Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfRollback/March 2024
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Contents
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
البربوشي
البربوشي (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
أحتاج لصلاحية للمساهمة بشكل أفضل علما أنني محرر ومسترجع في ويكيبيديا العربية البربوشي (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- But you still did not perform any reverting edits on Wikidata though normally the flag only granted to those who have an experience in fighting vandalism here. The experience on your homewiki is not relevant enough for us, but anyways -- could you at least show us several examples of your reverts in the Arabic Wikipedia which can be clearly considered as an elimination of disruptive edits? --Wolverène (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes of course, with pleasure you can look at my anti-vandal statistics at [1] On this page البربوشي (talk) 03:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverène Wait your reply البربوشي (talk) 03:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- لقد وضعت لك صفحة إحصائياتي على ويكيبيديا من موقع xtools في الرد السابق شاهدته ؟ البربوشي (talk) 09:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for not replying promptly, yes I saw it -- I just not able to work on requests all day long. I see that you have some experience in anti-vandalism activity, I could grant you the rollbacker flag later if there will be no objections. But still, why are you sure that you need this right exactly here if you possibly did not face disruptive activity on Wikidata (also judging by the XTools info)? --Wolverène (talk) 11:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- لقد وضعت لك صفحة إحصائياتي على ويكيبيديا من موقع xtools في الرد السابق شاهدته ؟ البربوشي (talk) 09:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverène Wait your reply البربوشي (talk) 03:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes of course, with pleasure you can look at my anti-vandal statistics at [1] On this page البربوشي (talk) 03:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverène@مرحبا
- حسنا يكفيني حاليا صلاحية Confirmed users
- اذا أمكنك منحي صلاحية وشطب طلبي للحصول على صلاحية مسترجع البربوشي (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
مرحبًا @البربوشي:، كما ذُكر في الرد أعلاه بأنَّ لديك صلاحية مؤكد تلقائي (autoconfirmed) وبالتالي لا حاجة لمنحك صلاحية مؤكد (confirmed)، فأنت فعليًا تمتلك هذه الصلاحية! --Alaa :)..! 20:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn --Alaa :)..! 20:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Nastoshka
Nastoshka (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Dear admins, I am active on several Wikimedia projects since 2014, previously a sysop on it.voy and global rollbacker. After a long break due to RL commitments I'm back since end 2023, active in SWMT, and currently a rollbacker on it.wikt and sv.voy and engaged in countervandalism also here on wikidata and it.voy. I'd like to request the rollbacker flag to help combating vandalism effectively and being able to use tools like speedpatrolling. Thanks in advance for consideration and cheers. Nastoshka (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the help with vandalism. Infrastruktur (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Infrastruktur (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC) |
מקף
מקף (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hi,
I am requesting a local Rollbacker flag to allow me to more easily monitor and cancel vandalism.
(Although there is a global flag, it should not be used in large projects, so I actually have to be limited to manual or gadget restorations.)
Thank you, · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 10:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done Ok. That's a very obvious yes. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC) |
KonstantinaG07
KonstantinaG07 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I am a former Wikidata admin and oversighter, I returned (renamed) after a long period of inactivity and would like to still contribute in counter-vandalism more effectively. KonstantinaG07 (talk) 18:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done, trusted user. –FlyingAce✈hello 18:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Lionel Cristiano
Lionel Cristiano (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hello, I know the rollback rules. I delete any incorrect or vandal changes and rewrite. This right will make my job easier. Thanks. Lionel Cristiano (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Very few reverts on wikidata yet, but I think your patrolling and approving of edits on turkish wikipedia makes up for it. Infrastruktur (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- You can be sure that I will use this very well :) Lionel Cristiano (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done As mentioned, there are not many reverts currently, but I trust that you will follow the guidelines for rollback. :) –FlyingAce✈hello 17:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :) Lionel Cristiano (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done As mentioned, there are not many reverts currently, but I trust that you will follow the guidelines for rollback. :) –FlyingAce✈hello 17:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- You can be sure that I will use this very well :) Lionel Cristiano (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- That username couldn't say football fan any louder. :-) Fun fact: There is actually quite a bit of vandalism that involves the names of the two football gods. Infrastruktur (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Philipnelson99
Philipnelson99 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I have been working in the countervandalism space on Wikidata for a little while now and would benefit from having the rollback permission. I also have done quite a bit of countervandalism work globally if that helps. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done Looks trusted and competent despite the low edit count, and has a use for the tools. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
LĐK
LĐK (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I will combat vandalism on Wikidata, as I am familiar with the rollback. LĐK (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you have a great experience of fighting vandalism in your home-wiki. But why did your never work in this field here on Wikidata? At least I did not find any reverting edits by you (did I look for them badly?). --Wolverène (talk) 07:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Granted. Despite modest contributions for Wikidata, I see you are a trusted member of the local community, so there is nothing wrong in giving you the permission. You are encouraged to work just more actively here. Good luck! --Wolverène (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
PotsdamLamb
PotsdamLamb (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Having fought vandalism for years on en wiki and simple wiki and graduating CVU and never losing the right for misuse, I would like to start expanding my rollback work to wikidata where I do some work as well. I have been blocked on en wiki for years for a long disturbing twisted story and was blocked on simple for being incivil, but have earned my way back on it and am doing even better in the areas where I was not. Again, did not lose my rollback rights for any misuse. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 21:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose seems to be rather problematic user. Still indef block in enwiki Estopedist1 (talk) 12:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1 That issue was a very long time ago and it is a very convoluted story. I do all my work on Simple, Data, venturing into simple wiktionary. I am no where near a problematic user. I am actually a mentor on simple with rollback rights since I started there in 2001. You are more than welcome to Vermont as she can give you the lowdown on the issue which still bothers both of us to this day for what was said to me that when I said it back I got indefinitely blocked. I was just released off of a little over a year block on simple due to an ongoing battle with a certain admin. Since I’ve been back I’ve been called names, told to basically f*** off, has users trying to get me banned on simple (come to find out that they were puppets). I’ve dealt a lot with what has happened since. BTW Vermont was the one who issued the block. She also helps me understand things better. If you have any questions, I leads ping me so I get the notification. As a side note, a global stew granted me ipexempt here on wd and we do not know each other or even chat unless it’s GRP blowing up our wiki. I hope you reconsider. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 11:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have returned constructively to simplewiki, though I would ask that you recognize that other contributors may be reluctant to grant userrights given your enwiki block. Vermont (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vermont Thanks, so basically, I will never get it. Thanks for the heads-up. I won't ask for it anywhere else then and just focus on simple as this is a common theme I have noticed. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 20:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- It will be great if you will keep on contributing, especially focusing on combating the vandalism on Wikidata. Nothing is totally hopeless if you continue working in a constructive way. --Wolverène (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vermont Thanks, so basically, I will never get it. Thanks for the heads-up. I won't ask for it anywhere else then and just focus on simple as this is a common theme I have noticed. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 20:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have returned constructively to simplewiki, though I would ask that you recognize that other contributors may be reluctant to grant userrights given your enwiki block. Vermont (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done but without prejudice for the future; Please take the advice by others above into account. I would suggest that you do some counter-vandalism work on Wikidata before re-applying. Undo/restore, or maybe TwinkleGlobal could be useful to you until then. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 16:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1 That issue was a very long time ago and it is a very convoluted story. I do all my work on Simple, Data, venturing into simple wiktionary. I am no where near a problematic user. I am actually a mentor on simple with rollback rights since I started there in 2001. You are more than welcome to Vermont as she can give you the lowdown on the issue which still bothers both of us to this day for what was said to me that when I said it back I got indefinitely blocked. I was just released off of a little over a year block on simple due to an ongoing battle with a certain admin. Since I’ve been back I’ve been called names, told to basically f*** off, has users trying to get me banned on simple (come to find out that they were puppets). I’ve dealt a lot with what has happened since. BTW Vermont was the one who issued the block. She also helps me understand things better. If you have any questions, I leads ping me so I get the notification. As a side note, a global stew granted me ipexempt here on wd and we do not know each other or even chat unless it’s GRP blowing up our wiki. I hope you reconsider. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 11:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)