Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Royalsalanit

Royalsalanit edit

Stree tream (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
Tools: tream interaction-timeline · tream&sort=0 intersect-contribs
Later appointed to Royalsalanit (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) as sockmaster. Lymantria (talk) 09:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2021 edit

Princeksalani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Common interest in non-notable Prince Salani. Both accounts are suspected (but not checked) for sockpuppetry at enwiki. Sleepers? Lymantria (talk) 17:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: These are Confirmed to be the same along with Royalsalanit (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate), which, being older, should be considered the master from now on (the case should be moved).--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 October 2021 edit

Pkumars1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: This user has created a page about Prince Salani on wikiquote and making vandal edits here. -- Afeef (talk) 03:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: Pretty Likely; blocked and tagged.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 December 2021 edit

Pinsalani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Created item on Prince Salani. Lymantria (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: Technically I would only call it Possible since they are using a different ISP. But It looks like a duck to me based on their edits, so I have blocked the account.-BRP^ever 02:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]