Hello @Gymnicus, if it is not a mistake - then - for what reason did you withdraw corrections of Q118085547 and restore the incorrect version of that item?
Gymnicus
Joined 4 December 2020
Hi,
About Special:Diff/2122306884, you are absolutely right, nature de l’élément (P31) is not the right qualifier. But Allemagne (Q183) is the only country (and other places) of the world where the item is modeled like this right now ; that's why, for consistency sake, I came back to the current modeling. I won't revert you but I don't have time either to correct all the other items, could you do it?
Ping @BrokenSegue: who noticed the inconsistency also (for instance on Wikidata:WikiProject Heads of state and government/lists/current heads which expect nature de l’élément (P31) right now, but there is probably many other cases).
Cheers,
Because I have the time and desire at the moment, I changed the qualifier ist ein(e) (P31)Emoji-Regional-Indikator-Sequenz (Q28840786) to Objekt fungiert als (P3831)Emoji-Regional-Indikator-Sequenz (Q28840786) for all data objects.
Thanks a lot, that's way better like that.
What is your rationale for this revert: Special:Diff/2120047948? As I already said in edit summary, both "Isabella" and "Isabella küla" are valid name variants, both exist in reliable Estonian-language sources, and hence should given as separate name variants here on Wikidata as well. Commonly, on maps, traffic signs etc., name variants of Estonian settlements exclude the generic term ("küla", "linn" etc.), and hence Wikidata labels also have been harmonized to use these more simple name variants. Given item now for some reason doesn't follow this pattern.
Note that et.wikipedia article is titled "Isabella küla" only for disambiguation purpose (there are articles about other Isabellas, too). This is specific to Wikipedia. On Wikidata it is not needed to disambiguate labels (see Help:Label#Labels can be ambiguous).
Your English alias "Isabella, Estonia", as I already said in edit summary, is also a disambiguated article title, specific to Wikipedia. It isn't an actual name variant which can be found in reliable English-language sources for this Estonian village, and hence it is misleading to provide this as an alternative name (alias).
Hallo Gymnicus, die GND für Korpuslinguistik (Q865083) wurde aus deWP importiert. Du behauptest, sie beziehe sich auf ein anderes Objekt, hast die GND in Wikipedia aber stehen lassen und gleichzeitig bei Textkorpus (Q461183) als alternativer Name "Korpuslinguistik" eingefügt. Damit widersprechen sich die Angaben. Bibliotheken arbeiten mit de:Quasisynonymen, d.h. GND 4165338-5 gilt für BEIDE Datenobjekte. Bitte auch richtig zitieren: Wenn in GND 4165338-5 als Ansetzungsform "Korpus <Linguistik>" steht, kannst du nicht einfach den Zusatz "Linguistik" streichen.
Kein Antwort, aber du tauchst weiter auf in den Fehlerlisten auf. Aus "Intendant / Theater" hast du "Intendant" gemacht. Das ist mehrdeutung und daher falsch! Außerdem gibst du an: teilt Identifikator mit "Theaterleiter". Dort, unter Theaterleiter (Q1776724), aber behauptest du das Gegenteil.
Please don't force existence of once deleted unnotable combined WD items. Regards, —Mykhal (talk) 14:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
I see you reverted change in Q7930989 and now every city and town is again instance of 'census subdivision of Canada'. That's pure non-sense. Cities and town around the world do not belong to Canada. If it was census subdivision than maybe but this claim is really wrong.
Can you explain why you insist on marking every city and town around the world Q7930989 as subclass of city 'census subdivision of Canada' Q17457753?
I see you edited Q5340858 and Q20532037, they are the same thing. I moved the uzlink value from Q20532037 to Q5340858. Need to remove Q20532037
Hi! I don't quite understand this edit. Both desambiguation pages regard en:article in one shape or form. No conflicting iw links have been detected. This object has the Property:P460 pointing to Q111478. What are your argument against joining these objects together?
No reply in six days? Do you think the issue is important?
Dear Gymnicus,
I hope you are doing well,
I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I am working on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.
I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits.
Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published in a research venue.
The experiment should take no more than 15 minutes, and it will be held next week.
If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfA1wfdBfCRlcG3WhDyc-V8lzgPNx3fDFCNXkyn4CSwahXZ_A/viewform?usp=sf_link
Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.
For more information about my project, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa
In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.
Thank you for considering taking part in this research.
Regards
Hello Gymnicus! Why did you do this? Why wasn't the original version good? Thanks. Pallor (vitalap) 16:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Hungarian personal names are in the Eastern names order (see also: en:Personal_name#Eastern_name_order)
For example: Anita Harag (Q101095943)
Hungarian version: Harag Anita. Family name: Harag forename: Anita. German version: Anita Harag
Other examples:
Éva Sándorné Sipos (Q56033729) Hungarian: Sándorné Sipos Éva, German: Éva Sándorné Sipos Andrea Tompa (Q16523392) Hungarian: Tompa Andrea, German: Andrea Tompa
etc.
I recommend you to use the nameGuzzler tool nameGuzzler (Q23727110) , which allows you to handle all language name variations at once without overwriting the existing name variation.
Also, I would like to point out that the birth and death dates are not accidentally added to the beginning of the description, so you don't need to change them either.
I ask you to correct all the incorrectly changed name variations, and also the transferred birth (death) data.