https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sultans_of_the_Seljuq_Empire ve https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%BCy%C3%BCk_Sel%C3%A7uklu_sultanlar%C4%B1_listesi bu maddeyi birleştirebilir misin?
User talk:HakanIST
Merhaba, önce Farsça Vikipedi üzerindeki sayfaların birleştirilmesi ya da ayrı konular hakkındalarsa başka bir öğeye bağlanması gerekiyor.
Hello, please explain the deletion.
Concerning Wikidata:Notability
"It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references."
This in my view fulfilled. But I can add more references to other sources if needed (newspapers, governmental sites), but that would not be in English, but in German or Bulgarian language.
as noted in the nomination (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&diff=1061602902&oldid=1061602575), i didn't offer an opinion as to whether it should be kept or not. but I did ask that someone look into what was going on with the item and its edits. The item was created with a WP article linked for its very first edit. Yet, somehow that article now points to a newer WD item. Doesn't that seem backwards? And, if memory serves, it only became an empty item today because the nominator moved the link to the other item.
Hello, @Quakewoody, item Q10512399 was an instance of Wikimedia disambiguation page, new item is not. This is because the page on svwiki was deleted and replaced with a new page that's no longer a disambiguation page.
ok. that explains it. that's all i needed.
Hello. What happened to this item?
Just curious, what was Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2019/11/07#Q55583764? Somehow your deletion doesn't display the former label as done by other admins.
It's label was "Anis Alamgir"
I was going to say I have no idea who that is (probably a batch creation of mine), but I found c:Category:Anis Alamgir.
Did the requester delete the sitelink prior to deletion? If so, I'd favor restoring it. Removing sitelinks prior to listing for deletion is misleading.
I don't actually know of the person is notable. Based on statements, it might have appeared on w:User:ZI Jony/Missing Articles.
Requester hasn't deleted commons link prior to deletion but enwiki link was deleted. I don't see any notability, but I'll investigate further.
It seems there were two deletion requests at enwiki before ..
If the person was the editor (not a editor) of Q31725330, I'd think they would be sufficiently notable. Usual enwiki bias ?
Share your experience in this survey
Hi V7p6xpib2628acnd,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi V72pe3e0m2ie9wzw,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you commented at the above RFC. There are additional proposals that have been made there that you are welcome to comment on. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC) (for Rschen7754)
Please help me understand what happened with this Data Item? Until yesterday, it used to list all necessary information about a subject. Today the Entity has just vanished without any explanation *confused*
The reason was given as ''Empty". It seems someone emptied all the details & immediately requested for deletion.