(Q53485684)

14 May 2018

title

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. (English)

1 reference

14 May 2018

cost-effectiveness analysis

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

colorectal cancer screening

1 reference

1 reference

Angelo Zullo

4

0 references

Andrea Laghi

object named as

Andrea Laghi

3

0 references

Cesare Hassan

2

object named as

Cesare Hassan

1 reference

14 May 2018

author name string

Perry J Pickhardt

1

1 reference

14 May 2018

David H Kim

5

1 reference

14 May 2018

Sergio Morini

6

1 reference

14 May 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 June 2007

1 reference

14 May 2018

published in

Cancer

1 reference

14 May 2018

volume

109

1 reference

14 May 2018

issue

11

1 reference

14 May 2018

page(s)

2213-2221

1 reference

14 May 2018

Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Cancer statistics, 2006

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

AGA future trends report: CT colonography

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

PRO: Patients with polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

CON: Immediate colonoscopy is not necessary in patients who have polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementation.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Growth of colorectal polyps: recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps of less than 10 mm, 1 year after detection

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

A case-cohort study for the disease natural history of adenoma-carcinoma and de novo carcinoma and surveillance of colon and rectum after polypectomy: implication for efficacy of colonoscopy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

The role of sigmoidoscopy for asymptomatic patients. Results of three annual screening sigmoidoscopies, polypectomy, and subsequent surveillance colonoscopy in a primary-care setting.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.22668

7 January 2021

Identifiers

DOI

10.1002/CNCR.22668

1 reference

14 May 2018

PubMed ID

17455218

1 reference

14 May 2018