(Q34925022)

5 August 2017

1 reference

title

How to critically appraise an article (English)

1 reference

5 August 2017

Michael J. Solomon

2

0 references

author name string

J. M. Young

series ordinal

1

object named as

Jane M. Young

1 reference

5 August 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

20 January 2009

1 reference

full work available at URL

5 August 2017

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1041.1168&rep=rep1&type=pdf

archive URL

http://web.archive.org/web/20210514173216/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1041.1168&rep=rep1&type=pdf

archive date

14 May 2021

0 references

published in

Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

1 reference

5 August 2017

volume

6

1 reference

5 August 2017

issue

2

1 reference

5 August 2017

page(s)

82-91

1 reference

Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice

5 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Lessons learned from a prospective meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Assessing bias in case-control studies. Proper selection of cases and controls

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Economic evaluation: an introduction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Economics notes: types of economic evaluation

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Good enough: a primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

Critical appraisal for public health: a new checklist

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

1 reference

12 December 2020

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration

1 reference

12 December 2020

Improving the evidence base in surgery: sources of bias in surgical studies.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement

1 reference

12 December 2020

Ethical issues concerning the relationships between medical practitioners and the pharmaceutical industry

1 reference

12 December 2020

Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design

1 reference

12 December 2020

Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

1 reference

12 December 2020

Are claims of equivalency in digestive diseases trials supported by the evidence?☆

1 reference

12 December 2020

Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review

1 reference

12 December 2020

READER: an acronym to aid critical reading by general practitioners.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

1 reference

12 December 2020

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group

1 reference

12 December 2020

Potential research participants' views regarding researcher and institutional financial conflicts of interest

1 reference

12 December 2020

Conflict-of-interest policies for investigators in clinical trials

1 reference

12 December 2020

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

1 reference

12 December 2020

Improving the evidence-base in surgery: evaluating surgical effectiveness.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Information overload: what's behind it, what's beyond it?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

1 reference

12 December 2020

Research, ethics and conflicts of interest

1 reference

12 December 2020

Subverting randomization in controlled trials.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding

1 reference

12 December 2020

Publication bias in clinical research

1 reference

12 December 2020

Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research

1 reference

12 December 2020

Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding

1 reference

12 December 2020

Bioethics for clinicians: 17. Conflict of interest in research, education and patient care

1 reference

12 December 2020

Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine

1 reference

12 December 2020

Assessing the Quality of Reports of Systematic Reviews: The QUOROM Statement Compared to Other Tools

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2FNCPGASTHEP1331

7 January 2021

inferred from DOI database lookup

Identifiers

DOI

10.1038/NCPGASTHEP1331

1 reference

5 August 2017

1 reference