Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/EpiskoBot 2
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Not done @Looperz: This request seems to be abandoned, please reopen it if that is not the case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
EpiskoBot 2 edit
EpiskoBot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Looperz (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s:
- On my Own Diskussion-Page is was asked do replace subject has role (P2868) by object has role (P3831) concerning consecrator (P1598) of bishops/archbishops.
Code:
- I will provide that on github: https://github.com/re4jh/EpiskobotScripts
Function details:
- Check for consecrator (P1598) with subject has role (P2868) Qualifier, change that to a object has role (P3831) value will be kept.
--Looperz (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, please do that. I fixed it on Q450675---- Jura 03:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
- For the moment I am waiting for a decision, because this question affects about 34.000 Pages. With often not only one claim for consecrator (P1598). --Looperz (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think you should stop misusing the qualifier. You probably added some 8000 since the problem was mentioned to you. If you think your approach is correct, you might want to seek additional feedback on project chat. The bot approval is more technical in nature. Personally, I tend to oppose additional requests by users who are known not to cleanup their bot tasks. --- Jura 10:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your opinion, Jura. Where should I go an get other opinions? Since it is "just" one single opinion, this is no reason for a full edit stop or change. --Looperz (talk) 23:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- I know it's just your single opinion, but even so I don't think you bring much to support it either. Project chat is at Wikidata:Project chat. --- Jura 00:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Your proposal for using object has role (P3831) is just a single opinion, too. subject has role (P2868) is at least an auto suggested qualifier. The sentence "I tend to oppose additional requests by users who are known not to cleanup their bot tasks" is an accusation I have to contradict to. I offered a change even by mass edit as soon as I get a common decision for that subject-object confusion. --Looperz (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I noticed you ignored Ahoerstemeier's opinion and autosuggestion might just come from your bad edits. --- Jura 08:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Your proposal for using object has role (P3831) is just a single opinion, too. subject has role (P2868) is at least an auto suggested qualifier. The sentence "I tend to oppose additional requests by users who are known not to cleanup their bot tasks" is an accusation I have to contradict to. I offered a change even by mass edit as soon as I get a common decision for that subject-object confusion. --Looperz (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- I know it's just your single opinion, but even so I don't think you bring much to support it either. Project chat is at Wikidata:Project chat. --- Jura 00:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Meanwhile object has role (P3831) has the majority and i am really looking forward to a change of that autosuggestion thing :-) --Looperz (talk) 13:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)