Category talk:Wikidata protected edit requests
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kolja21 in topic Deprecated GND ID
Deprecated GND ID edit
Because of neverending (?) RFC Wikidata:Requests for comment/Handling of stored IDs after they've been deleted or redirected in the external database we have long-pending (over three months) protected edit requests related to deprecated GND ID. To clean up this category, I put these canceled protected edit requests here. The common problem was that user:Kolja21 removed deprecated/redirected GND IDs. I think that the harm is minimal (or even absent) if we don't revert these edits. But ultimate decision may be made if RFC will be ended.
- Talk:Q109516
- Talk:Q109554
- Talk:Q114458
- Talk:Q143499
- Talk:Q149872
- Talk:Q15520833
- Talk:Q15791039
- Talk:Q168082
- Talk:Q168905
- Talk:Q176916
- Talk:Q18507694
- Talk:Q19910726
- Talk:Q21287527
- Talk:Q217365
- Talk:Q270363
- Talk:Q280304
- Talk:Q3329639
- Talk:Q37158
- Talk:Q454871
- Talk:Q534585
- Talk:Q546310
- Talk:Q56071439
- Talk:Q61432
- Talk:Q63520
- Talk:Q65561238
- Talk:Q689374
- Talk:Q81845204
- Talk:Q91108
- Talk:Q95062
Estopedist1 (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the list. Like explained here the corrections were part of maintenance work. We had many and long discussions about that topic (mostly in German). --Kolja21 (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry Kolja21, but your constant statement that your deletions are for maintenance is a myth. You've been shown plenty of other avenues to choose from rather than deleting the outdated or redirected identifiers. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please stop accusing me of randomly deleting identifiers. 17 years of maintenance work is not a myth (see de:Wikipedia:GND/Fehlermeldung). I've marked hundreds of redirects with "deprecated rank" (without deleting them) and of cause there are cases where withdrawn identifiers are kept (example: Q55194458#P227). Last not least: You are not interested in maintenance work for authority control data. May I remind you that the reason you started these discussions was to prove that you were unfairly blocked. --Kolja21 (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry Kolja21, but your constant statement that your deletions are for maintenance is a myth. You've been shown plenty of other avenues to choose from rather than deleting the outdated or redirected identifiers. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: To be honest I don't know if this is the right place to discuss the topic. I would have raised the issue again on Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard or Wikidata:Project chat after I had carried out the other edit requests, because the RFD speaks a clear language and, based on this, action must finally be taken. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- To be honest you haven't changed. Flooding the talk pages speaks volumes. We don't need to have these discussions again. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)