Single best value constraint - humans subpage

edit

Hi! Looking at Property talk:P227/Constraint violations/Single best value constraint, I was thinking that it would be maybe useful having also a subpage Property talk:P227/Constraint violations/Single best value constraint/human limited to entities that are instance of (P31)human (Q5) (maybe extending also to pseudonym (Q61002), collective pseudonym (Q16017119), family (Q8436), or maybe not), since in fact humans (and related types of entities) are the only ones that can be reported in de:Wikipedia:GND/Fehlermeldung. BTW, I also think that we should ask DNB to have the possibility to send reports also about other types of entities through WP:GND/F (or other similar pages appositely created). --Epìdosis 14:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sure, a subpage would be useful. We asked the DNB a couple of times to expand our list but this wish was ignored. We even have problem with Typ p if the person is a musician, see de:Wikipedia Diskussion:GND/Fehlermeldung#Deutsches Musikarchiv. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi @MisterSynergy:, could MsynBot also curate this subpage for humans only (maybe extending to pseudonyms and families is just useless because they are very few cases)? Thanks! Epìdosis 07:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
This is fortunately an absurdly overengineered bot script, thus it was fairly simply to add another report: Property talk:P227/Constraint violations/Single best value constraint (only humans). It looks for P31:Q5 on the Wikidata item for inclusion on the list. —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Just for the records: The new list starts with 2,007 items. (Single best value constraint: 3,641 items.) --Kolja21 (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
The list is now at 1300 items exactly at the end of the month, with the general one at 2915 items. Epìdosis 10:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the statistics. If DNB does not provide additional staff, it will take the librarian in Frankfurt 5 months to work through the April list. (They process an average of 200 inquiries per month.) --Kolja21 (talk) 12:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
We are now below 1000. Epìdosis 08:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dupin

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/1045722464 was maybe created for Charles-Louis Du Pin (Q2958195): French military personnel, but the only connected work seems to be https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=771020996&PRS=HOL&INDEXSET=21 by https://d-nb.info/gnd/1057568015 = Charles-Louis Du Pin (Q2958195): French military personnel. Could you check? Thanks! --Epìdosis 13:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I agree. GND 1045722464 was created for Charles-Louis Du Pin: a French potographer in Japan (2011). He's not identical with Charles Dupin (Q860206): French mathematician, engineer, economist and politician (1784-1873).[1] Unfortunately, access to AKL online is currently not possible. @Ferran Mir: FYI. --Kolja21 (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
OK Ferran Mir (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
AKL online refers to Nouvelles de l'estampe (Q3345265):
  • Dupin, Charles (1840)
  • Beruf: Lithograf; Grafiker; Fotograf
  • Erwähnungsdatum: 1840
  • Erwähnungsort: Paris
  • Bibliographie: Nouvelles de l'estampe (P.) 92:1987, 4-15.
@Epìdosis: Do you have access to this journal? --Kolja21 (talk) 13:55, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
The article is Jeff Rozen, La photographie et l'estampe industrielle en France dans les années 1840 (cf.); no, I have no direct access; I can try requesting it through document delivery if you desire. Epìdosis 17:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's just the question what to do with AKL online 30187271 (GND 1045722464). Should we create a separate item? Kolja21 (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think AKL is most probably neither Charles Dupin (Q860206): French mathematician, engineer, economist and politician (1784-1873) nor Charles-Louis Du Pin (Q2958195): French military personnel, so I would propose to create a new item; if we then proof that we have to merge them, it will be easy. Epìdosis 19:11, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanx. I've created Charles Dupin (Q134391067): no description. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Updating Tn - missing GND list

edit

Hi! From https://petscan.wmcloud.org/?psid=33917931 it seems that, as of now, 1929 pages linked from Wikidata:WikiProject Authority control/Tn currently have a GND ID (P227), so they could probably be massively removed from the page; unfortunately, I'm technically not capable of performing such a massive removal. FYI @MisterSynergy:. Good night, --Epìdosis 20:51, 22 April 2025 (UTC) P.S. this evening de:Wikipedia:GND/Fehlermeldung/April 2025 surpassed 1000!Reply

Thanks for the info & sweet dreams. (The Tns will be the next major project after the duplicates.) --Kolja21 (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
BTW: In German Wikipedia there are still 2,096 Tns that already have a valid GND. We decided to keep them unless at least one title is connected with the GND. (If there is no title in the DNB catalog of cause the Tn will be deleted as well.) The IDs are check by working through de:Kategorie:Wikipedia:GND fehlt. A year ago there were over 3,200 Tns so we are making good progress. --Kolja21 (talk) 03:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

WikiCite 2025

edit

Hi, I am reaching out to all users listed on the page listing ways for reporting errors to external databases, which I co-created last year.

As a main organizer of Wikicite 2025 I share my role in the academic committe with two other users who have edit access to external databases, and this topic holds significant interest for me. Consequently, I am keen on proposing a discussion space (in English) at the event (at least in the online component) centered on data round-tripping and the crucial role of Wikidata volunteers as intermediaries between third-party institutions and the broader community.

Let me know if you would like to participate, there is no discussion space for proposal yet but I would like to gather some usernames if there is an active interest. Just reply in my talk page or tag me here, so I can take note if you are interested. Alexmar983 (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alessandro, sure I'm interested but I don't know yet if I have time. If possible, I would like to attend the conference in person in Bern. --Kolja21 (talk) 22:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Noted. The next organizing committee session is on Tuesday. I hope to share some feedback as soon as possible.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
You can attend. The room is covered by WMCH, as User:Ilario confirmed at the last meeting. Please start clearing your schedule at the last days of August and book the train tickets around the secondo half of this Month. As a valuable member at the community level, you can stay for the full three days, and your travel choices are mostly based on your needs. You could arrive on Thursday or Friday (in that case, skipping the introductory part of the conference in the morning) and leave on Sunday or early Monday. Since you’re not one of the organizers, I’d suggest planning a stay needing three bedroom nights instead of four. However, that’s just a recommendation, not a strict rule.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I'm impressed. I didn't know WMCH would cover the costs. --Kolja21 (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

David Lyon

edit

I have made a report about the two GNDs in David Gordon Lyon (Q5234260): American theologian (1852–1935); I don't know if it is useful to note also that most of the works connected to the second belong in fact to David Lyon (Q5236868): British sociologist. Thanks! --Epìdosis 07:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

You mean titles in other libraries? No, the DNB doesn't take the time to inform them about wrong linked titles. --Kolja21 (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Hahn (Q94860917)

edit

Hi Kolja21, bei oben genannter/genannten Person/Personen bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob es sich um dieselbe handelt; der Name stimmt nicht zu 100% überein (Joseph vs. Josef), vor allem war der eine aber Textilarbeiter, der andere Elektriker. Da der Name nicht besonders außergewöhnlich erscheint, halte ich es für möglich, dass eine der zugrundeliegenden Quellen ("Wer war wer in der DDR?" bzw. Nachlassdatenbank Bundesarchiv) zwei Personen vermischt hat. Daher hatte ich das so modelliert, was sicher nicht ideal war. Wenn sich die Diskrepanz mit dem Beruf irgendwie auflösen lässt, würde ich auch sicher von Identität der Personen ausgehen. Hast du dazu evtl. noch etwas gefunden? VG Dorades (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Dorades, für die verknüpften Titel würde ich nicht meine Hand ins Feuer legen, aber GND 1024991318 bezieht sich eindeutig auf den SED-Funktionär. Name + Geburtsjahr + Todesjahr + Beruf Elektriker + Leiter der Zentrag. (Handbuch der Deutschen Kommunisten: "… lernte Elektriker und arbeitete vor dem Weltkrieg in einer Textilmaschinenfabrik in der Schweiz.") Wenn du noch mehr mehr Übereinstimmungen willst, schau' in die angegebene Quelle "Das Bundesarchiv, Zentrale Datenbank Nachlässe": "SPD (1914), USPD (1917) … Leiter (1954) der Zentrag." Dass in einem Nachlass zwei Personen vermischt sind, wäre sehr ungewöhnlich, und die Daten geben keinen Hinweis darauf. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Den zweiten Eintrag bei der Bundesstiftung Aufarbeitung (https://www.bundesstiftung-aufarbeitung.de/de/recherche/kataloge-datenbanken/biographische-datenbanken/joseph-sepp-hahn) aus dem "Handbuch der Deutschen Kommunisten" hatte ich tatsächlich übersehen, aber da ergeben sich ja noch mehr Unstimmigkeiten:
  1. "Sohn eines Hausdieners; lernte Elektriker und arbeitete vor dem Weltkrieg in einer Textilmaschinenfabrik in der Schweiz" vs. "Vater Textilarb.; Volks- u. Fortbildungsschule für Textil in Hof, Leipzig u. Mittweida; 1909 – 12 Ausbildung in einer Baumwollspinnerei in Hof (Saale); ab 1911 Jugendriege im Arbeitersport Hof, später Chemnitz-Leipzig; 1912 – 24 Dt. Textilarbeiterverb., ausgeschl.; 1912 SPD-Jugend in Hof; 1914 – 17 SPD in Chemnitz u. Leipzig, dann USPD" (Vater mit anderem Beruf, eigener Beruf wie oben schon erwähnt anders, in "Wer war wer ..." kein Schweizaufenthalt)
  2. "Bei Kriegsbeginn eingezogen, 1917 wurde er als Kriegsgegner wegen Gehorsamsverweigerung zu zwölf Jahren Festung verurteilt. Durch die Revolution 1918 aus der Festung Passau befreit." vs. "1915 – 17 Kriegsdienst in Frankreich, Gefangenschaft; 1916 Kriegsgericht Brüssel, zu neun Jahren Festung in Passau verurteilt wegen »Flugblattverteilens«, Nov. 1918 entlassen"
Danach weitestgehend gleich. Könnte auch an ungenauen Quellen der Biographien liegen, Identität scheint mir aber für die frühen Lebensjahre zunehmend fragwürdig. Auf die Nachlassdatenbank hatte ich mich ja oben schon bezogen und die Angaben sollten natürlich stimmen, so ein Nachlass enthält mitunter ja aber auch Biographien der Person aus anderer Hand, insofern würde ich so einer Biographie in 4 Zeilen nur begrenzten Wert zumessen. --Dorades (talk) 21:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Schau' dir noch mal die Dublette an, die du angelegt hast. Identifikatoren:
  • GND-Kennung: 1024991318
  • Bundesstiftung Aufarbeitung Personen ID: joseph-sepp-hahn
Diesen Datensatz stehen zu lassen, mit der Begründung, dass es in den biographischen Artikeln Unstimmigkeiten gibt, hilft nicht weiter, sondern schafft nur Verwirrung.
Als Arbeitshypothese, von Unstimmigkeiten in den Quellen auf eine (bislang rein fiktive) zwei Person zu schließen, bleibt dir unbenommen, aber solange du keinen Nachweis für diese zweite Person hast, reicht es nur für einen Vermerk auf der Diskussionsseite.
Und natürlich können Quellen Fehler enthalten, aber die behebt man nicht, indem man einen Datensatz doppelt anlegt, sondern indem man einzelne Aussagen überprüft und diese als korrekt oder widerlegt markiert. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Dass die Modellierung, wie sie nach meiner letzten Bearbeitung war, Verwirrung geschaffen hat, kann ich nachvollziehen. Nur: Das Lesen der zugrundliegenden Quellen des WD-Items schafft auch Verwirrung, zumindest bei mir. Realistisch betrachtet werden die miteinander in Konflikt stehenden Aussagen weder auf WD geklärt werden (wer sollte das wie erledigen?) noch lassen sich durch die uns bekannten Quellen irgendwelche Aussagen als falsch zurückweisen (wir wissen ja nicht, welche falsch sind). Im Ergebnis bilden wir halt ab, was schon bekannt ist, was ja nicht falsch ist; aber die Chance, hier zumindest auf Diskrepanzen hinzuweisen, die offensichtlich sind, vertun wir so leider auch. VG --Dorades (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Für Zweifelsfälle, z.B. eine Angabe, die nicht plausibel erscheint (Diskrepanzen), gibt es die Eigenschaft cannot be confirmed by other sources (Q25895909). --Kolja21 (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Danke für den Hinweis, welche Aussagen würdest du denn bei dem Item entsprechend markieren? Es sind ja gegensätzliche Angaben zur selben Person, für die wir keine weiteren Quellen haben. --Dorades (talk) 07:30, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ich? Gar keine. Die wesentlichen Angaben stimmen überein und bislang liegt zu dem Leiter der Zentrag kein Artikel in Wikipedia vor, siehe de:VOB Zentrag. Wikidata sammelt lediglich Daten. Die inhaltlichen Diskussionen mit Bewertung der Quellen finden in der Regel in Wikipedia statt. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Wikidata sammelt lediglich Daten. Dann würden Qualifier wie der von dir genannte cannot be confirmed by other sources (Q25895909) in Wikidata aber keinen Platz haben. Da wir hier offensichtlich nicht weiterkommen, lasse ich dich damit in Ruhe; das Item bleibt dann eben, wie es ist. --Dorades (talk) 21:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Type pseudonym - bis

edit

Let's change topic. Another one: Mark Fisher (Q3849477): Canadian writer. Thanks, --Epìdosis 21:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've added the missing information (GND). VIAF 98976407 is mixing the writer with Mark Lowe Fisher (Q127472644): American architect (1953-1992). --Kolja21 (talk) 22:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
https://d-nb.info/gnd/1081031433 = Method Nečas (Q95165571): Czech/Slovak science fiction author (1878-1948) should be Person (cf. https://aleph.nkp.cz/F/?func=find-c&local_base=aut&ccl_term=ica=jk01082838). Epìdosis 08:47, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks. --Kolja21 (talk) 08:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Again Miklós Ajtay (Q12352593): Hungarian journalist and aesthetician (1899–1987), one of the two GNDs should be Pseudonym, and two should be interlinked. Epìdosis 22:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Changed to "Pseudonym" and filed a report. --Kolja21 (talk) 01:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Another one: Chigusa Kobayashi (Q11461446): Japanese writer, one of the two GNDs should be Pseudonym, and two should be interlinked. Epìdosis 17:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks for sticking with the duplicates. --Kolja21 (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Another one (maybe just request a merge): Antonio Joaquín Afán de Ribera (Q5698710): Spanish playwright, journalist and poet (1834-1906). Epìdosis 11:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I've filed a report. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Another one: Holger Mildh (Q5987052): Swedish writer (1915-1999). Epìdosis 17:18, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I've filed a report. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Another one: Piet Jongeling (Q4383497): Dutch politician, journalist and children's writer (1909–1985); the first should be Person, not Pseudonym. Epìdosis 18:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks for the hint. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Again: Jill MacLean (Q6192920): Canadian writer, one should be Pseudonym. Epìdosis 17:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I reported all three pseudonyms. --Kolja21 (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Another one: Hans Vorst (Q114400668): writer, Hans Belius is a Pseudonym. Epìdosis 13:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Epìdosis: I would keep them separate unless we have a proof. Till now it's just a guess ("vermutliches Pseudonym"). --Kolja21 (talk) 07:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I've add an other source and filed a report. --Kolja21 (talk) 07:29, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
And another one: Raphaël Meltz (Q3419484): French writer and editor, the second should be Pseudonym. Epìdosis 08:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Changed to "Pseudonym" and reported. --Kolja21 (talk) 08:14, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Gris

edit

Could you check if both GNDs in Gris (Q120754353) are pertinent? Thanks! --Epìdosis 08:27, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done I've add the real name and filed a report. --Kolja21 (talk) Kolja21 (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Juan Narbona

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/1341649458 Journalist, not Journalistin. Thanks! --Epìdosis 16:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Grazie per il suggerimento. --Kolja21 (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Luigi Lordi

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/1278727426 has an impossible fl. in 1888, but the only connected publication is https://swb.boss.bsz-bw.de/Record/(DE-627)1831663112?sid=28659953 - so he is Luigi Lordi (Q107003645): Italian jurist (1888-1945) as https://d-nb.info/gnd/1278727426 IMHO; the homonym Luigi Lordi (Q107003650): Italian mathematician (1897-1969) is attested in https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/DB=2.299//PPNSET?PPN=499645464&PRS=HOL&INDEXSET=21&COOKIE=Us998,Pbszgast,I2017,B20728,SY,NRecherche-DB,D2.299,E07cd79c3-0,A,H,R188.217.55.27,FY. Could you verify and create the missing one? Thanks, --Epìdosis 08:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

It is a clear misinterpretation of LC, which (correctly) cites 1888 as birthdate, not floruit (https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no89019869.html). Epìdosis 08:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks. Corrected, otherwise the GNDs would probably not have been merged. --Kolja21 (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Georg Buchner

edit

Hi! I need help with some bibliographic records that I don't know how to attribute in SBN:

Thanks as always! --Epìdosis 08:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I will look at it. There is a problem with User:Frettiebot. Your edit Georg Buchner (Q19953588): German painter and illustrator (1858-1914):
  • NKČR-AUT-Kennung (P691): hka2017955167, Moving claim to Georg Büchner (Q94789254)
  • Two hours later the bot add the wrong ID again: Czech-Authorities-Sync.
VIAF seems to be ok. @Frettie: FYI. --Kolja21 (talk) 13:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
PS: @Epìdosis: Please delete Q94789254. This item was created for a Georg Büchner, most probably Georg Büchner (Q154014): German dramatist and writer of poetry and prose (1813–1837), and mixed three persons. I've created a new item for the chemist Georg Buchner (1858-1944), once Q94817358. Q94817358 was merged with the conflated item and should also be deleted. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, @Kolja21 @Epìdosis I see! There is mistake in source in NKP record. So, which Georg on Wikidata is correct Georg for NKP Georg? Frettie (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Frettie: Georg Buchner (Q134236582)NL CR AUT ID (P691)hka2017955167 is the correct one; Q94789254 deleted. Thanks! Epìdosis 14:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Epìdosis Thanks, sent to NK ČR. --Frettie (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Frettie: Also ISNI 0000 0000 7858 1723 is about the painter, not the chemist. --Kolja21 (talk) 16:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
It will be ok where there is not QID in NK CR record. Frettie (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Epìdosis and @Kolja21 – it was corrected in NK ČR few moments ago. Petra checked whole record and fixed ISNI too. --Frettie (talk) 06:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

bibliographic records

edit

About the three works. I start with the first:

by Dr. Georg Buchner (München), see https://www.zobodat.at/publikation_articles.php?id=538544
Jahresbericht über das Maximilians-Gymnasium in München

The library catalogs yield different results:

  1.   OK hbz/obv: Georg Buchner (Q95257632): German teacher (1864-), most likely, as working in Munich
  2. LibraryThing: Georg Buchner (1862- ), Oberstudienrat in Munich; presumably identical to no. 1
  3. Staatsbibliothek Bamberg: Georg Buchner (Q134236582): chemist, unlikely

Imho you are save with no. 1. @Emu: What is your opinion? --Kolja21 (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Georg Buchner (Q95257632) seems to be a good match. He, at least, worked at the Maximilians-Gymnasium in Munich (https://dfg-viewer.de/show?tx_dlf%5Bid%5D=https://www.gda.bayern.de/mets/41705e98-e2ee-41e3-9c55-643d916361c3, see also https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/Q3E3JLHQIAVEYEJJIXEF6FVVSYGHQYGZ), and had a background in languages/philology. SimonEUV (talk) 03:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Danke für den Nachweis. Ich habe der DNB den Titel zum Umverknüpfen gemeldet. --Kolja21 (talk) 05:51, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@SimonEUV: In der Akte BayHStA, MK 16048 steht auf Bl. 99, dass Georg Buchner 1889 in Erlangen promoviert wurde. Dazu passt:
  • Die Historia septem Sapientum nach der Innsbrucker Handschrift v. J. 1342 (Erlangen, Univ., Diss., 1889)
  • Titelblatt: Georg Buchner aus Salzburg
Kannst du dir darauf einen Reim machen? Was verbindet den gebürtigen Münchner mit Salzburg? --Kolja21 (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Laut p. 4 dürfte er sein Jugend- bzw. Schulzeit in Salzburg verbracht haben. Da gäbe es also zumindest eine Verbindung. SimonEUV (talk) 06:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sein Vater war königlich bayrischer Oberstationsmeister und Salzburg Hbf ist Grenzbahnhof, das ist also eine sehr plausible Migrationsgeschichte. --Emu (talk) 08:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done https://opac.sbn.it/bid/LO12082885 and its authority record fixed in SBN. Epìdosis 10:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

bibliographic record no. 2

https://opac.sbn.it/bid/LO11129099: Franzosisches vokabularium auf etymologischer Grundlage mit einem anhange fur mittelsculen und zum privatgebrauch / von Anton Rauschmaier ; dritte durchgesehene und vermehrte auslage.

--Kolja21 (talk) 06:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done https://opac.sbn.it/bid/LO11129099 and its authority record fixed in SBN. Epìdosis 10:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

bibliographic record no. 3

https://opac.sbn.it/bid/UBO0311123: Zur Theorie der obligatorischen Haftpflichrversicherungen.

--Kolja21 (talk) 07:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done https://opac.sbn.it/bid/UBO0311123 and its authority record (now created) fixed in SBN. Epìdosis 10:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Johann von Csatò

edit

Vermutlich handelt es sich bei GND 117665673: "Csatò, Johann von" um den Botaniker János Csató (Q20478891). Der Datensatz ist eher mager, aber eventuell lässt sich anhand der verknüpften Daten die Übereinstimmung bestätigen. Danke! SimonEUV (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Die GND wurde 1997 vom Kallipe-Verbund angelegt, ist aber offenbar dort nicht mehr in Verwendung. Die Siebenbürgische Bibliothek verwendet die GND für den Autor von „Dr. Eduard Albert Bielz. Ein Nachruf“ (Nachweis). --Emu (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Danke! Damit ist wohl anzunehmen, dass es sich um dieselbe Person handelt. Wäre super wenn jemand mit entsprechender Berechtigung den GND-Eintrag noch ergänzen könnte. SimonEUV (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Danke für den Tipp und die Recherche. Eine Karteileiche des Kallipe-Verbunds weniger. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Arthur von Mayer

edit

Could you check the two GNDs here Arthur von Mayer (Q131838779): no description? Thanks, --Epìdosis 17:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Same person. Author of:
  • Die Brennpunkte der Eisenbahnfrage und deren sachgemäße Lösung (1891)
  • Geschichte und Geographie der deutschen Eisenbahnen von 1835 bis 1890 (1891)
@Iccander: 0 Fundstellen, aber du behauptest, nicht nur die Lebensdaten des Autors zu kennen, sondern weißt angeblich auch, dass der Mann katholisch war. Woher? --Kolja21 (talk) 20:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sorry! Sterbeurkunde als Quelle in Arthur von Mayer (Q131838779) ergänzt.
By the way: Wie gibt man die Urkundennummer in Wikidata am besten an? series ordinal (P1545) wird angemeckert: "Die Eigenschaft Ordnungsnummer sollte nicht an diesem Ort verwendet werden (als Fundstelle). Der einzig gültige Ort für diese Eigenschaft ist als Qualifikator." --Iccander (talk) 08:32, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Iccander Es bietet sich section, verse, paragraph, or clause (P958) an. --Emu (talk) 08:43, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Vielleicht eher catalog code (P528) oder inventory number (P217). --Kolja21 (talk) 08:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Passen beide nicht ganz – inventory number (P217) wird in diesem Zusammenhang eher für das Ganzstück, also z. B. den Band des Geburtenbuches verwendet, catalog code (P528) wird mit catalog (P972) verwendet. section, verse, paragraph, or clause (P958) entspricht noch am ehesten einer Randziffer, es entstand aus einer Generalisierung von Paragraphenbezeichnungen in Gesetzen. --Emu (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Dank an User:Rosenzweig, der beispielhaft bei Arthur von Mayer (Q131838779) einen Sterberegistereintrag formuliert hat, und zwar mit: type of reference (P3865), operating area (P2541), registration district (P5564), publication date (P577) und section, verse, paragraph, or clause (P958). Allerdings überzeugt die Verwendung von section, verse, paragraph, or clause (P958) für die Urkundennummer nicht ganz, zumal noch in der Form "Nr. 648". Es sind ja keine Randnummern o. dgl. zum Auffinden einer Aussage oder Textstelle, wie z.B. in Kirchenbüchern, sondern jede Seite im Sterbebuch/Sterberegister entspricht einer Urkunde/einem Dokument, fortlaufend numeriert je Jahr. Bsp: File:1916-03-16 Sterbeurkunde Wilhelm Barten.jpg. Gezielteres Durchforsten infrage kommender Eigenschaften förderte nun die Property record number (P9994) zu Tage, die laut Wikidata:Property proposal/record number vor dreieinhalb Jahren ausdrücklich zur Referenzierung einzelner Personenstandsurkunden geschaffen wurde, bislang nur noch keine deutsche Übersetzung hatte. Kombiniert werden müsste die Registernummer mit dem zugehörigen volume (P478). Bilder der Urkunde können mit reference image (P10253) in die Fundstelle eingebunden werden, so wie im Bsp. Johann Jacob Vorlaender (Q100700734) geschehen. --Iccander (talk) 08:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ich bin eigentlich nur durch den Link auf Q116055392 dazu gekommen :-) Letztlich verwende ich Eigenschaften, die bei Help:Sources/de#Archivsammlungen,_insbesondere_Lebensdaten aufgelistet sind (mit Dank an Emu für den Hinweis). Wenn es sich anbietet und sinnvoll ist, auch in Kombination mit anderen wie bei Arno Grimm (Q130407921). Registernummer hat es noch nicht auf diese Hilfeseite geschafft, kann ich aber gerne in Zukunft verwenden, wenn man sich darauf als sinnvoll einigt. Ich halte es für sinnvoll, auch das Datum des Eintrags festzuhalten, und nehme dafür hilfsweise publication date (P577) (gibt es eine passendere Eigenschaft dafür?) und für Nachträge im Personenstandsbuch (wie auch im Fall Mayer) last update (P5017). Band/Jahrgang ergibt sich dann aus dem Datum, weshalb ich den i.d.R. nicht aufführe. Falls der als notwendig erachtet wird, kann ich den aber in Zukunft auch aufführen. Eine Einzelseite aus einem Sterbebuch ist übrigens keine de:Sterbeurkunde, denn eine solche wird bei Bedarf separat erstellt aufgrund der Angaben aus dem Sterbebuch und wird dann auch explizit per Überschrift als solche bezeichnet. --Rosenzweig (talk) 10:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Letzterem kann ich mich nicht anschließen. Die Registereintragung ist die eigentliche, originale Urkunde, vgl. § 1 des (Reichs-)Gesetzes über die Beurkundung des Personenstandes und die Eheschließung vom 6. Februar 1875: Die Beurkundung der Geburten, Heirathen und Sterbefälle erfolgt ausschließlich durch die vom Staate bestellten Standesbeamten mittels Eintragung in die dazu bestimmten Register. Was Du als Sterbeurkunde ansprichst und was auch so betitelt wurde, ist laut § 15 dagegen nur ein beglaubigter Registerauszug, dem allerdings dieselbe Beweiskraft wie der Eintragung im Haupt- und Nebenregister beigemessen wurde. --Iccander (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Die Registereinträge sind sicher auch Urkunden. Dennoch sollte man m. E. der Praxis folgen, die eben nur besagte Auszüge per Überschrift als Sterbeurkunde bezeichnet (das steht über den Einträgen nicht drüber). Schon um Begriffsverwirrungen zu vermeiden. --Rosenzweig (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
record number (P9994) ist an mir ehrlich gesagt spurlos vorübergegangen, danke für den Hinweis. Bei nicht einmal 1000 Verwendungen scheint es nicht nur mir so zu gehen – sollte jedenfalls auch bei Help:Sources angegeben werden. --Emu (talk) 13:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hab's ja auch nur bei gezielter Suche ausfindig gemacht, weil es sowas geben musste! Engl. Help:Sources hab ich ergänzt, mit Übersetzung hab ich keine Ahnung. --Iccander (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
record number (P9994), anfangs nur als "record number" bekannt, müsste man mit den älteren Eigenschaften abgleichen. catalog code (P528) wird beispielsweise seit Jahren als Matrikel- und Listennummer (enrollment number) genutzt, ist aber nicht unter Help:Sources aufgeführt. --Kolja21 (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wilhelm Schapp

edit

Given https://www.grabsteine-ostfriesland.de/grabstein/2457/Wilhelm-Schapp--Aurich-Stadt I think https://d-nb.info/gnd/118606476 = Wilhelm Schapp (Q104242): German philosopher and jurist (1884-1965) should have 1965 as preferred date of death instead of 1969. Do you agree? --Epìdosis 16:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

FYI @Thomas Kerboul (BGE): for https://www.idref.fr/02834510X. Epìdosis 16:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I can't change information with parentheses using the web form (GND-Webformular). BTW: "Lebensdaten: 1884-1969 (Sterbejahr nach Enz. Wisstheorie: 1965)" isn't considered an error by the DNB. They only collect the data based on a priority list. (Maybe - but I haven't checked - Kürschner-Gelehrte has a higher priority than Enz. Wisstheorie.) --Kolja21 (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Epìdosis: fixed IdRef ; WBIS also have 1965, supposedly from both Kürschners Deutscher Gelehrten-Kalender (Q1797292) and Biographisches Lexikon für Ostfriesland (Q35747884). --Thomas Kerboul (BGE) (talk) 06:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Eric Zimmerman

edit

I moved https://d-nb.info/gnd/137215274 to Eric Zimmerman (Q134302668): lawyer (1967-) from Eric Zimmerman (Q5387816): American game designer, CEO of Gamelab because of the birthdate 1967, but all the connected bibliographic records in fact refer to Eric Zimmerman (Q5387816): American game designer, CEO of Gamelab. How should this be handled? Thanks, --Epìdosis 15:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

GND 137215274 was created by the Siegen University Library (Q1561991) (DE-467). It's a valid and correct identifier so there is nothing we can do even (like in this case) when it was created for a publication of an other person. --Kolja21 (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Adolf Schmiedl

edit

Could you check the pertinence of the GND https://d-nb.info/gnd/126792437 to Abraham Schmiedl (Q6041098): no description? I'm not completely sure. FYI @Emu:. Thanks, --Epìdosis 16:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it’s him. The GND was created for this book published by the Verein zur Bekleidung u. Unterstützg armer alter Männer israel. Konfession. His authorship is mentioned on page 131. Schmiedl was a honorary member of said organization. --Emu (talk) 19:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Emu:, reported! Epìdosis 20:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Alessandro Costa

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/116689013 = Alessandro Costa (Q63293363): Italian composer and philosopher (1857-1943) died in 1943, not 1953; presently no source in it. Thanks, --Epìdosis 19:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Geagea: https://www.nli.org.il/en/authorities/987007294255405171 remove wrong dates and Alessandro Costa (Q63293363): Italian composer and philosopher (1857-1943); I created Alessandro Costa (Q125244424): Italian architect for it. Epìdosis 19:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I've corrected the year of death for the composer. Q125244424 seem to be created by Arch2bot as a conflation:
  • archINFORM 11003: intervista di Nazzareno Centini e Alessandro Costa = Alessandro Costa (b. 1969), architect
  • ULAN 500080429 = Costa, Alessandro (Italian clergyman, 1555-1624)
@Arch2all: FYI. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
PS: ULAN has already been removed by Epìdosis (still mixed by archINFORM and VIAF). I've created Alessandro Costa (Q134310962): Italian clergyman (1555-1624). Presumably active in en:San Fedele, Albenga. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
archINFORM entry is now updated. Arch2all (talk) 07:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Reported. Geagea (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Marina Bianchi

edit

Marina Bianchi (Q116235759): Italian economist (1947-) has https://d-nb.info/gnd/170463974 (ok) and https://d-nb.info/gnd/127058206 (unclear); this second one has both works by Marina Bianchi (Q116235759): Italian economist (1947-) (e.g. https://d-nb.info/1127235885) and works by Marina Bianchi (Q116251135): Italian sociologist (1947-) (e.g. https://gateway-bayern.de/BV003316864). Thanks! --Epìdosis 20:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done GND 127058206 (created by DNB) = author of La teoria del valore dai classici a Marx (1970). Duplicate reported and missing GNDs created. --Kolja21 (talk) 00:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Heinrich Dehio

edit

Could you also check the two GND IDs here in Heinrich Dehio (Q11708759): German psychiatrist? Thanks! --Epìdosis 21:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

That the psychiatrist has taken part in the book Acht Generationen der Familie Dehio is likely but unconfirmed. (One have to see the original text. I noted the title. There is a copy at the Stabi Berlin.) --Kolja21 (talk) 01:09, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wilfried Jochens

edit

Could you help me unentangling the two singers in Wilfried Jochens (Q17523858): German singer and voice teacher (1946-)? SBN has only one, obviously empty, authority record (https://opac.sbn.it/bid/MODV281933) with 109 entities connected and I would need a criterium to establish how I can understand what was done by each of them. Thanks! --Epìdosis 09:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Doing… There seems to be a confusion between Jochens and Jochims, see Wilfried Jochims (Q129685641): German singer (tenor), singing teacher and principal. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Jean-Louis Peverelli

edit

Jean-Louis Peverelli (Q95896877): actor (fl. 2008) I'm not fully sure of what I did here in 2020 about GND IDs. Could you check? Thanks! --Epìdosis 22:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Since there is no proof that the two perons are identical, I created Jean-Louis Peverelli (Q134392039): Swiss journalist and writer (1933-2017). --Kolja21 (talk) 23:31, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hartmut von Kirchberg-Balzheim

edit

Hartmut von Kirchberg-Balzheim (Q95828077): no description isn't it a bit strange that they are interlinked with "Vater des gleichnamigen Sohns" vs "Sohn des gleichnamigen Vaters", with the same living period "ca. Ende 12., Anfang 13. Jh."? Shouldn't the son be slightly later in comparison with the father? Thanks, --Epìdosis 22:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sure that would be helpful. Nevertheless they are father and son = 2 persons. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Type pseudonym - ter

edit

Adolf Theodor Hahn (Q23942735): Baltic German merchant and local politician (1832-1914) a bit strange. --Epìdosis 22:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Looks like a wrong merge: Adolf Theodor Hahn vs. Adolf Friedrich Hahn. Sources:
That could be three different persons. --Kolja21 (talk) 00:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC) / Continued, see Talk:Q23942735.Reply
  Done Duplicate. --Kolja21 (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Harriet Eliza Paine (Q98582287): American writer (1845-1910) the two GND IDs are correctly related but the first should be Pseudonym not Person. Epìdosis 21:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks for the hint. --Kolja21 (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Armand Tallier (Q30332141): French actor (1887-1958) the first should be Pseudonym. Epìdosis 17:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done --Kolja21 (talk) 22:50, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Pamela Berger

edit

Pamela Berger (Q88383454): American art historian and filmmaker the second GND has a wrong birthdate, right? --Epìdosis 08:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Seems like it. She both joined the Boston College Fine Arts Department and published her opus magnum in 1974 so that’s probably the reason why GND and NKČR (the latter now being fixed) committed this error. --Emu (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Indeed. GND fixed and duplicate reported. --Kolja21 (talk) 13:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Andreas Berger

edit

Andreas Berger (Q131830663): no description are the two GND IDs both right? Thanks! --Epìdosis 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

No, this item was created for the German actor Andreas Berger (Q131468340): no description. I'll fix it. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done Bizarre. GND 1227795440 is for the German actor (b. 1993). The GND had no year of birth but Q131830663 stated b. 1959 with the source GND 1227795440. @SgsNox, Beat Estermann: I've created Andreas Berger (Q134398242): German-Swiss actor and director for the namesake. --Kolja21 (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
PS: Swisscovery kennt noch einen Andreas Berger (7 Titel), der als GND 1089418337 "Filmschaffender" ohne weitere Angaben erfasst ist. Vermutlich ist er mit Andreas Berger (b. 1959) identisch. --Kolja21 (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Peter Theek

edit

Peter Theek (Q131745079): no description the death date of the first GND seems wrong. Thanks! --Epìdosis 20:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Corrected (error in the source: DBA) and duplicate reported. --Kolja21 (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

John Kemp

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/118957007 just removed from John Kemp (Q98959820): British philosopher (1920-); the bibliographic records in DNB are wrongly attributed, unless I'm wrong and the philosopher was also a pilot in WWII (chronologically possible) - in that case, this GND is a duplicate. Thanks, --Epìdosis 21:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Complicated. Looking at The living thoughts of Schopenhauer (DNB 578147564):
  • There is no hint that the translator J. Kemp is identical with the pilot in WWII.
  • I've created John Kemp (Q134399650): no description.
But I also doubt that he is identical with the philosopher (b. 1920).
  1. The living thoughts of Schopenhauer was first published in 1939.
  2. cf. the translation of The World as Will and Idea (Sixth ed.), 1906.
Kolja21 (talk) 23:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I've created John Kemp (Q134439796): no description (= GND 1365286037) and reported the wrong linked titles. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robert Prévost

edit

So, regarding the new pope: Dieu n'échoue pas (appearing 4 times in https://swb.boss.bsz-bw.de/search/results?lookfor0[]=gnd_from:1284904598&bool0[]=OR&lookfor0[]=gnd_about:1284904598) is instead by Robert Prévost (Q110226082): French priest (1895-1980), needing soon a GND ;-) Thanks! --Epìdosis 07:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done I agree. GND 1365061027 created. --Kolja21 (talk) 08:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Filmarchiv des DIF ➔ Filmarchiv des DFF

edit

Das Filmarchiv des DIF heißt seit dem Namenswechsel des Trägers 2019 German film archive (Q1205625). Könntest Du das in der GND mit einem neuen Eintrag als Nachfolger abbilden? Habe den genauen Verlauf in de:Filmarchiv des DFF dargestellt. --Printstream (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Danke für den Hinweis, aber da mische ich mich nicht ein (Vorgänger, Nachfolger + administrativ übergeordnet). Das ist eine Aufgabe für die festangestellten Bibliothekare. --Kolja21 (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hintergrund: Ich habe nur über das GND-Webformular Zugriff auf die Datenbank, d.h. ich kann zwar eine GND anlegen, aber nicht die ganzen Verästelungen darstellen. --Kolja21 (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Achso, alles klar, danke! --Printstream (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

August Sander

edit

I have some uncertainty on the two GND IDs in August Sander (Q21543678): German classical philologist and teacher; could you check? Thanks! --Epìdosis 22:42, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Q21543678 was created for Sander, August Ludwig (Wilhelm?):
But why "Wirkungsdaten: 1809-1849"? GND 116780681 (Kalliope) should be an other person (b. 1817) but is used amongst others for a letter Hildesheim, 04.08.1820. I would keep GND 116780681 separate until we find more information. --Kolja21 (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I've checked three sources:
I guess GND 116780681 is a mix of two persons. --Kolja21 (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I filed a report. The BSB may be able to find out which sources were used. --Kolja21 (talk) 12:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Christian Guillet

edit

In Christian Guillet (Q22211352): French writer the second GND - https://d-nb.info/gnd/116922109 - is unclear, it has a fl. 1861 which seems not coherent with the connected publications. Thanks, --Epìdosis 15:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Typo fixed (fl. 1961) and duplicate reported. BTW: B3Kat mixes with Christian Guillet (Q120468856): essayist. Now GND 1365233073. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:11, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rémi Lange

edit

https://swbwww.bsz-bw.de/images/img_psi/2.0/icons/zitierlink.gif is obviously by Rémi Lange (Q3456046): French film director not Rémi Langevin (Q26250931): French mathematician. Thanks! --Epìdosis 16:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done You meant the film Tarik el Hob (DVD 2004). I've created GND 1365270017 and wrote to the library. --Kolja21 (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
BTW https://d-nb.info/gnd/1057156132 in Rémi Langevin (Q26250931): French mathematician is probably wrong in saying he is a linguist; I reported it for a merge. Epìdosis 16:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
GND created for Negação em uma língua de sinais brasileira (1994) = The sublexical structure of a sign language. I've corrected the occupation. Otherwise DNB might not merge. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

David Storch

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/11984091X the two bibliographic records in DNB are wrong. Thanks, --Epìdosis 16:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Indeed. The bibliographic records belong to David Storch (Q28028645): Czech mammalogist. --Kolja21 (talk) 15:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ulrich Christoph Gradmann

edit

Ulrich Christoph Gradmann (Q29342675): German merchant and diarist could you also check the two GND IDs here? Most probably correct IMHO. Thanks, --Epìdosis 17:06, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Checked and reported. --Kolja21 (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thomas Rex

edit

A few doubts also on the two GND IDs in Thomas Rex (Q51879217): no description, could you have a look? Thanks! --Epìdosis 07:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Checked and reported. --Kolja21 (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Christoph Krauß

edit

Christoph Krauss (Q129835261): automotive security researcher the connected works in DNB are very similar, but one is "Dr.-Ing." and the other "Dr. rer. nat." --Epìdosis 08:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Confusing:
@1Veertje: Can you take a look? --Kolja21 (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
"Time-dependent recommender systems ..." by M.Sc. Christopher Krauß geb. in Berlin.
He is the one connected to the Fraunhofer-Institut. GND 1313632155 Christoph Krauß with the source www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/christopherkrauss is contradictory.
--Kolja21 (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Doing… I've filed a report and will check after the feedback again. --Kolja21 (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ferdinand Beyer

edit

From the publications in DNB, https://d-nb.info/gnd/116159162 would seem Ferdinand Beyer (Q66223): German composer and pianist (1806-1863), but fl. 1913 is strange. Could you check? Thanks, --Epìdosis 08:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done I've created Ferdinand Beyer (Q134449300): no description and reported the wrong linked titles. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Karl Kapeller

edit

Karl Kapeller (Q125283666): Austrian composer in the second GND the death date has been mistaken as birth date. Could you fix before reporting? Thanks! --Epìdosis 22:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Doing… You're probably right but I don't know the source (Altmann) and there is also a namesake Karl Kapeller (Q55676822): Austrian composer. So I've filed a report and will check after the feedback again. --Kolja21 (talk) 13:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Emu: Could it be that the two composers are identical? --Kolja21 (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the OeML changed the life dates (2005 version, 2021 version). I’m currently   Working on the Wikidata item and a de.wp article. --Emu (talk) 15:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done w:de:Karl Kapeller (Kapellmeister). A rather curious case given that he is a B-tier Wienerlied composer. --Emu (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Heinrich Zumpft

edit

Heinrich Zumpft (Q124994848): (1799-1878) a few doubts on the second GND because it has only fl. 1829. Thanks! --Epìdosis 22:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done He worked together with Carl Osterwald (Q125542782): (1793–1868). Duplicate reported. --Kolja21 (talk) Kolja21 (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Georg Falke

edit

Georg Falke (Q124362922): no description Both GND IDs are theologians, but I'm not fully sure about the identity, the second has no birthdate. Thanks! --Epìdosis 22:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Doing… Sono in vacanza da domani. --Kolja21 (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wilhelm Herding

edit

I have just moved https://d-nb.info/gnd/125129572 to Wilhelm Herding (Q21545892): latinist, but (I see through Prometheus) it still has many connected works of https://d-nb.info/gnd/1157853277 = Wilhelm Herding (Q21545892): latinist; could the situation be improved? Thanks, --Epìdosis 22:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Baltzer

edit

I'm not fully sure Johann Peter Baltzer (Q55681014): no description had as names both Johann Peter and Johann Baptist. Thanks, --Epìdosis 08:24, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Andreas Zahn

edit

The two GND IDs in Andreas Zahn (Q122764183): German zoologist (1964-) seem to be different persons (biologist vs meteorologist), but I'm not fully certain. Thanks! --Epìdosis 09:29, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

From what I can see, GND:1117091252 unambiguously refers to Andreas Zahn (Q122764183): German zoologist (1964-). The situation for GND:1020218134 is, in contrast, way less clear. The mentioned source (Anliegen Natur 44, 1 (2022), Seite 82) refers to Andreas Zahn (Q122764183). Also the data in "Lebensdaten" (1964-), "Beziehungen zu Organisationen", and "Akademischer Grad" (Dr.) fit. However, the other data in "Beruf(e)" (Meteorologe), "Weitere Angaben", and "Thematischer Bezug" most likely refer to Andreas Zahn (Q89107839): researcher (cf. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andreas-Zahn-2). The publications linked to GND:1020218134 relate most likely also to the latter. Seems i missed this clear conflation in the first place.... SimonEUV (talk) 19:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Doing… I'm on vacation, but I'll look into it later. Kolja21 (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Jacob Hegetschweiler

edit

Johann Jacob Hegetschweiler (Q55851594): no description here the first GND is plausible, but I'm not fully sure. Thanks, --Epìdosis 09:19, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Franz Oehme

edit

I think the two GND IDs are most probably about the same person in Franz Oehme (Q117771720): no description, but a final check would be useful. Thanks! --Epìdosis 13:51, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

W. E. S. Holland

edit

https://d-nb.info/gnd/1146900279 = William Edward Sladen Holland (Q113728514): no description has a wrong birthdate that probably should be corrected before reporting the duplication. Thanks! --Epìdosis 14:06, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Pierre La Rouge

edit

Pierre Le Rouge (Q120356453): no description is a printer; he has https://d-nb.info/gnd/1075199778 (Person) + https://d-nb.info/gnd/1072886030 (Organisation); is this correct according to GND standards? Thanks, --Epìdosis 14:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Elias Fink

edit

Elias Fink (Q113820914): no description the first two GND IDs are OK, but I have doubts on the third one. Could you check? Thanks! --Epìdosis 09:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ernst Rosenbusch

edit

Some doubts about the two GND IDs here Ernst Rosenbusch (Q77577267): no description. Thanks! --Epìdosis 20:33, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Franco Mezzena

edit

https://gateway-bayern.de/BV046522879 misuses https://d-nb.info/gnd/173832342 = Franco Mezzena (Q1163885): Italian violinist and conductor (1953-), the work is clearly by Franco Mezzena (Q130308257): Italian archaeologist (1940-2024). Thanks! --Epìdosis 07:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

D. Koller

edit

Dieter Koller (Q112472671): no description I think Dieter and Dietrich can be different form of the same name, both used for the same person, but I write you for a confirmation; the occupations are coherent as well as the dates. Thanks, --Epìdosis 08:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Elisabeth Albrecht

edit

Elisabeth Albrecht (Q94777340): no description the two GND IDs are probable but I'm not fully sure. Thanks! --Epìdosis 20:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Constantin Suyskens

edit

Constantinus Suyskenus (Q1127938): Belgian hagiographer and church historian already reported as a duplication in GND, but I think correcting the fl. 1852 in https://d-nb.info/gnd/12097990X could be anyway worthwhile. Thanks! --Epìdosis 17:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Alice Moustier

edit

I'm uncertain on Alice Moustier (Q134481400): no description: the two GND IDs are really about the same person? Thanks, --Epìdosis 17:05, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Emil Neuburger

edit

Emil Neubürger (Q94871252): no description I'm uncertain here, the second GND seems based on Kalliope and specifically two letters to Oskar Eberhard ... same person? --Epìdosis 20:32, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Paul Krause

edit

Paul Krause (Q94898668): no description: https://mbl.ub.ovgu.de/Biografien/0341.htm says that Die Stadt Oppenheim unter der Verwaltung des Reiches (attributed presently to the second GND) is by the first GND, but the birthdate 1891 and the "Diss. Univ. Breslau, 1915" of the second GND are either a mistake or it means that the second GND is effectively distinct from the first one. Could you check them? Thanks! --Epìdosis 21:52, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Claudia Campos

edit

Hallo Kolja, Claudia Campos (Q83500587): biochemist is wahrscheinlich nicht dieselbe als Claudia Campos Rozo (Q134548292): biologist ; GND 1056610638 trägt den Namen der letzteren, aber die Veröffentlichungen der ersteren. Danke! --Thomas Kerboul (BGE) (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Doing… Die Vermischung geht vermutlich auf eine fehlerhafte Einspielung von ORCID zurück. Ich bin gerade im Urlaub und kümmere mich darum, wenn ich zurück bin. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Kurt Fischer

edit

Könntest du für Kurt Fischer (Q1573318) eine GND erstellen, um diese Vermischung mit Kurt Fischer (Q134548437) aufzuheben? Letzterer hat angesichts der Zeit der Veröffentlichungen wahrscheinlich auch das falsche Geburtsjahr vom ersteren erhalten? --Printstream (talk) 12:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Doing… Danke für den Hinweis. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
PS: GND 135828899 wurde für die Diss. Zur Psychologie des Papierschneidens sech- bis siebenjähriger Kinder (1953) angelegt = Kurt Fischer (Q134549640): no description. Hast du das biographisches Handbuch Abgeordnete in Niedersachsen 1946-1994? Eine GND nur auf Grundlage eines Wikipedia-Eintrags anzulegen, mache ich ungern, da sonst mögliche Fehler fortgeschrieben werden. --Kolja21 (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Leider nicht, vielleicht hat @Ticketautomat das Buch noch und könnte den Inhalt wiedergeben (S. 99)? (via de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Politiker/Bücherei). Der Zweitname Richard gehört dann aber vermutlich auch nur zu Kurt Fischer (Q134549640): no description und nicht Kurt Fischer (Q134548437): no description, oder? --Printstream (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Stimmt. Ich habe den zweiten Vornamen entsprechend gestrichen. Der Numismatiker braucht natürlich auch noch eine GND. --Kolja21 (talk) 06:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply