Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pyshistiu

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Similar patterns of vandalism. Please see AN Trade (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Inconclusive. I'm leaning slightly yes based on behavior but there's not much edits to begin with.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose we can still block them for the vandalism? Also i forgot to ping @Wolverène:Trade (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade:   Done. Meatpuppetry, particularly a coordinated attack, seems most likely.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like he's back. I have a hard time believing this to be a coincidence considering the timing.@Jasper Deng:--Trade (talk) 22:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Novikoff:--Trade (talk) 22:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about the pattern, but at least the username of Даун ебаный (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) (that I've already reported at AN) is so obscene that it leaves no place for AGF, this user should be indeffed anyway. — Mike Novikoff 23:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Novikoff: AGF? --Trade (talk) 23:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: WD:AGF @Mike Novikoff: The additional account is   Possible.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]