(Q24185986)

English

Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews

scientific article

In more languages

edit

Statements

0 references

1 reference

1 reference

0 references

Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews (English)

0 references

1 reference

4

0 references

Jørn Wetterslev

series ordinal

2

0 references

Janus C Jakobsen

object named as

Janus C Jakobsen

series ordinal

1

0 references

Theis Lange

object named as

Theis Lange

series ordinal

3

0 references

publication date

18 March 2016

0 references

published in

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

0 references

cites work

Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Meta-analysis of clinical trial safety data in a drug development program: answers to frequently asked questions

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Teaching hypothesis tests--time for significant change?

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Why the P-value culture is bad and confidence intervals a better alternative

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

The need for large-scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses, or subgroup analyses

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

Discordance between meta-analyses and large-scale randomized, controlled trials. Examples from the management of acute myocardial infarction

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

21 January 2018

An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

How to obtain the confidence interval from a P value

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Obtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trials

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.ED000111

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Identifiers

DOI

10.1002/14651858.ED000111

0 references

PubMed publication ID

27030037

0 references

(Q24185986)

Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)