Wikidata

Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/LaraLili2005

< Wikidata:Requests for checkuser‎ | Case

LaraLili2005

edit
edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: The two first users have similar user names and have a history of creating hoaxes and cross wiki vandalism.

LaraLili2000 have been blocked on spanish WP for ban evasion and for being a sock puppet of MuffySeville56.

ScoobyMiller40 is his current sock which he uses to create hoax aeticles on various WP's. --Trade (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Declined @Trade: Only the first and last accounts exist on Wikidata and you need more evidence to warrant checking those two.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems fairly obvious to me that the first and second account was created by the same person. I got my information about the three first accounts by looking them up at Global account information. I was made aware of the fourth sock puppet by

@Ytha67:--Trade (talk) 23:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know if there was a request like this. As a conclusion, the users you presented are all the same users. Before I saw this request, I had handled a request from SRG because these users had abused on xwiki. All of these users except for LaraLili2005 were locked before viewing this request. But it seems that SRG on Meta was more appropriate than here. I think Jasper's decision is valid because this request wasn't enough explained for abuse on Wikidata(You should have presented LaraLili2005 and LolaMiller95!). In the case of problems with other wikis, the investigation will not proceed unless it is intended to prevent exploits on other wikis. Anyway, thank you for your report. If you find this friend next time, report it to SRG! :) --Sotiale (talk) 15:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"I think Jasper's decision is valid because this request wasn't enough explained for abuse on Wikidata(You should have presented LaraLili2005 and LolaMiller95!)."
"In the case of problems with other wikis, the investigation will not proceed unless it is intended to prevent exploits on other wikis" Could you eleborate on these two points? I also have no idea who LolaMiller95 is. --Trade (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This means that the information you provided was not sufficiently presented to proceed with the investigation. For example, two of the accounts you presented above have Wikidata accounts. But one of them has no contribution here. Although they are blocked on other wikis, it's important to review whether they did the same wrong on Wikidata. I mentioned LolaMiller95 because this user is the same user you presented, which means that if you presented this user, this user had contribution and could possibly have investigated.
If you were requesting an investigation with the intention of preventing exploitation of a wiki other than Wikidata, that could also be a reason to proceed. However, this is possible if there is abuse on another wiki and there is not enough information on that wiki.
I am grateful that you are active in the checkuser request area. Surprisingly, most of your requests are hit! I think you have a good sense of grasping their patterns. Handling your request is a pleasure, at least for me. However, please explain a little more in detail about what you felt. It helps us reasonably process your request. I hope you have enough answers. Please continue your good activity! --Sotiale (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, first thanks for the explanations, I have learned. The intention of my notice was to notify the contributions of a user with a clear intention of damaging the wikis. My short experience and my limitation with the language has not allowed me to make the appropriate requests. The four accounts LaraLili2005, LaraLili200, MuffySevilla56 and DaisyBus2017, plus the IPs that have been used followed a specific pattern, I detected it when verifying the data, and for his performances on other wikis. I hope I can learn more about the procedures, and on future occasions, if they arise, I will ask for help. Thanks for everything: @Trade, Trade:, @Sotiale: and checkuser. --Ytha67 (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DaisyBus2017 have already been globally blocked by Sotiale. @Ytha67:--Trade (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LaraLili2005&oldid=1200624824"