Wikidata talk:Database reports/Constraint violations/P225

Constraint violation of taxon name (P225) View with SQID

Archive

List

edit

cf. @Wikispecies

genera

edit

There are over five thousand generic names that are used both under the ICZN and the ICNafp, some of these are:

subgenera

edit

There are also a number of entries of a genus and a subgenus (that is, "coordinate" names, with the same spelling, same date, same type. Only for animals):

species

edit

There is also a handful of species:

asymmetrical

edit

different taxonomies

edit

The same name used for differently circumscribed taxa:

known problem cases (unresolved)

edit

weird

edit

weird, but different

edit

violations of Wikipedia policy (at least 50% fictitious taxa)

edit

violations

first heading

edit

Add them simply that way. --Succu (talk) 10:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

It may be that this would work very well, but readability is very poor. - Brya (talk) 11:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hemihomonyms?

edit

@Brya, Succu: Would it be useful to record them directly via a new property that could be named "hemihomonym"? [1] There is the Hemihomonyms database, but maybe we could generate our own one. Korg (talk) 01:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

These are not hemihomonyms, but rather potential combinations. - Brya (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I see, but are there still real hemihomonyms or the concept is questionable? Maybe you're referrring to their conditional nature, so names shouldn't be labelled as such? Korg (talk) 11:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes and no. There is no formal concept "hemihomonym", but the term is in informal use. IIRC there are actually two different informal concepts "hemihomonym" (or rather, two areas where they occur) ... - Brya (talk) 16:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the clarification. Korg (talk) 21:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Return to the project page "Database reports/Constraint violations/P225".