can be kept with it. Only the lexeme would have to be expanded. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment this is borderline the "sum of the part" rule and I think a discussion on Wikidata talk:Lexicographical data to have a clear vie on this subject. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[]


DZSD-AM (Q106695876): Radio Stations in Dagupan City, Pangasinan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Crosswiki spam WikiBayer (talk) 08:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[]

  •   Keep. Valid item. Satisfies WD:N #2 and 3. --Bluemask (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[]
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[]


Paras Tomar (Q16223502): Indian Actor/ Model/ Television Personality: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Old item (article deleted at enwiki), but Imdb shows "ZOO webseries" which is part of Sunil Butolia LTA spam... --Lymantria (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[]

The IMDb-ID said that he have played in the film "377 AbNormal", which is relevant for German Wikipedia. This makes he relevant after the third Wikidata relevance point. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[]


Atia (Q105474103): possible eldest daughter of Julia Minor and Marcus Atius Balbus: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

There are only Atia (Q231696) and Atia (Q25338418). --Romulanus (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[]
It's referenced > keep. --- Jura 12:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[]
Is that the level of references? «¡Acabáramos!». --Romulanus (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]
Talk:Q105474103 for more opinions. --Romulanus (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete Need more links I cannot see it notable. Add identifiers otherwise it is promotioanl--MERLINMAR (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    • I added an identifier. Just curious, what's promotional about it? --- Jura 11:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Final of CRBF 2018-2019: CSM Satu Mare - Sepsi SIC Sf. Gheorghe (Q106947491): women's basketball game live-streamed on YouTube: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is every YouTube video notable? Trade (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]
That's interesting modeling! But before I give my opinion, I would like to hear from Coagulans why he decided to do this modeling. --Gymnicus (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]
It's not "every" YT video, it features a final of a pro league, exclusively live-streamed on YouTube. As a sports event video, it should qualify for inclusion. - Coagulans (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Charlie Bayrakcioglu (Q95799163): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

One small role in one insignificant film, I guess the person behind this pseudonym is not notable enough. (BTW the item was initiated by a sockpuppet but that is only as a sauce. :) E4024 (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]

  • The item for the film exists, and the nominated item can be linked from there as a 'cast member'. It's somewhat a marginal case but technically Q95799163 can still be used for structural need, so it's notable. --Wolverène (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  DeleteAdd external references at least to pass notability. otherwise, it will be removed.--AlexCardone (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Lucius Claudius Pulcher Nemo (Q6697504): fought against the Istrians in 177 BC: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person did not exist. --Romulanus (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[]


Literature of Annam (Q106091424): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fake content created by sock. There's no such thing called "An Nam trước thuật" Lệ Xuân (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment However, there is associated c:Category:Literature of Annam on Commons. If this is a fake content, it should also be investigated on Commons. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Saint Petersburg 2021 DTA defile (Q107063521): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this event notable (as event, not Wikinews)? Infovarius (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[]

@Infovarius: notability on Wikidata is not the same as in Wikipedias. This element connects page on ru-Wikinews and a Commons category so we should   Keep it at least for that. Красный (talk) 11:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[]
As Красный already wrote: The commons link gives the object relevance.   Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 12:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Should we keep it as Wikinews article (Q17633526) or Commons category (Q24574745)? Or do you consider it notable as fashion show (Q1153401)? --Infovarius (talk) 22:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Caecilia Metella (Q12298896): wife of Verres: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person did not exist. The wife of Verres was Vettia [5] --Romulanus (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Chianne (Q107015203): Turkish singer-songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable
--Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[]

This is why you deleted her picture from Commons? I mean "because you think she is not notable"? WD has not given such a decision.   Keep --E4024 (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Listen to this in the meantime, everybody who vote delete today will repent tomorrow. --E4024 (talk) 16:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep I see enough news urls under her real name in Turkish and in English. --RAN (talk) 12:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep ok, she deserves a WD love. --Palaangelino (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Dear Gbawden, I already showed (on the item) that notability is there, and I understand you changed your mind about this issue, for which I am hoping that you may consider -not withdrawing the DR but- amending your statement here. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • I have no issue admitting I was wrong. A lot has been added to the item since my nomination. The images are deleted for being copyvios, not for notability ̴̴

 – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gbawden (talk • contribs).

@Gbawden, E4024, Ankry, Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), Palaangelino: But where is the independent coverage? There are many links but I somehow seem to have missed the ones that aren’t promotional or branded content. --Emu (talk) 23:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

No sitelink & not linked from other items means: not notable for Wikidata. Ankry (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
"No sitelink & not linked from other items means: not notable for Wikidata." Really? Begin deleting the items of most researchers then. Please do not claim personal notability rules. If you do, do not make a link to WD:N. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 01:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Jamelia Harris (Q107141648): American sociologist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? I see some publications but relatively little strong references. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 22:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Kasun Rukmaldeniya (Q107193168): Sri Lankan IT educator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 21:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Structural need as author of (Q107193087). --E4024 (talk) 02:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Axerve (Q107225131): Payment Hub and financial services: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 09:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Ferrocarrils de la Generalitat de Catalunya (Q107245099): President FGC: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Refers to the president of FGC, but contains no relevant information. There's already an entry for the FGC. The point of this item is quite hard to see. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete. There are other ways to connect/relate/link the managers of this company to the company item. To make a special item for the post of president, as such, looks trivial to me. (Tried to make a "sophisticated" sentence, I hope you got me. :) --E4024 (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Bolli Blas (Q105633364): British Artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable artist, social media promotion. --Billy Jaz (talk) 14:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep – it seems she has some independent refs from third party sources, meeting WD:N 2. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 15:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Stefan Fussan (Q17227845): German geodesist and web developer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable. --2003:DA:1719:3E3B:3869:F0B2:E257:ADC6 20:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Discussed here: Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2017/09/27#Q17227845 – if I understand User:MisterSynergy correctly, the main reason not to delete this item was the hope that identifiers might follow. This has not happened in the last years … @DerFussi: --Emu (talk) 20:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[]
I find it interesting that you just assume the identifiers are still to come. I don't know if that would really speak in favor of the identifier. On the other hand, one can now interpret that it is not relevant for the GND and other authority files, for example, and that is why it should also be deleted here. @MisterSynergy, DerFussi: Do you have anything to add to the matter? --2003:DA:1719:3ED4:20EF:90EF:D515:BF19 14:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Sambeet Das (Q105834619): illustrator from Odisha, India: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable illustrator/wikipedian আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[]

@আফতাবুজ্জামান:, why you removed this item from the linked items? This item was linked to two items. -17:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Starr Lajoie (Q107299707): American actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[]
@Ari T. Benchaim: Thoughts on all other items by this item's creator? Mahir256 (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]
It seems like another of those genealogically tied sets of entries (which, admittedly, is a smart way of evading RfDs through creating a chain of items linked from each other). Some, however, seem to have LOC IDs and other identifiers suggestive of notability. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]
It seems like another of those genealogically tied sets of entries (which, admittedly, is a smart way of evading RfDs through creating a chain of items linked from each other). Some, however, seem to have LOC IDs and other identifiers suggestive of notability. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Bahtiyar Kadın (Q67195300): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A draft in EN:WP was deleted. Notable? E4024 (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment She seem to be one of the consorts of Mustafa II (Q199659). There is maybe a structural need. Fralambert (talk) 16:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Did you see it in En:WP? Not a reliable source. Show me a history book and I will withdraw the DR. --E4024 (talk) 23:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII): The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." --Palaangelino (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala! --E4024 (talk) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. --Palaangelino (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Ricardo Moya (Q107307764): Podcaster and Youtuber: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment It depend if we consider El Sentido De La Birra (Q107307692) notable or not. We delete none or we delete de two of them. --Fralambert (talk) 15:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Stone Clinical Laboratories (Q107305024): Committed to assisting physicians and health systems in caring for their patients, as well as enlightening patients to become a partner in their optimal health.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[]

There is some independent coverage, but I’m not sure if that’s enough. --Emu (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Cyubahiro Gadi (Q105066545): Rwandan Record Producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 19:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Wolfgang Mosley-Stephen (Q55077090): American musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Jaxon Robb (Q55097249): American musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Zigimo Beats (Q101565422): American Lofi producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Crossing the Divide (Q107322313): A non profit organization that aims to combat political polarization, by inviting students to discuss controversial political issues.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N – no evidence this organization exists or has any substantial third party corroboration. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 03:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Tannah mr broken english (Q107334985): comedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 16:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep Have some media coverage [6], [7] --Fralambert (talk) 02:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Txema Cabo (Q107338075): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N? I can't find much on him and the entry doesn't disclose a lot. He was a relative of a notable person, but there is no structural need in that the notable person can be explained perfectly well without any links to this subject. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Mongo (Q107339150): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N? Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 22:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep The Chopo University Museum (Q1954283) Seem have a collection of his art[8] or [9]. --Fralambert (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Umair Ahmad (Q107352066): Businessman & Researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep as structural need for Masterpieces of Lahore Museum: (Revised Version) (Q107352112), who seem notable. --Fralambert (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Intyce (Q105262003): artist, record producer and fashion designer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Many IDs, but none imply notability. Haansn08 (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  •   Keep Notable:

1. (print Barnes & Noble magazine)
2. (MTV Movie & TV Awards)
3. (print GMARO magazine)
4. (print MUZE magazine)
8. bonus for you: the item has a commons link.

If I could have found more details about this brilliant guy who previously created/mentored Normani in her journey to Fifth Harmony as she says in her Netflix documentary and Fuse interview, now I would have been asking you to create his multilingual Wikipedias, my guy. But I think, these are enough to keep him in Wikidata. :) I don't know why is your aggressive attitude to me thou. I hope it's not personal. --Palaangelino (talk) 23:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Actually, I thought it may be the right time to gift him a couple of stub Wikipedia articles. And maybe, you can write the Dutch and English ones for him. --Palaangelino (talk) 03:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Bulk deletion request: Items created by User:PalaangelinoEdit

  1. Q104586509 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q99898743 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q99578516 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q98908281 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q106638630 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q106477781 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q106381290 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q106672382 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q106672296 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q106671731 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability. Items have many external IDs, however all of them do not imply notability. Haansn08 (talk) 13:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  •   Keep I didn't understand which WD:N this user is talking about. Stop spam my friend.

1. has a commons link already. also check:
1. has a commons link already. also check:
1. has a commons link already. also check:
1. has a commons link already. also check:
1. has a commons link already. also check:

Check this user's talk page, please... --Palaangelino (talk) 23:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[]

@Palaangelino: I’m sorry but a Commons category link isn't proof of notability, see Wikidata:Notability #1.4. I just checked a couple of the links you provided. All seem user-generated or sponsored. Is there any independent, serious coverage about any of the items in question? --Emu (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Thanks for letting me know about commons thou. That's such useful info. Also no, I don't think all of these are user-generated or the other, cuz I picked these carefully from many different sources around. Many of these are online copies of newspaper appearances or national media sources having a large editorial team in Turkey. And I do believe we're not creating an encyclopedic Wikipedia article here. More than one source shud be enough to prove an item's data-related notability which is true and trusted knowledge. I'm aware that we don't want to stack false information into our database and so you can be sure I don't. I'm a data specialist irl. --Palaangelino (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[]


2006 Trophée d'Or Féminin - 3th stage (Q107452770): cycling race: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not enough parameters Voyagerim (talk) 11:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep Used. Initially, due to not quite correct filling with data, a decision arose to delete it. — GAN (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Ancestors of Sven-Göran ErikssonEdit

Ancestors of Sven-Göran Eriksson, who are not relevant themselves and only have a person ID (P1819) which, in my opinion, has no relevance, as we are not a genealogy site here. Gymnicus (talk) 20:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  •   Keep "We are not a genealogy site", but we are a database consisting of entries from other databases. --RAN (talk) 05:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete except for parents. --- Jura 08:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep There is considerable overlap between genealogical information and databases. Wikidata is most certainly a database so will naturally accumulate significant genealogical information. All of these pages appear to meet notability guidelines. Supertrinko (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[]


single-organism process (Q22269530): biological process that involves only one organism: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No content Paracel63 (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep Seem notable, only strangely a bot deleted all the content. --Fralambert (talk) 01:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Great Britain (Q107482134): official and unofficial grouping of England, Scotland and Wales, including the island of Great Britain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Too vague in its presentation, is it official, or unofficial, is it the older nation, is it the island. Seems like an incorrect creation for Wikidata criteria which it duplicates  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep geographic region different from the island itself. --- Jura 08:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Azizjon Abdullaev (Q107225958): Tajik indoor rower: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? -- Emu (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Hamza Hamry (Q107231686): Tunisian mixed martial artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? -- Emu (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Hi :@Emu: Is there a compelling reason to delete the character's content ? This is a public figure with achievements and many newspapers and television programs have talked about him. Please make sure of that, thank you.

@Jamel eddiiïne: Yes, he may indeed be notable, but I couldn’t find any independent information on this person. Please provide references for your claims. --Emu (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]
@Emu: He is a professional Tunisian player mma and judoka and actor and has many references, the most important of which is this :

[10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] I had mentioned them in references on wikidata when I created.

All links seem user-generated and/or promotional to me. --Emu (talk) 17:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep 1,640 Gnews hits. --RAN (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Category:Nagoya photographs taken on 2021-07-17 (Q107380058): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment We should delete for all the serie, or none of these. Because we seem to have 900 of these[18]. Fralambert (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment I think that all of them can be deleted. These categories are just hidden categories on Commons and there will never be such categories on other projects that we will have to connect with each other. --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete Commons categories aren't notable per se. --- Jura 08:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]

photographed on date categories from Commons --- Jura 04:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  • BTW, the other 800 or so should be deleted as well. --- Jura 08:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Ali Leo (Q106941968): Iraqi singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) Notable? E4024 (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]

I am not an Arabic speaker, but there was a request for an article for this singer, and considering the number of views his participation in Iraq Idols got on Youtube (over a million for the final), I really think he at least deserves a Wikidata item - hoping off course, that other people would add information to the item! He is the winner of Iraq Idols 2021: [19]. Ciell (talk) 09:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[]
When I opened the DR, you had not even put a name to the entry; I saw a redlink visitor adding a name and only so noticed that we had an item about a "nameless person". So I do not know what to say... --E4024 (talk) 19:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[]
The Arabic name was there though? I was (and still am) not sure about the transcription of the name in Latin script, there are different varieties around. Ciell (talk) 19:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Let's agree on not agreeing then. --E4024 (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Closing admin, please ignore my above words, just decide on notability. --E4024 (talk) 14:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep has some media coverage. --Megatron34 (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Q101438260Edit (Q101438260): News and breaking news, latest news, magazine, sports and economy, local and world news are on (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 19:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[]
No surprise; probably the item was only meant to be made for that link. --E4024 (talk) 01:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Dalibagh metro station (Q20861594): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ? --Bouzinac💬✒️💛 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete Neither listed on North-South Corridor (Q18128813) or East-West Corridor (Q18112132), the station seem inexisant. --Fralambert (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment @Bouzinac, Fralambert: apparently it was a never-finished project, shouldn't we keep it as such? (we already have a lot of projected metro station). Here I'm more concerned at the lack of sources (which in itself is not enough for deletion). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]


The Walt Disney Studios Hits $4 Billion Globally in Record Time; Dates Several Upcoming Releases (Q21079834): blog entry: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Gymnicus (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment What is the purpose of this proposal? What was the purpose of this edit? Dancter (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep, we have a lot of items on "serious and publicly available references" like scholarly articles, and I believe anything published in the blog of a large company like Disney passes that test. ミラP@Miraclepine 20:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Jamil Khan (Q107620316): Jamil khan is a civil engineer by chance and Journalist by Choice. Founder of Newspaper and Media website, He born in Rajasthan's small town Ladnun in 1992: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 14:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Description (by the same person I guess :) gives a clear impression of self promotion; I opened a DR for their news website. If we decide on the notability (or the lack of it) of that one first, maybe it could be easier to deal with this one. I doubt neither of the two are N. --E4024 (talk) 22:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Q35211388: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sources and no use Gymnicus (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Muslim minister (Q107637527): religious position in the Nation of Islam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Delete it or merge "muslim minister" with imam; clear enough. E4024 (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep @E4024: I completely disagree. A "Muslim minister" is a position unique to the Nation of Islam (Q220222). NOI does not follow traditional Islamic practices. (edit conflict)MJLTauk 22:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]
And I completely disagree with your effort to show a muslim community as a religion (see item history please). --E4024 (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]
IMHO this edit of yours is not consistent with what you say above, BTW. --E4024 (talk) 23:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]
I am not an expert on Islam to say the very least (the name might be a tip-off). However, there appears to be enough terminological differences between the NOI and Islam in general to consider 'Muslim minister' separate from 'imam', the way we consider specific religious roles inside certain branches of Islam (e.g. Hojatoleslam (Q1622758) and ayatollah (Q184402) for Twelver Shi'a, the Da'i al-Mutlaq (Q20563234) for Isma'ili, etc.) to be specific entities. Consequently,   Keep. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]
The names are not tips to specialization. Mine is identical to a road number; someone asked me if I was a truck driver and I accepted. Indeed I have traveled almost as much as one. :) --E4024 (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]
The examples you state are about religious "hierarchy" elsewhere, imam, in my belief is not a religious leader, but an "occupation", which of course may be the "profession" of some people also. (WP info does not mean anything to me.) Imam just leads a prayer. this person is only needed in collective prayers. At home everybody prays alone. BTW no imam is supposed to be in a higher or lower level than other. He or she (in Turkey we have a circle where women also lead prayers, something envisaged by Islam, although now known much) is just "any person" -well can be a "gentile" (sic, I mean a person who has no religious education/status, just any moslem :) who can lead a prayer. Read my words in this framework please. --E4024 (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Gino Marcello Fracchiolla (Q107552046): Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Dosent match notability policy --Dharmaxyz (talk) 22:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment He's maybe notable, I found [20] and [21]. Fralambert (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[]
@Fralambert: Hm … seems like branded content / advertorial / “community entry“ to me --Emu (talk) 22:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Rory James Medlicott Vereker (Q75716847): born 1981: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This page is about me, but there is no information on it besides a reference to my parents, which is personal information, and I would prefer it to be removed. --2A00:23C6:C86:C600:88F1:E4D8:6D:EB9C 08:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]

El Comité (Q55455579) casesEdit


Meneses Monroy (Q56043462): Mexican lawyer and writer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable person creating biographies at tens of wikis; deletion requests have been placed and are being actioned, may need to wait for wikis to finish their processing  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Delete Fails notability policy; created as part of self-promotion operation Fmarioivan
  Keep Via the URL you can prove the statement El Comité (Q55455579) founded by (P112) Meneses Monroy (Q56043462) and thus the data object Meneses Monroy is relevant according to the third point of the relevance criteria. Even if the Romanian Wikipedia article is deleted. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep He have also is own entry [22] Fralambert (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep per Fralambert & Gymnicus. Mass creation of pages by the same user is not welcomed and it's annoying but isn't wrong if the notability of the subject can be justified. --Wolverène (talk) 08:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Bulk deletion request: non-notable magazine issuesEdit

These are all items, with no sitelinks whatsoever, for issues of an encyclopedically irrelevant, self-published magazine, a pet project of one Marco Antonio Meneses Monroy, who is a nobody in Mexico but has seemingly employed suckpuppet accounts to create articles on himself, his poems, his blog, his mom (seemingly confusing Wikimedia for the Mormons’ FamilySearch!), his magazine and his friends on multiple editions of Wikipedia since 2018, as well as repeatedly adding himself to other articles, putting himself at the level of writers like Octavio Paz. To be clear: none of this person’s projects are reviewed in any third-party online source, let alone a reputable one.

Part of large-scale, cross-wiki spam operation Born2bgratis (talk) 09:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment All of these issues could well be relevant through the third point of Wikidata's relevance criteria. The magazine El Comité 1973 (Q53644712) itself is clearly relevant via the second point of the Wikidata relevance criteria through its entry in the Enciclopedia de la Literatura en México. I don't want to decide for myself whether all the has part (P527) statements help the respective editions to be relevant. But at least she can see that so much has been recorded. --Gymnicus (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Ediciones Comité (Q70961151): educational institution and publishing house: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Born2bgratis (talk) 02:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete Spam, Fails notability policy; created as part of self-promotion operation Fmarioivan


Q64993214: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidta notability criteria, part of xwiki vanity spam  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Delete Yeah, when I was in middle school we also played pretend, that we were part of secret societies. Born2bgratis (talk) 06:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Delete Spam! These guys have spammed in a big way. Fmarioivan
Delete. It looks like there is a committee working hard to promote a couple of people. --E4024 (talk) 14:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Q56825176: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability policy; created as part of self-promotion operation; no sitelinks left Born2bgratis (talk) 08:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete Spam Fmarioivan


Q78209275: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Part of Marco Antonio Meneses Monroy's spammy items Born2bgratis (talk) 13:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Dulce María Mariscal Nava (Q96911985): Mexican researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? E4024 (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep legitimate university profile. --RAN (talk) 05:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete An id of a social network is not to be remarkable. Fmarioivan

Discussion for El Comité casesEdit

  • The problem with these cases is that El Comité (Q55455579) has various sitelinks …--Emu (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    For this one, it won't be deleted from dewiki since it seem notable. Have a article on the Enciclopedia de la literatura en México [23]. Fralambert (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    Yeah, that item is probably here to stay. The question seems to be: Where are the boundaries of WD:N #3? Meneses Monroy (Q56043462) is currently linked from 168 items. --Emu (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    I fully support Emu's question and it should be discussed, because through "infinite" WD: N # 3 chains we could at some point have any data objects there that we do not want at all. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    @Emu @Gymnicus Seem that he plublished nothing... [24] This Enciclopedia is probably a good start to see if something is notable or not. Fralambert (talk) 21:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    @Fralambert: According to the German-language Wikipedia, the encyclopedia also seems to be trustworthy. Or does someone not see it that way? --Gymnicus (talk) 21:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    @Gymnicus The Encyclopedia give the VIAF or other IDs when availible. [25]. So I say that it is as trusworty as Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada 1800-1950 ID (P8098), by exemple. Fralambert (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Virus Matemático casesEdit


Virus Matemático (Q107177943): International social movement: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable; cross-wiki spam Born2bgratis (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  Delete, the item isn't linked to a page anymore, and it's related to Nicolás Atanes (Q106452636), another case of cross-wiki spam by the same user. I requested its deletion below. -sasha- (talk) 12:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[]


Nicolás Atanes (Q106452636): Spanish mathematical activist (born 2004): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person and cross-wiki spam by the globally locked user Remitbuber. -sasha- (talk) 12:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  • "Mathematical activist"? What does that mean? Delete this nonsense please. --E4024 (talk) 01:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete Another case of a very pertiancious cross-wiki spammer (just like in the Meneses Monroy case), constantly recreating already deleted material on several Romance-language wikis. It’s obvious for anyone in the Wikimedia movement that, if you have to fake your relevance by abusing Wikimedia resources, you are not relevant in the real world — if you were, people would volunteer to write articles for you. Born2bgratis (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Discussion for Virus Matemático casesEdit

  • El País (although in the what-to-do section), El Diario Vasco, EU stuff – sure looks like notability per WD:N #2 --Emu (talk) 12:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[]
    • Definite   Keep. ABC and El Economista - there is a good amount of coverage by reputable publications. Aranya (talk) 16:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Deleted by User:Rzuwig, no specific reason given. --Emu (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • El Economista no dice nada del fundador. Si van a quedarse con Virus Matemático, pf borren la persona que se presenta como su fundador. Por lo menos hasta que veamos mas referencias sobre él. No sé pq me vino a mano escribir en castellano... --E4024 (talk) 01:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Sonichu (Q107859050): fictional character: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Christine Weston Chandler (Q98406706): American artist, creator of Sonichu: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Violates BLP Trade (talk) 09:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@GorillaWarfare:--Trade (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@GorillaWarfare:--Trade (talk) 10:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Trade: There’s a sitelink to ru.wp so deletion isn’t really an option at the moment. Aren’t your concerns more of an Oversighter situation? --Emu (talk) 10:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
The ru.wp article have been marked for deletion for almost six months now@Emu:--Trade (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • The IMDb seems to make it look like we might have structural need to keep as creator of Sonichu. The rest - it seems like this person is putting their information out there, so how is it a privacy issue for us to report it? Snackmurat (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Snackmurat: from what I understand, some users on the English WP absolutely want Chris Chan/Christine Weston Chandler to be outside of any Wikiproject (it may be a consensus, but it does not seem like); see for example here, here, and here. I must say I do not really understand those people's decision; from what I get, they believe creating a Chris Chan article or Wikidata Item is a form of harassment even if the article or item is properly sourced by reliable sources. Veverve (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Just because a reliable source discusses someone doesn't mean that a Wikipedia article should exist. There are many people who are mentioned in reliable sources who aren't considered notable by Wikipedia standards. The fact is that these articles have been used as weapons to humiliate the subject who has been a harassment target of internet trolls for over a decade now. BLP takes priority of RS. 2601:1C0:6D00:A560:F478:E2DC:FAB:423D 04:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@2601:1C0:6D00:A560:F478:E2DC:FAB:423D: Apparently, there is a consensus to memory hole the person from WP en, even the mention of their name, and the person's pseudonym is forbidden in WP en talk pages. Even wanting to add the person's name in an article is enough to be suspected to be a harasser apparently, judging from this WP en admin's comment. Obviously, it is not about sources or BLP in WP en. There also seems to be an active struggle to memory hole the person from other WProjects. Veverve (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Jeannine Maistre (Q98793043): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable? Apart from supporting a football team there's nothing here. Xezbeth (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Xezbeth: I believe that if you are already proposing to delete it, then you should also suggest the data object Q98843110 for deletion. Because the lady wants to be relevant through this data object. Firstly through a structural benefit and secondly through an independent and reputable source. Unfortunately, I can't really help because I neither buy the Bugey-Côtière newspaper nor even understand French. So you would have to ask a French-speaking Wikidata user if he can help. --Gymnicus (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Exactly. @Xezbeth:, why do you think the article in question isn’t a “serious and publicly available reference”? --Emu (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Emu: I also have a certain skepticism towards this newspaper (Bugey-Côtière (Q65493541)). If you look at who created the data object here in Wikidata and the articles in the English and French-language Wikipedia, then you can already assume Pay-Edit and then I am, like you, always quite cautious. --Gymnicus (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Bulk deletion request (Montreux)Edit

All items created from Montreux Jazz Festival database and now deleted from that database

All items created from Montreux Jazz Festival database and now deleted from that database Obruchez (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  • any idea why they were deleted from that database? I'd like to add some of the musicians to a music site, but not if they were, as example, a fake entry. Snackmurat (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • the best I can tell, it looks like they were duplicate MJF entries (such as Dave and David or Field instead of Fields). I have gone through the first batch. Some have been merged and/or more data added. While others, I can't find a duplicate item and should probably be deleted - unless someone wants to take time to do a deep search. I can work on the rest at another time. Snackmurat (talk) 21:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Sorry, I should have mentioned this: most deletions come from the fact that duplicate entries in the Montreux Jazz Festival were cleaned and hence merged together. Obruchez (talk) 08:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I have finished batch 2. Snackmurat (talk) 02:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Q56598451: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probably does not exist, see Q56648314 for the correct item Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@Ben Skála: Pinging item author for verification. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Protest of Greenpeace with coal in front of the German Chancellery (Q73173641): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Either add sources or delete them. A Wikimedia Commons gallery is not enough for relevance. Gymnicus (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]

I think every unique (protest) event fits the criteria as "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". --GPSLeo (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@GPSLeo: I do not think so. If you share your assessment, then the school performance in which I played in the fourth grade would also be relevant and thus I would also be relevant via the third point of the relevance criteria. But that is not the case, because this school performance cannot be described with “serious and publicly available references”. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I think the school performance was not public. For this event there was a pess release[26] and it was mentioned in some news articles. --GPSLeo (talk) 11:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@GPSLeo: That's exactly what I'm saying. If there are reports in the media about the event or demonstration, then the data object can be kept. But these links must also be contained in the data object. As I can see, you as the creator of the data object don't seem to care about the obligation to provide evidence. --Gymnicus (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Should I use external data available at (P1325) for this? --GPSLeo (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@GPSLeo: That or described at URL (P973)! --Gymnicus (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Poppy Parker Bowles (Q76241687): born 2013: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No other source is available apart from the Peerage ID. Gymnicus (talk) 16:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[]


MD Pictures (Q56085408): Indonesian company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Sojol Rana (talk) 14:50, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Comment I once undone the IP edits that taught the data object. From the general impression, the data object should not be relevant. But the company may have a structural benefit for the higher-level organizations. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:46, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I observe that IPs do what they want here as there are not enough patrols, while many hard-working people cannot even confirm their own contributions... We will always have an admin backlog on this page and on other pages that need admin intervention. Thinks me... --E4024 (talk) 20:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[]
The item identical to Q96100236. ―Rex AurōrumDisputātiō 23:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Notability, empty, redundant etc elements apart, after the DR there has been a rise in the number of edits on this item. Some colleague who is familiar to the issue should review the case. --E4024 (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Michael Lombard (Q107538180): American fashion designer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not quite sure if the links are serious, some seem very promotional -- Emu (talk) 23:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Khai Malik Hadid (Q107125304): Gigi Hadid & Zayn´s first child: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Do we need this item? If so, maybe we should protect it. E4024 (talk) 01:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Edit group QSv2T/1629128753317Edit

Summary #quickstatements; Author Kinvidia
Number of edits 1,212 (more statistics) Example edit Q34354153

Upload stopped at some point, I made changes on the sheet, and I am uploading the entire work again. Kinvidia (talk) 17:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@Kinvidia: I don’t understand your request. The example edit seems reasonable, why should we delete the edit group? And even if the edits are wrong, why can’t you fix them yourself? --Emu (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Mirell Merirand (Q108117633): teacher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 07:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  Wait streak of several similar items that don’t necessarily seem promotional, asked creator on talk page --Emu (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Christian clergyman (Q105200223): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

As we do not have an item like "Christian clergywoman", delete either this or "Christian clergy". No need for both. E4024 (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Dear Bot, the other one is only used in Sam Prempeh (Q106308124); we can also delete that one, but in an era of gender equality we should better delete (or merge into Christian clergy) the one that ends in "man". --E4024 (talk) 20:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep Christian clergyman (Q105200223) is for people (it could be made more clear that this item isn’t necessarily only for men), Christian clergy (Q105322843) for the group as a whole --Emu (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]


line (Q66539729): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unable to determine referent. Single linked item has been deleted and I have been unable to find archived or cached versions to determine a suitable merge target. Daask (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I was able to find and if that helps? - Nikki (talk) 07:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Hanim (Q88209141): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Opened by mistake as confused with the Turkish courtesy word Hanım, which means Mam, Madam, etc. I do not know if there are enough people with this "surname" to accept it as valid. I do not know how to search that. What I know is that it was opened by confusion and that there are no items (people) using this family name. E4024 (talk) 03:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]
That link was due to not having the title "Khanum/Hanım" (Q108165988) until several hours ago. The person died much before there were surnames in the Ottoman Empire. --E4024 (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • Dear Lotje, you suddenly decided to make a c:Category:Hanim (surname), but none of the two people there have this surname. One has a stage name, and the other never had a surname. (See above please.) You know you can always contact me about Turkish culture. Hanım is part of it. (If you spoke Turkish, we would call you Lotje Hanım. :) Regards. --E4024 (talk) 16:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep There are several persons with that name according to VIAF. --Emu (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]

I know some women with the given name Hanım, but do not know of anybody with that "surname". Can you show some examples, please, Emu? Thx. E4024 (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
You can look for yourself on VIAF. But I have no doubt that you will somehow manage to explain that all those names are “wrong” for some reason. --Emu (talk) 20:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
If something is wrong, it is wrong; irrespective of what I say or do. BTW I have seen the acronym around but got no idea what it is. --E4024 (talk) 21:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]

sudanese entrepreneursEdit


Boy Mou (Q108153528): South Sudanese Fashioner: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 06:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Ayuel Monykuch (Q107746966): South Sudanese entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion --Gymnicus (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Star CMG (Q108733126): South Sudanese entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion --Gymnicus (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete No references anywhere. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 17:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[]


40 EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes : Munich, Germany, 5-9 September 2004 (Q56836084): article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not a scientific article but merely a list of attendiees of a conference. See for the fulltext where only affiliations and names appear. I don't think lists of attendees to every conference in the worlds is in scope. So9q (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Aytekin Taşöz (Q107560994): Turkish artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I opened this item because the artist had many films in IMDb; however I am afraid they are minor roles. Therefore I propose deletion for NN. E4024 (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Pinging User:Geegolly and Admin Nikki as example to a similar discussion. --E4024 (talk) 15:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete similar discussion? I don't see any similarity :) This entity has no news coverage... --Geegolly (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I guess you know better than anybody here that those so-called news ("Kimdir, nedir, boyu kaç, sevgilisi kim?" etc) are paid thrash. I only use that kind of stuff if it appears in newspapers and internet sites like Hürriyet, Habertürk et al. Maybe these pages are also promotional, but at least they appear on a "notable" site, and not junk that some red-link users have been using lately to introduce here Turkish businesspeople, models, actors etc that nobody has ever heard of. I see that now you have a blue link to your username, so do not take it personally. E4024 (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I believe the news title doesn't matter at all but what written inside. if it's not a promotional user-generated blog site but a news network having an editorial team either it's massive or local or even niche, "Kimdir, nedir, boyu kaç..." content is not related to promotional stuff. After all, it's the news network which cycles every day as usual. So they create "Kimdir, nedir, boyu kaç..." content about people who made an appearance on TV or anywhere really just because they need clicks for their own news network even if it's a major news platform. I told Nikki on his talk page my entity has many appearances on TV as well. Also not all my news sources are about "Kimdir, nedir, boyu kaç..." stuff. I hope this makes sense about what the news network is. So please don't drive this space into a void. And again, I don't see any similarities, at all. Much respect. --Geegolly (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Saying "...nobody has ever heard of" is out of notability context as we all know. Notability is not related to fame, respect, or any other label. Notability policies are certain: if the entity is covered by sources, it makes the item notable and anyone can create it or edit it. Because it makes the entity's properties trustworthy which Wikidata mostly cares about. We only care if the data is correct or not as a knowledge graph system just like others such as, CIA World Factbook, DBpedia, and Freebase which later turned into --Geegolly (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Since when do we delete entries from actors who have 53 credits in the IMDb? -- 09:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Delete IMDB is self-edited, so not reliable. Not even notable enough for tr.wp. In the absence of INDEPENDENT sources, delete. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
But that doesn't change the fact that he has appeared in more than 250 episodes of various television series between 2008 and today. There are also some feature films in which he has participated. -- 10:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Megatron34 casesEdit


Fatih Kaba (Q107024348): Turkish entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. The site called Marmara gazetesi is clearly making paid promotion. E4024 (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]

This RfD worries me for two reasons: First, User:E4024 should have mentioned that it wasn’t their first attempt to get this item deleted, see Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2021/07/19#Q107024348. Second, this is yet another item of User:Megatron34 who already managed to convice User:Mahir256 and User:Taketa to restore this item. This users is trying to get me to restore another item without notability on my talk page. I would suggest to   Delete this item and probably all items by the same user (I haven’t checked them all). --Emu (talk) 21:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Sorry, I did not mention the first DR, simply because I had forgotten about it. I DR'ed Coşkun Çetin (Q108001568), for which reason I looked at the other contributions by the same user and saw this one. I cannot understand why these people would be notable. OTOH, maybe like in Commons and WPs we should develop a "deletion request message" gadget and seeing my messages of deletion on a user's talk page I would remember to say it is the second time I am DR'ing an item. (BTW I see that it was deleted the first time.) Sorry again. --E4024 (talk) 22:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep I don't get the point of why convincing(?) 2 different admins is not enough for you two. And nobody but you both are trying to delete all my items forcing "they're not notable." I don't know how E4024 is saying Marmara Gazetesi is "clearly" making promotion and also he is requesting a deletion for my another item (Coşkun Çetin) which has many news including national ones. I don't even want to mention that Emu is not answering my questions properly and ignoring me on the talk page. So Emu basically saying User:Mahir256 and User:Taketa did the wrong thing by communicating and understanding me but the user itself doing the right thing by only ignoring me and forcing own truth. I don't know. Also check Coşkun Çetin RfD above. --Megatron34 (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[]
    • No, that’s not what I’m saying. Both User:Mahir256 and User:Taketa actually were very skeptical about your restoration request, voiced concerns about the notability and specifically advised you to improve the item “before it is deleted again.” In the end, they apparently gave your item the benefit of the doubt as is standard practice per AGF (assume food faith). But you have a history of trying to get and keep items of questionable notability into Wikidata, so in the end, one might have to question wether this principle should really be the guiding star when in doubt. --Emu (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]
      • No. Actually, I was late to add references too many times to my items, so they were not meeting the notability as I mentioned for both. I created items without adding references so Mahir deleted it. I told Mahir that I'll add soon but one or two day(s) after Taketa deleted it again for the same reason. Then he restored the item so I finally added references before it got deleted again. This was what happened exactly. --Megatron34 (talk) 02:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]
        • And, as you can see I added his Linkedin profile to my item on May 29. E4024 requested deletion by the statement "I see one person with this name ( who is a graduate of another university -that may be a mistake- and does not look like notable." on July 18. The statement looks weird to me. Because two Linkedin profiles are obviously not the same. Check it out. --Megatron34 (talk) 02:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]
          • Addition to that misdirecting statement of the user, you can just google "fatih kaba" and see him on the first page or on the first page of Google News. It seems like it's not that hard to confuse different "fatih kaba"s Linkedin accounts. So confused... --Megatron34 (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • When I make the said search in Google I only see self bragging in self-created pages; if I make the search in "news" what I see mostly is news about "Afşin İlçe Milli Eğitim Müdürü Fatih Kaba", who is a local bureaucrat. Maybe you wanted to make an item for the public servant and got confused? Please tell us, if it's not what I just said, what was the reason that inspired you to make the item of the person who does not appear at the news searches (but at IMDb, Linkedin etc) and preferred him to the more notable Fatih Kaba? I really wonder. E4024 (talk) 23:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Olgun Kızıltepe (Q107024554): Turkish journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam, Advertising Comeon J (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Problems around this name: One of the sources used on the item is the newssite where he works. (Not an independent source.) It describes the person (BTW as a Turkish citizen and quite a reader I never heard his name before) twice! as "successful journalist" in the first ever sentence!!! Plus: "Mesleğinde ilkeli çizgisini koruyan ve gazeteciliği yeni nesil ihtiyaçlara entegre ederek icra eden Gazeteci Olgun Kızıltepe hakkında detaylı araştırmalar yapılıyor." (sic) This is not journalism. I confess I have used this site on items of other people here in WD and in WPs. I believe we should not use this site for items of the "personnel" of the same site. This much from me because I do not want my talk page to be filled with unwanted talk. --E4024 (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep No, it's not spam or advert. I never heard his name too until I saw him on a news site but he's truly a journalist according to his news site profile. I'd never say "this is not writing" if I don't approve a writer's book or any publication. If it sits there and people reading it, the writer is a writer as a datum. WD:N says items should be described with serious sources which are not self-generated because they're promotional. The news website is a serious source that no one can edit or self-generate such a profile. So I added this site source to prove that he is a journalist, not to promote his profile or his journalism. This profile link alone is enough to prove his identity as a journalist. So we can't say "let's delete this because someone didn't approve him as a journalist." You can share and discuss your opinions about journalism, or entities' fame on other platforms. As I read, Wikidata is not a blog site and is not built for these opinions. I'm open to discussions about the topics outside of Wikidata by the way. Just hit me up on my talk page, we can discuss everything forever including "if Olgun's journalism is journalism or not." I'd also never make a fight against news sources like or Marmara gazetesi which you mentioned above on another RfD that you requested. Because you can easily find that New York Times is also making paid promotions too, including articles and storytelling. Don't we include NYT in WD items and WP articles? Let's work around data (the information) I guess. --Megatron34 (talk) 23:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
"I saw him on a news site". Hmmm. This reminds me of the famous "Bir gün bir kitap okudum ve bütün hayatım değişti" (One day I read a book and all my life changed) in Yeni Hayat (The New Life) of Orhan Pamuk. Pamuk inspired the title from Ziya Gökalp's homonymous book and wrote his own as a novel. I wonder why you were suddenly attracted to the idea of making an item for an unknown journalist... Look, if you are "him" say it and it will be understandable, how many of us did not write his/her name on wet cement when we were kids... E4024 (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Deletion requests in relation to Nima OwjiEdit


Deletion repuest 1Edit

Nima Owji (Q104713328): Software Developer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable / please also delete Wikipedia page. -- 09:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep Easily passes WD:N #2 with hundreds of news articles. Wikicheshmeh (talk) 16:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Emu: Clear decision to stay right now, right? Structural benefit via the data object Preview: Take a look a Twitter’s upcoming Community feature published on 9to5Mac (Q108324433) which is clearly relevant through its Wikisource link. --Gymnicus (talk) 09:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
The crossed-out statement can be skipped because the Wikisource link of the data object Preview: Take a look a Twitter’s upcoming Community feature published on 9to5Mac (Q108324433) has been removed because the Wikisource page has been deleted. So the question of relevance now arises for the data object Preview: Take a look a Twitter’s upcoming Community feature published on 9to5Mac (Q108324433) and I have already suggested deleting it. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Emu:, the anonymous IP address who has requested for its deletion doesn't have other contributions and they've also requested to delete Nima Owji, 3 times in this week! Possible spam, right? Wikicheshmeh (talk) 11:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Wikicheshmeh: It doesn't matter who made the deletion requests. In addition, the IP may simply no longer find the request for deletion. This can happen by more than 222 deletion requests. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Deletion request 2Edit

Nima Owji (Q104713328): Software Developer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable -- 00:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep I think what you're doing is vandalism! You've requested to delete this item 3 times and all of those other requests are still open. I think you have a personal animosity! As I mentioned in those 3 requests, this item meets WD:N #2 and #3 with hundrerds of news coverage! Click here to see the news coverage on Google Wikicheshmeh (talk) 03:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
I noticed he hasn't contributed elsewhere so I think we have a personal animosity case! Isn't this against Wikidata rules? Wikicheshmeh (talk) 03:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
delete: clearly not notable. also delete the app that links to them. BrokenSegue (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
BrokenSegue, doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh (talk) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue (talk) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh (talk) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]


image-it (Q105494529): Web Based Application: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable -- 18:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Wait currently notable per WD:N #3 because of Nima Owji (Q104713328) (RfD’ed sitelink) --Emu (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Keep it has become the fifth app of the day on Product Hunt. Seems like notable! Nima Owji is has a good amount of news coverage too. Wikicheshmeh (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[]
clearly not notable. being fifth on product hunt for a split second is not sufficient. also delete the author's item. BrokenSegue (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  Delete Not notable. Being on product hunt is not sufficient for notability.

This vote is by the person who has requested for deletion. Wikicheshmeh (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Preview: Take a look a Twitter’s upcoming Community feature published on 9to5Mac (Q108324433): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Relevance not shown --Gymnicus (talk) 11:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  Comment, the relevance seems to be clear, using the original publication article. I guess a person or a group of people are trying to delete Nima Owji. The IP address is the same. Wikicheshmeh (talk) 11:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Wikicheshmeh: So you indirectly assume that I am the IP that suggested the other two data objects for deletion. Then again I hear that several new user accounts are trying to make the person Nima Owji, who is irrelevant from my point of view, relevant. So now enough macho behavior. --Gymnicus (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Gymnicus: Never meant you are that person 'cause it's obvious that that person is Iranian. Just said my opinion! Thanks for your hardworking here! Wikicheshmeh (talk) 12:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Vicky Smit (Q108190953): registered nurse: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability Rockpeterson (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  Delete She maybe become notable in the future, but even if she as a lot a reshearch ID, she don't seem to have problished anything. --Fralambert (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep She has recognized identifiers, although I am perturbed that none of the statements has references for the data. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[]


(L61046): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We already model Chinese characters as items, see (Q3595028) for the existing item for this character. When used as a word in a language, there should be language-specific lexemes, like 雨/あめ (L167), which link to the corresponding item using Han character in this lexeme (P5425). --Nikki (talk) 07:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Douglas Ferregui (Q13373023): Brazilian singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Visibly non-notable personality page for the project, possibly self-promotion. The person does not have an article on Wikipedia in the native language. Text in the Indonesian version is marked for deletion. --Jardel fale 08:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

The fact that he does not have an article in the Portuguese-language Wikipedia and that his article may be deleted from the Indonesian-language Wikipedia only suggests that he does not meet the first point of the Wikidata relevance criteria. But that does not mean that it is not relevant here in Wikidata, if that were the case then Wikidata would have far fewer data objects. If you look at his IMDb page nm9536756, which is currently not yet specified as a source in the data object, you can see that he played in a relevant film in 2010. This film is even represented with the data object High School Musical: O Desafio (Q3283430) here in Wikidata and thus has Douglas Ferregui (Q13373023) a structural use as an actor in this film. This means that the data object is to be kept clear.   Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Gymnicus: I don't think the participation was very relevant as a quick search doesn't return notorious results. Can you find any? Jardel fale 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@Wjalves: It doesn't matter whether he only played a supporting role or a leading role. As long as he is mentioned in the opening or closing credits and this is probably the case. As a result, he is relevant as a participant in the film for Wikidata and initially only for Wikidata. The fact that he played in the film is also noted in both the English and Portuguese Wikipedia articles. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]


A Meissen Porcelain Trove Is Set to Shatter Auction Records (Q108324148): news article, Bloomberg: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Data object that is not required. You can also just use the property described at URL (P973). No separate data object is required for this. Gymnicus (talk) 18:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep I don't see why any news article entry should be deleted. We have over 10,000 of them. By having them at Wikidata they can link to the people and places named in the article. I would say that no single Wikidata entry is "required". --RAN (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Q108302059: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Mohamed Belgazem (talk) 18:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  •   Delete not linked to other items or sites.--So9q (talk) 12:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[]


La procréation médicalement assistée examinée... avant l’été ! (Q108299619): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Relevance not shown Gymnicus (talk) 19:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]


Q108299625: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Relevance not shown Gymnicus (talk) 19:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]


NN (Q105816905): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty --- Jura 19:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[]
We are not a genealogy site, so such data objects are not wanted here, at least from my point of view.   Delete --Gymnicus (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
1. There are books mentions such person even if her name is unknown and 2. We can link this entry with other databases.--GZWDer (talk) 14:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
@GZWDer: Even if it is not listed as such in the property person ID (P1819), I see it that way that an entry in this projects not means relevance. For me, this property is just like the property IMDb ID (P345) a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). --Gymnicus (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[]
  • What statements would there be to make? I don't see any at Q105816905. Having an item like NN Wharton (Q104033503) seems more useful, as it allows to link a person to their grandparent. --- Jura 13:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Bagno Egisto (Q33325321): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a strand, but a seaside resort Mannivu (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]

@Mannivu: You have to say that on and not here. As long as the article exists in, this data object cannot be deleted. --Gymnicus (talk) 14:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@Gymnicus thank you, I've requested the deletion on Mannivu (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Basheer Al-Harethi (Q81939561): News announcer And presenter Tv: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item does not achieve any noticeable! Osps7 (talk) 12:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]

  Keep A Yemenite with 100.000 followers seems notable considered in context. --Frlgin (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@Frlgin: Which part of WD:N could apply here? --Emu (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@Emu:@Osps7: WD:N is about inclusion, not exclusion. This is always assumed that if an existing item does not meet WD:N it shall be excluded, but this is nowhere stated explicitly. So if one finds an item that doesn't meet WD:N, but is not obviously SEO or wrong, just let it be.
@Emu: Anyways, the subject has many followers in perspective to the population size and internet availability in Yemen and as anchorman he is a public figure,so WD:N:2. I added 3 different websites as references, although I'm not a speaker of Arabic. And this is the thing: There is no general notability, relevance is always in context. But I as a European cannot judge a context from middle east very well. Can Osps7 do it? Nobody knows, but it seems way too easy to shout 'Not notable!' without further arguments and burden every passerby with the burden of proof.
Sorry @Osps7:, I just checked your profile and saw you are very well competent to judge Arabic contexts. So please elaborate. To me Basheer Al-Harethi seems pretty famous. E.g. when compared to on of the best known German anchormans, Claus Kleber who has about 4 times more Twitter followers in a country 3 times the population which is not currently at war. Maybe also @Al-Dandoon: and @OsamaK: want to chime in. --Frlgin (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@Frlgin: I’m sorry, but that’s not true. You are talking about notability on de.wp (“Relevanzkriterien“) that are indeed about inclusion, not exclusion. That’s not the case with Wikidata: WD:N are the definitive answer to the question what can stay in Wikidata. Follower counts aren’t generally considered to be “serious and publicly available references” (they can be easily manipulated anyway). PS: Pinging doesn’t work without signature --Emu (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[]
WD:N are not the definitive answer but

intentionally left a bit vague. In case of disagreement over the notability of an item, you can launch a request for deletion. The final decision is always up to the community.

Fortunately we're having a discussion now. Although I feel it being a bit derailed, which I started of course. Thanks for mentioning the ping thing. --Frlgin (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Deletion requests for individual sciencesEdit

Discussion common to the items listed above and belowEdit

No context Jarnsax (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]

It may be that the data object only has one statement. But as far as I know, this is not a reason for deletion, especially not if the data object has a structural use.   Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 07:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Environment and Management (Q64811468): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Gymnicus not a class, so every statement on it is wrong. Is this a degree program, is about the field of work covered by Journal of Environmental Management (Q15757726), or is it an interdisciplinary field combining the study of management with the study of the environment? Jarnsax (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Hell, it could even be about the 'social environment' created through management practices. Jarnsax (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


International Business and Marketing (Q64809896): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

'subclass of academic discipline' is wrong. This was probably meant as either the name of a degree program, or as an interdisciplinary field. Kinda dislike the idea of 'hijacking' items, deleting every claim on them, and turning them into something that I guess was what the original creator meant, especially when there are multiple possibilities. Jarnsax (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Vernacular Language (Cook Islands Máori) (Q64808276): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Gymnicus Similar to the one below, I don't think this is an academic field. If anything, it's the name of some (unidentifiable) degree program somewhere. The study of Cook Islands Máori would be a branch of linguistics. Jarnsax (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Sustainable Development in Small Island States (Q64811167): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Gymnicus I don't think this is an academic field. If anything, it's the name of some (unidentifiable) degree program somewhere. Jarnsax (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Accounting Studies (Q64809581): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Gymnicus: Trying to sort this one out, I think it is (or should be), a deconvolved equivalent of accounting (Q4116214), as in, "Accounting Studies (Q64809581) is an instance (not subclass) of 'academic discipline' that has the 'field of work' accounting (Q4116214) (and probably the 'name' accounting as well)" Jarnsax (talk) 19:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Police Management (Q64806550): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Gymnicus: Might be able to fix this as an interdisciplinacy field combining police science (Q37445) and a version of management (Q2920921) that deconflates the activity and it's study. Jarnsax (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Pacific Vernacular Language (Q64800627): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Gymnicus The conceptual problem I see here is that the implied subject is a subclass of area studies (Q928786), but it's ill-defined... is this about 'pacific' languages in the sense of 'spoken in the Pacific region' (which would include Japanese, Tagalog, etc) or is this about Polynesian (Q390979)? Oceanic (Q324457)? Google doesn't indicate, to me at least, that "Pacific Vernacular Languages" itself exists as 'a thing' other than possibly the name of some academic program somewhere in some language. Jarnsax (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[]


Fishery and Aquaculture (Q55693892): Fishery and Aquaculture: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Valid as an instance of academic discipline (Q11862829) (not subclass) with fishing and aquaculture (Q28778386) as it's field of work, perhaps? 19:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)