(Q34420202)

2 August 2017

0 references

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review (English)

1 reference

cost-effectiveness analysis

2 August 2017

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

colorectal cancer screening

1 reference

Paul Hanly

1

1 reference

2 August 2017

Mairead Skally

series ordinal

2

1 reference

2 August 2017

Helen Fenlon

series ordinal

3

1 reference

2 August 2017

Linda Sharp

series ordinal

4

1 reference

2 August 2017

publication date

24 September 2012

1 reference

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

2 August 2017

published in

1 reference

2 August 2017

volume

28

1 reference

2 August 2017

issue

4

1 reference

2 August 2017

page(s)

415-423

1 reference

The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries

2 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

CT colonography: results and limitations

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

The cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening: risks and benefits

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Computed tomographic colonography: clinical value

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Impact of whole-body CT screening on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Patient experiences of colonoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography: a qualitative study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography or fecal blood tests

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

7 January 2021

Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

7 January 2021

CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

7 January 2021

Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

7 January 2021

CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462312000542

7 January 2021

10.1017/S0266462312000542

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference