(Q33810540)

29 July 2017

1 reference

title

Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem (English)

1 reference

29 July 2017

0 references

1 reference

Peter Bacchetti

1

1 reference

29 July 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 May 2002

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference

29 July 2017

volume

324

1 reference

29 July 2017

issue

7348

1 reference

29 July 2017

page(s)

1271-1273

1 reference

Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?

29 July 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: caveat lector?

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Small clinical trials: are they all bad?

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Statistical reviewing for medical journals.

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators

30 October 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Multiple comparisons, explained

30 October 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1123222

Pros and cons of open peer review

30 October 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12028986

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

The importance of reviewers

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12028986

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12028986

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1136/BMJ.324.7348.1271

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference