Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Trần Thiên Hoàng Long

18 December 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: These accounts have been spamming "Thành Phố Thủ Đức, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam" into vi descriptions of various items. FYI, Thành Phố Thủ Đức (Q104050371) was an urban district of Ho Chi Minh City (Q1854), but recently VN govt. promoted it to subcity level. viwiki, among others, have then been facing with IPs and accounts attempting to add this very statements ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức"). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: The master and the first three accounts are   Confirmed with the rest highly   Likely to be also the same. All blocked; someone needs to tag.   No comment on the IP address.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Done All tagged. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:48, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 December 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Same editing pattern ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức") with confirmed socks above. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 09:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed

  •   Confirmed Cô bé bán diêm 0122222, Bảo Thắng Apluss and above accounts

Yes, I think it would be safe even if we consider them as the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 11:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Done All tagged, please block them for sockpuppetry. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

30 December 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Same editing pattern ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức"). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 09:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Confirmed; blocked and tagged.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3 January 2022 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Same editing pattern ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức"). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 03:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added another one, same evidence. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 01:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed

  •   Confirmed TP. Thủ Đức.01, Vịt Con Xấu Xí223, In the forest.012

--Sotiale (talk) 13:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Tagged. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 21:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2022 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Same editing pattern ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức"). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Not done

  It looks like a duck to me. Please request block directly from Wikidata:AN. --Sotiale (talk) 11:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In any case (since I wanted to find sleepers) they look   Unrelated to the master for me though they are   Likely the same on their own.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 February 2022 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Same editing pattern ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức"). CU is needed to find sleeper(s). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results: These two are   Confirmed to the master; I also found ThànhPhốThủĐức.1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) and Bảo Thắng Thiên (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate)   Confirmed to them. Blocked; someone else can do the tagging.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Tagged NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2022 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Same editing pattern ("Thành Phố Thủ Đức"). May need global lock for these due to persistent vandalism. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 07:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasper Deng: I am following up because I haven't seen any reply from an active checkuser for almost two weeks. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Inconclusive as to whether they are related to the original master because the old accounts are now   Stale and there are no strong IP matches to what I see in the CU log. With that said:

The following are   Confirmed to be the same:

The other accounts are   Possible; this will need evaluation based on behavioral evidence.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]