Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Polabott

Polabott

Polabott (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)

19 January 2021

Bilish123 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
Related IP address, if any (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · IP address, if any WHOIS · IP address, if any.html RBLs · IP address, if any proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log))

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: Recreating previously deleted item Shubhang Arora (Q99964954) --Trade (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: Declined Master is Stale, just ask for the deletion of item and warn user, if they do again, ask for block. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this be an situation to block and mark as a sock for similar edit behavior? --Trade (talk) 12:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trade, Yes, but this is a page for a request for checkuser. If an admin feel that should be done, they can. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think non-CU are supposed to mark and block users as socks. --Trade (talk) 22:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trade, Based on behavioural evidence they can mark them as a suspected sock. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please block them as socks based on behavioral evidence? @1997kB: --Trade (talk) 08:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC) I was always under the assumption that this was the place to report suspected socks, even if the master is stale. I could be wrong so it might make sense for you to ask the other CU's--Trade (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]