Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/OnavilStep

29 January 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Very similar modus operandi, creating UP with signature and then one item on a non-notable subject. Lymantria (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed

  •   Confirmed OnavilStep, StepomTeru, Humaiun kamal41, StepenDonri, KurtHelen, Costarina1, JesminArin, Nencel12, MichelLc2

  • This user used OpenVPN.

All blocked and tagged. @Lymantria: Could you clean up their spam items? Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 02:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Done and thanks again! Lymantria (talk) 08:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I blocked Jackdaylay (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) as well, passing the duck test. I don't think there is need to do CU now. Lymantria (talk) 17:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02 February 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Again this very similar modus operandi as above. Lymantria (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale: I found a couple more users with very similar user patterns. I guess because of the use of OpenVPN it will be difficult to close the tap of new users? If so, I might stop asking for certainty here, and deal with it differently. Lymantria (talk) 12:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed

  •   Confirmed BilliStepen, YazganJith, NeailPatell, MarkKely, MacholeJie, VanderKj0, Bozalegenda, Andy Rajesh, Stepenthomas, AngelMend1, GaziLee0, Topaelur12, Robertlee10, Alexlay0, HoridasBen, MarinerMcc

  • This user used OpenVPN and OPs.

All blocked and tagged. @Lymantria: We can block it right away because the pattern is clear, but it also has the advantage of finding hidden friends and blocking open proxies :D --Sotiale (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • All   Confirmed...
  • ... with JosepJay, Angelinajeli, Smethi124, Thomaes540

  • This user used VPN and OPs.

@Lymantria: You can block them that haven't been blocked yet! :D --Sotiale (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 February 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Recreation of earlier created item. The pattern is not the same anymore. The modus operandi to me appears as one of a spam bot. Lymantria (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed

  •   Confirmed Group 1: Tabroshi and SsenseThem
  •   Confirmed Group 2: StepenVelid, OpurliNaLo

  •   Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  •   Confirmed Group 2 and above OnavilStep cases

  • They used OPs or VPN.

@Lymantria:. --Sotiale (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Group 1 >> Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/SsenseThem. Lymantria (talk) 09:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 March 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Common interest in Jackson Yew just as Wynnberg earlier. Lymantria (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Confirmed OpurliNaLo, Travis Delieves and Spice Wing --Alaa :)..! 18:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@علاء: It seems to me that there is a mistake in typing, as Travis OpurliNaLo and Delieves are not registered users. OpurliNaLo indeed is in this case. Can you check, please? Lymantria (talk) 08:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lymantria, sorry, fixed --Alaa :)..! 14:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Similar subjects among the first two, edit behaviour of first user. Subject choice of the third user (same as earlier sock Travis Delieves. Lymantria (talk) 20:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+Jonathonley with the original edit pattern. Lymantria (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: --Lymantria (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed

  •   Confirmed Bifari Benjur, Zandia Eilia
  •   Likely Aroraankesh
  •   Unlikely Ashgotonit
  •   Stale Jonathonley

  • These accounts used VPN/OPs.

@Lymantria: Good evening. --Sotiale (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]