Property talk:P6659

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dealerofsalvation in topic different from LUBW Protected Area No (P5965) ?

Documentation

Baden-Württemberg protected area ID
identifier for nature and landscape protected areas in Baden-Württemberg (Germany), issued by the Landesanstalt für Umwelt Baden-Württemberg
Associated itemLandesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg (Q1802082)
Data typeExternal identifier
DomainLandschaftsschutzgebiet (Q21503788) or nature reserve (Q179049)
Allowed values[1-4]\.\d+(\.\d+)*
ExampleWeiher nördlich Wilfingen (Q62069654) → 4.26.028
Seegrund (Q62069368) → 2.15.039
Listhof (Q1971141) → 4.297
Hamberg (Q62026845) → 2.139
Sourcehttp://udo.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/public/pages/map/default/index.xhtml
Related to country  Germany (Q183) (See 347 others) (Baden-Württemberg (Q985))
See alsoBavarian protected area ID (P6230), Mecklenburg-Vorpommern protected area ID (P6478), Berlin protected area ID (P6280), Saxony-Anhalt protected area ID (P6560), Saxony protected area ID (P6700), LUBW Protected Area No (P5965)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total2,515
Main statement2,51199.8% of uses
Qualifier40.2% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6659#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6659#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Format “[1-4]\.\d+(\.\d+)?: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6659#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “country (P17): Germany (Q183): Items with this property should also have “country (P17): Germany (Q183)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6659#Item P17, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL
Item “instance of (P31): Items with this property should also have “instance of (P31)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6659#Item P31, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6659#Entity types

different from LUBW Protected Area No (P5965) ? edit

@Derzno, GPSLeo, Blech, PKM, Ordercrazy, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: IMHo it makes sense to explicitly point out that this identifier is not a duplicate of LUBW Protected Area No (P5965), though it might seem so at first glance to people not familiar with the topic. I tried to add different from (P1889) to this property, but it seems this cannot be applied here. Is there a more suitable way to do that? --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 15:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I used the LUBW selector [1] to take a closer look at the "Steckbriefe" (Data sheets) from LUBW for Wikidata items having a Baden-Württemberg protected area ID (P6659) and for those having a LUBW Protected Area No (P5965). Samples:

In either case, they call the identifier "Schutzgebiets-Nr.", it's just that they use different formats for

So these IDs can be regarded as disjoint. From all of this, I conclude these properties are the same and I suggest merging these two properties into one (extending the regexp to allow both number formats). Thoughts? --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 18:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P6659" page.