Wolverène

Trattini

Ciao, quale trattino devo mettere? Quello corto o quello lungo per poterlo inserire tra l'anno di nascita e di morte. Pizzaedo (talk) 11:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

• Usually we're using '-' (hyphen) or '–' (en dash), I guess you may use either? If I understand you properly. --Wolverène (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for your help. Pizzaedo (talk) 12:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

In Italian pages we're using '-' (hyphen) in agreement with an user. Pizzaedo (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Placing a Freebase link or knowledge format diagram in Wikidata

Hello, how can I find the freebase link or artist knowledge format diagram in google and put it in wikidata. I copied Google several times but it didn't work in Wikidata. Thank you for your guidance David jazes (talk) 09:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

• Hello David, this link is helpful. I'm not sure what a diagram is, if you mean Google Knowledge graphs, they can be found there too. :) Best regards, --Wolverène (talk) 10:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

For example, this is the link of the artist panel in Google, I want to put it in Wikidata 👉👉 https://g.co/kgs/2EuRSF 👉👉 Q113708516 Can you edit it??David jazes (talk)

Or for example this link /m/01qcxmf I want to edit like this link and put it in wikidataDavid jazes (talk)

Hello again, we can't add here the link to the panel itself. I added the link to the Knowledge Graph, the panel can be seen soon while following the link in the item, along with other searching results. Also note that you can't implement the creation of a Freebase entry since 2015 (I guess?), all Freebase entries are now working in the same way as Google knowledge graphs are doing. --Wolverène (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

P.S. Not on the issue we're discussing here, I just want to note that Q113708516 is nominated for deletion by one of our sysops. Strongly recommended to you as an interested editor to learn more about the notability policy in order to try to prevent the deletion. Best regards, --Wolverène (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Give your opinion and vote https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikiquote:Votes_for_deletion/Siavash_Shahsavari Cyrus danesh (talk)

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

Dear Wolverène,

I hope you are doing well,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I am working on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits. Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study should take no more than 15 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link

Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

• Hello. I've just filled the form at Google Docs, and waiting for the further actions. :) --Wolverène (talk) 04:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Admin-ship

Have you considered applying for adminship? I'd nominate you if you wanted. Seems like it'd be good if you could block vandals / delete obvious spam without asking for help. BrokenSegue (talk) 17:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

• Hello. Wow, that would be great if I was nominated! Actually I had a plan to apply for adminship somewhen in a month but what are we waiting for? :) Thanks in advance. --Wolverène (talk) 18:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

English | español | français | Nederlands | русский | +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our gift is better than the one at Commons or Meta)

Here's your badge: {{User admin}}/{{#babel:admin}} and {{Admin topicon}}. Enjoy!

Congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Wikidata. Please take a moment to read the Wikidata:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Wikidata:Project chat, Wikidata:Requests for comment, and Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikidata-admin^connect. If you need access, you can flag someone down at #wikidata^connect. You may find Wikidata:Guide to Adminship to be useful reading. You may also want to consider adding yourself to meta:Template:Wikidata/Ambassadors, and to any similar page on your home wiki if one exists. (Check Wikipedia:Wikidata/Wikidatans (Q14964498).)

Please also add/update the languages you speak to your listing at Wikidata:List of administrators and Wikidata:Administrators/Timeline. You may also like to add your username to this list if you would not like that items you delete at RfD get marked as deleted automatically. Again, welcome to the admin corps!

--Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! A big honour for me. I promise to work for the good of Wikidata. :) --Wolverène (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

I also want to congratulate here on your promotion as a new admin :-) Killerkürbis (talk) 21:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks 😊 --Wolverène (talk) 03:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Pornofilmy

Hi Wolverène,

Saberov is listed at Discogs. I can't tell which user has entered it. Best-- U. M. Owen (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Saberov is infamous in the Russian-speaking Internet segment as a blatant self-promoter, so if he really played in a couple of gigs with Pornofilmy (I even assume it), he might easily proclaimed self as the band's regular member. This is by no means a direct accusation, sure. Pornofilmy is a Russia's well-known punk rock band, if he were a real member it'd be easy to check. Well, about the fake info on Discogs, I'm going to try to remove it... I have an account there but used it literally once or twice last year so I am also wondering if remember the password. :) Regards, --Wolverène (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Mgb0ssi

Looks like user Mgb0ssi is doing problematic edits again. Since you dealt with him last time, I figured you might prefer handling it. Thanks. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Looked just like the user was sorry about the incorrect usage of autoEdit, so I gave them a chance. I've warned them for the last time. --Wolverène (talk) 18:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Language assistance needed

Hi there! Just wondering, would you be able to take a look at this report in the admin noticeboard? The reporter approached me for assistance because their previous report was archived without an answer. Unfortunately, I don't speak Russian and the issue seems too complex to rely on automated translation; I guess it would be better to have it handled by someone who does speak the language. Thank you! :) –FlyingAce^✈hello 06:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I've responded there but the problem has roots in a regional conflict (not very serious but still), and it's not enough to be a Russian speaker to be able to deal with it definitely. :) Regards, --Wolverène (talk) 22:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

P.S. In the case if Simba16 won't respond to us at WD:AN within a week, I'll make a decision that I'd believe to be optimal. --Wolverène (talk) 10:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

The issue with Estibalitz Jalón (Q23907933)

Hello! As you have noticed User:Udazkena (aka User:Udazkena.1) is blanking Estibalitz Jalón (Q23907933). The problem is that this person is herself, and doesn't want any information to be displayed in the automatic template at eu:Estibalitz Jalón, where she has tried many times to delete referenced information of (look at eu:Eztabaida:Estibalitz_Jalón. She claims that the only information about her work should be the one provided by her web, and that we should only show things approved by herself at any given moment. Now she is also trying to blank information here, and to change content of images at Commons. Thanks for protecting the page. Theklan (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Lo que estás diciendo es absolutamente falso. Esta página tiene casi diez años y ha estado sin actualizarse desde que se creó. Hace unos días se os pidió que, por favor, eliminarais la página, ya que la persona de la que estáis hablando ya no ejerce su trabajo de forma pública, ella tampoco lo es y no quiere verse expuesta y, casualidad, empezáis a escribir sin conocimiento. Además, se os ha estado informando de forma privada de que la información que estáis poniendo está mal,tergiversada o desactualizada, y aun así seguís escribiendo lo que os parece, sin veracidad alguna, sabiendo de antemano cual es la real. También podéis consultarlo, antes de escribirlo, y no lo hacéis. Y os recordamos que existen para todos unos derechos digitales, que no estáis respetando. 90.166.54.65 06:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Quod erat demostrandum. Theklan (talk) 06:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Así es, pero no por tu parte. Tenemos todos los emails que se te han mandado y lo que ella os ha dicho tanto de forma pública como privada. Y repetimos; existen unos derechos digitales que deben ser respetados. Mejor explícales qué intereses tenéis para no dejar que una persona se marche, cuando su página no la habéis tocado en años; por lo tanto, informar poco a informado a nadie. 90.166.54.65 07:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Q186347

Hello,

should I write in Esperanto or do you prefer messages in English? I wonder why you changed the esperanto label in d:Q186347 from "karavanejo" to "karananserajo"... As far as I know, there is no such word as "karananserajo" in Esperanto, and "karavanejo" is the only right term. In Esperanto, as in every language, it's not appropriate just to invent words by yourself. So, if you think "karananserajo" is an acceptable term in Esperanto, please quote some dictionary entries showing so.

Mi certas ke vi havis bonan intencon, kaj mi ne estas ĉagrena, sed vi simple eraris, laŭ mia opinio. ThomasPusch (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Saluton! Mi ne parolas Esperanton regule, nun mi volus paroli la anglan. Mi ŝatus daŭre lerni Esperanton, sed poste. You may see what I actually fixed - [1] - the letter 'K' was changed from capital to lowercase. I admit I was not confused by the spelling 'karavanserajo', it looked plausible but I never really knew if it was correct or not... I do not mind if 'karavanejo' must be the principal (or even the only) correct Esperanto name for the term. Best regards, --Wolverène (talk) 05:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Q122782472

Hello, I just realized that the item (Q122782472) was deleted. I remember that i talked on providing more source but i got busy.

Could you check if any of these is a source? Some are in other language but they can be translated easily

https://trademarks.justia.com/979/34/lysee-97934804.html

https://uspto.report/company/Pimentel-Vicel

https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/pimentel-vicel-5526607/

https://www.discountmags.com/au/magazine/latino-sleb-october-1-2023-digital/in-this-issue/33

https://listindiario.com/entretenimiento/20231213/lysee-dominicana-da-voz-temas-series-netflix-hulu-disney-plus_786753.html

https://teleradioamerica.com/2023/12/dominicanas-dando-voz-al-tema-de-las-series-lysee-netflix-hulu-y-disney-plus/ Daremize (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

@Wolverène i awaits your response Daremize (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

This appears to be the only source I could recommend as a serious reference. What do you think, Emu?.. --Wolverène (talk) 23:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, that’s probably enough. I restored the item. Thank you, Wolverène. --Emu (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Q13179595

Просьба не путать сущности: мировое христианство и христианство на Земле (Q13179595). Первое - объёмнее, потому что на МКС есть православные иконы и периодически бывают православные, а МКС Землёй не является. Если нужен элемент Мировое христианство, то создайте. Ыфь77 (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Противопоставление "христианства на Земле" и "христианства в мире" выглядит как минимум избыточным, поскольку за пределами нашей планеты не существует постоянных христианских поселений, церквей, не печатаются Библии, не существует регулирования вопросов религии. Даже если на МКС есть какие-то молельные комнаты (в теории - я не знаю), противопоставлять их целой Румынии или любой другой стране - это сильно. И православные космонавты на МКС являются землянами, и работают в интересах земных государств и организаций.
"Христианство на Земле" звучит примерно так же, как "Масонство на Луне". Как известно, один из двух первых человек, ступавших на поверхность Луны, Базз Олдрин, является масоном, какие выводы мы могли бы из этого сделать?.. --Wolverène (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

1) Не утрируйте, это не противопоставление, а несоответствие. Разделение Земли и Мира в культуре существует уже с прошлого века - сколько выполнено (именно выполнено!) научных работ в космосе и на других планетах, сколько фильмов, включая художественных (хотя бы впомните российскую "космоактрису"), сделано вне биосферы Земли. Вы думаете за время существования станции Мир и МКС там не выработалась своя билингва? Это несоответствие наследуют все части культуры, включая искусство, религию и прочее. Его же я закрепил в элементах Викиданных (Q13152690, Q13198592 и Q13150034). 2) Мне для работы в ВД нужны элементы-контейнеры именно для Земли, чтобы отделить географические составляющие классов от всех остальных. Пример: христианство у монголов (Q5110478) в мировое христианство входит, а в христианство на Земле в общем случае - уже нет, потому что негеографический элемент у географического класса быть не должен. --Ыфь77 (talk) 20:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

3) Сейчас на Луне масонов нет, а вот православные иконы на МКС летают. И внеземная наука и прикладное искусство есть и продолжают развиваться - та же телесъёмка поверхности Луны производится во время написания ответа. --Ыфь77 (talk) 20:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Спасибо за аргументы, склонен даже согласиться. Тогда, с вашего позволения, внесу эти правки для соблюдения единообразия. --Wolverène (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Если Вы посмотрите на языковой шаблон на моей ЛС, то увидите, что языковой континуум, окромя 3 языков, мне не доступен. Поэтому онлайн-переводчики - наше всё. Ыфь77 (talk) 20:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Обращаюсь к Вашему опыту. Мне нужен элемент-контейнер наподобие Q13179595 для культур по этнической группе, потому что там много элементов зависли без надклассов: а) нужен ли? б) как назвать? в) как перевести на мировые языки, чтобы не возникало путаницы, г) в каких отношениях он будет с Q13179595? --Ыфь77 (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

@Ыфь77: Извините, что так долго отвечал, то одно то другое... Правильно я понимаю, структуризацию вы предлагаете примерно по такой схеме: культура России → культура России на Земле/в космосе -> культура России в мире? Я всё же не уверен, что такое детальное структурирование данных не вызовет вопросов. Если не включать в критерий этнос/национальность, то получается всё достаточно оправданно. То есть культура России (культура русских) → культура Европы/Азии → культура на Земле → культура мира. Для детализации на этносы предлагаю начать обсуждение на форуме (русскоязычном или лучше общем) и прийти к какому-то консенсусу.

По остальному. По-русски можно сказать ... на Земле (противопоставляя ... в космосе). По-английски лучше of Earth, потому что on Earth звучит несколько не конкретно, on the Earth предполагает чёткую привязку к поверхности Земли, in the Earth - как будто что-то происходит внутри планеты. С другими языками надо смотреть со словарём, в том же испанском de la Tierra (тот же смысл). Q13179595 (христианство на Земле) будет определяться как аспект (instance of) сущности религия на Земле, она в свою очередь как аспект культура на Земле. --Wolverène (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Но с христианством лучше Christianity on Earth. --Wolverène (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Я абсолютно не это имел в виду, поэтому и отделил разделы. Есть русская культура (культура русских как народа / этнической группы, Q71194656), которая является подклассом славянской культуры (Q66049360), которая подклассом должна быть, но не может, потому что нет соответствующего элемента в ВД (или я его не нашёл). Это подвопрос (а). Остальные подвопросы вроде бы после объяснения должны быть понятны. Ыфь77 (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Ответвление в лингвистическую сторону. Я вообще ничего не противопоставлял, создавая Христианство на Земли, я лишь объединял все географические элементы в один подкласс, всё что не касается географии и поверхности Земли (в пределах биосферы), в такое объединение не входит. Насколько я понял из вашего объяснения Christianity of the Earth -- самый точный перевод этого значения на англицкий. Ыфь77 (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Ещё мелкая просьба: подавите вики-ссылку на элемент, через полмесяца она будет неактуально, а в ссылках элемента она будет болтаться всё его время существование. Ыфь77 (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Почему бы в Q66049360 не перенести culture of Europe (Q1377906) и culture of Asia (Q149806) из part of (P361) в subclass of (P279)? Тогда структура не будет поломана. Если остаётся part of (P361), то тогда в culture of Europe (Q1377906) и culture of Asia (Q149806) по идее должно быть свойство has part(s) (P527) с длинным перечислением европейских/азиатских культур, чего делать не предполагается. А культура славян действительно подкласс культур соответствующих континентов. --Wolverène (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

... тогда в Q71194656 не будет стоять предупреждение "Slavic culture should have a statement subclass of." (или как там по-русски) --Wolverène (talk) 18:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Здесь несколько аргументов против. 1) Возможно я искренне заблуждаюсь, но я привык воспринимать подкласс ВД как сущность математики (множество) и программирования (подкласс из ООП), т. е. не должно быть элементов подкласса, не входящих в любой уровень родительских надклассов. В категориях рувики это называется транзитивность, так вот отношение подкласс-надкласс должны быть абсолютно транзитивны. Вы предлагаете грубо её нарушить 2) Произойдёт множество включений негеографических элементов в географические элементы. Если один раз ещё такое можно простить, то множественное включение - очень плохо. Ыфь77 (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Отношение в ВД "является частью" я не отношу к абсолютно транзитивным. Ыфь77 (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

По мне, "часть от" - тоже транзитивное свойство. Ещё мелкая просьба: ставьте ссылки на элементы - 1) удобно переходить из беседы, чтобы посмотреть, о чём речь; 2) удобно из элемента получать список всех дискуссий об этом элементе. А "замусоренность" "ссылок сюда" вообще не проблема - легко фильтруется, если надо. --Infovarius (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Тогда найдите свойство, которое опишет частично транзитивные отношения: часть А есть часть Б, но Б по объёму больше. Свойство "частично совпадает с" (P1382) не предлагать, потому что здесь должны быть вертикальные отношения, а не горизонтальные. Ыфь77 (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

И просьба не отвлекать от основного вопроса раздела: нужен ли главный элемент-контейнер для культур по этнической группе, и если нужен, то какой он должен быть. У меня уже есть вариант, но хотелось бы увидеть другие мнения. Ыфь77 (talk) 14:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

А у нас нету элемента "культура по этнической группе"? Его бы можно поставить в P31 для них. А нужен ли P279, я не уверен. --Infovarius (talk) 10:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Как метакласс - есть. UPD: нужен, потому что этнические группы свойством P279 обладают, следовательно иерархия есть. Ыфь77 (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Controversial Alexei Navalny (Q155979) edits

There is no need to remove such statements, as it directly aligns with Wikidata guidelines. Please refer to the following Wikidata policies (bolding made by me):

Marking erroneous statements as deprecated instead of simply deleting such statements has three benefits:

3. it pholds and establishes the integrity of Wikidata as a secondary knowledge base (that collects and links to references), rather than a primary database of facts. Wikidata simply provides information according to specific sources; those sources may or may not reflect contemporary thought or scientific consensus.

• Source: Help:Ranking

Qualifiers therefore contribute to Wikidata's flexibility as a platform and its ability to support a plurality of perspectives, including data which may provide contradicting information. In case of disputes, community consensus ultimately determines the value of a property, however other points of views can be added as additional values using qualifiers as well as sources. Please note that just as Wikipedia does not publish original research or content representing the beliefs of its editors, Wikidata does not allow contributions that reflect personal stances or opinions, nor does it tolerate edit warring over statement values.

• Source: Wikidata:Verifiability

Assessing usefulness is subjective, and each user should decide whether to trust one source over another.

Please note that I will revert these edits as controversial and disruptive after 48 hours to avoid initiating an edit war. Arjun Sàjeev (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

@Arjun Sàjeev: First of all, I didn't mean that the value was errorneous, I meant it was reduntant and "does not make much sense for us" (c).

If there is a person was born on June 4, 1976, we will have different options of how can the date of birth be represented: 1) 4 June 1976, 2) 1976, 3) June 1976; all of these three can be surely proven by sources. Also, some sources may list the day of birth only, or may not show the date of birth but within the context it might've been clear that the person started living in the XX century, thus we can get the value 4) 20. century. It would be superfluous to list all of these values although none of these ones are incorrect.

Preferred and deprecated ranks might be good if we knew that there are sources which question the person's day of birth, or even the whole date of birth. In very this case and as far as I know, sources are more-less agree that Mr Navalny was born on June 4, 1976, and if one of the many databases displays just the year, for an unclear reason like code restrictions or another, we can neglect a database entry as a source for birthdate as incomplete and/or excessive for referencing.

For what have been bolded:

Marking erroneous statements as deprecated instead of simply deleting -- We did not have an issue about the deprecated rank, and no one says that any property values are erroneous.

Your understanding of Wikidata as a secondary knowledge base that collects the references is too literal, like if we should add a myriad of values for every property within an item, including those with typos or unintentional inaccuracies, just because of presence of at least one reference. For example, in practice we still do not seek to add literally all of the variants of romanization of the name "Алексей Анатольевич Навальный", incl. IPA-based one, letter-by-letter transliterations, obviously errorneous romanization styles, derogatory misrepresentations of the his name used by political opponents, etc.

other points of views can be added as additional values using qualifiers as well as sources -- Not the real case of POV ambiguity. He was our contemporary so we know detailedly his date of birth from his personal statements or state registers

Wikidata does not allow contributions that reflect personal stances or opinions -- Off topic?

Assessing usefulness is subjective, and each user should decide whether to trust one source over another. -- OK, if X is incomplete information and Y is complete information, X and Y may be both trustful, but X and Y are not the same valuable. Sorry but it looks like you are outraged of my edits while being misunderstood the meaning of them.

The removal of reduntant values is not a clear violation and can just hardly be labeled as 'controversial' and 'disruptive'. Can I give you a hint on what may be considered controversial? Things like: I) bolding cited parts of policies in a semi-public message that looks like an attempt to use a condescending or didactic manner, II) assuming bad-faith ("...revert ... in 48 hours ... to avoid initiating an edit war" although it's not obvious if I am intending to initiate one), III) assuming that a user (be it newcomer or sysop) does something disruptive in spite of the other contributions seemed to be clearly constructive, with an attempt to present the very own vision of policies as the only correct.

Do not worry, I am not going to initiate the edit-war even if you revert the edits right now and call them un-God-ly disruptive. In fact, this does not look like a reason for dispute and mutual accusations, although ... depends on an individual. :-] --Wolverène (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Polish noble family (Q115867377)

Hello sir. I would like to ask you for help in creating a redirect from Polish noble family (Q115867377) to Szlachta family (Q27062351) because they are exactly the same subjects that are simply named differently. Polish noble family (Q115867377) is not linked to any subpage. Thank you very much. Heroldicas (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello. To merge the items in very this case, I would've had some understanding of the history of Poland, I am afraid mine is (at best) somewhat superficial.
As far as I see it, 'Polish noble family' may be related to the noble families settled in Poland disregard of cultural/ethnical identity, while 'Szlachta family' may be related to the families of the specific noble estate known as Szlachta, disregard of the territory (Lithuania, ...).
If we define the sameness of 'Polish noble family' and 'Szlachta family', we should also say that 1) any noble family that relocated to Poland (within any historical boundaries) from another lands was automatically regarded as a Szlachta family, 2) any noble family of the Polish descent that relocated to another lands, especially far from the Eastern Europe also stopped belonging to the Szlachta. This all probably sounds incorrect. We could divide nobility both ways, by country and by cultural ties, without mixing concepts.
But then again, I am reasoning as a person with somewhat poor knowledge of the Polish history. Would not you like to consult the Polish-speaking community first? Wikidata:Kafejka. --Wolverène (talk) 06:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

I'll do that. Thank you for your time and have a nice day! Heroldicas (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Same to you. --Wolverène (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Requests for permissions ab.

I applied through this link https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Other_rights#DrowssapSMM but I guess I couldn't do it. :( --Quiklav (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I have fixed/formatted your request. --Wolverène (talk) 03:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

ruwiki

Hola @Wolverène Could you check this supposed template on Russian wiki, please? спасибо. Madamebiblio (talk) 12:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Buen día, I have fixed the template and merged the WD items. :) --Wolverène (talk) 03:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Bot request

Hello you've been asked for feedback at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Bot_requests#The_nl_descriptions_lacking_the_space_sign_(2023-11-02) Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I am going to respond later. --Wolverène (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Empty/Blank items

What do we do with unlinked blank items like Q125523037? Thanks - Da Lamb^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 08:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Technically such pages comply with the rules, see WD:N criterion 3. The village of Vuhly (Q20465835) was a part of Bobynichi Volost (Q125523037) until 1924 (the start of the Soviet rule).
Volost is an analogue of subdistrict or township, I guess...
Also, I could suggest to add this historical source (list of volost's in Vitebsk region).
What do we do? It just may be expanded, there is nothing 'criminally' wrong with these items. Such items are also not completely empty. --Wolverène (talk) 08:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Don’t care bye! See other post. Thanks - Da Lamb^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 08:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I have responded to you there. I have nothing more to say. --Wolverène (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

P.S. I see that literally nobody cares, just a record for the history -- the item was created just two hours ago and looks like there is still a work on it. --Wolverène (talk) 10:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Timeline template and Item Documentation

I saw you put {{Timeline}} template on a person template recently. Maybe it is more appropriate to generalize that a bit and push it into {{Item documentation}} somewhere so that it appears on all person's talk page ? author  TomT0m / talk page 13:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

In fact, I just did not want to leave the talk page empty. I would rather delete the talk page, I am not quite sure if this template was really helpful for somebody. --Wolverène (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

My 10th Anniversary

It's been exactly 10 years since I joined Wikidata and Wikipedia. The reason to congratulate myself on this! 🎉 --Wolverène (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)