Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ginmo
- Ginmo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
edit
- D1iior (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- Janegraphy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- مهیار مهرنیا (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) (globally banned for crosswiki abuse)
- Jaahanbakht (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) (globally banned for crosswiki abuse)
- Ialinikoo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
Rationale, discussion and results edit
Reason: Most of these are new accounts who'a only contributions were to the crosswiki spam item Q62067301. The fact that some of them already have been gllobally banned for crosswiki abuse only strengthens my suspicion. @Jasper Deng: @Sotiale: Trade (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Results:
Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Stale and in the case of account(Ialinikoo) that can compare data, I couldn't find any data that could be considered to have used different multiple accounts. --Sotiale (talk) 22:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Do you think there is sufficient behavioral evidence to block these accounts as sockpuppets?@Jasper Deng:--Trade (talk) 02:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Editing the same item is not alone sufficient grounds; the fact that Ialinikoo removed rather than added content rules them in particular out of being a sock, unless there's other evidence connecting them.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)