(Q24288722)

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

19 March 2017

2 references

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

19 March 2017

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression

6 April 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

The effectiveness of the peer review process: inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

An examination of sources of peer-review bias

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Peer review interrater concordance of scientific abstracts: a study of anesthesiology subspecialty and component societies

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Interrater reliability in grading abstracts for the orthopaedic trauma association.

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Reliability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and the Lancet

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression.

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

A worldwide assessment of medical journal editors' practices and needs--results of a survey by the World Association of Medical Editors.

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

The reliability of peer assessments. A meta-analysis

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded?

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality?

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Agreement among reviewers of review articles

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Interrater reliability of 1987-1991 Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport reviews

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

A statistical analysis of reviewer agreement and bias in evaluating medical abstracts

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

Peer Review Interrater Reliability of Scientific Abstracts: A Study of an Anesthesia Subspecialty Society

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3001856

The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation

30 May 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Where now for meta-analysis?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

How masked is the "masked peer review" of abstracts submitted to international medical conferences?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta-Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Is Peer Review a Game of Chance?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

An Evaluation of the Peer Review Process atAngewandte Chemie

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

The reliability of peer review in anthrozoology

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Interjudgmental reliability of reviews for the Journal of Educational Psychology

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Peer review and editorial decision-making

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special report

1 reference

12 December 2020

Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods

1 reference

12 December 2020

Agreement among reviewers

1 reference

12 December 2020

Introduction to Meta-Analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

7 January 2021

Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

7 January 2021

Contributions of reviewer judgements to editorial decision-making for the Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science: 1985–1986

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

7 January 2021

Contrasting Conventional with Multi-Level Modeling Approaches to Meta-Analysis: Expectation Consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0014331

7 January 2021

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0014331

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

3163918

ADS bibcode

2010PLoSO...514331B

0 references

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

3163918

1 reference