(Q35076003)

6 August 2017

0 references

Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. (English)

1 reference

6 August 2017

1 reference

1 reference

4

Patrick M M Bossuyt

1 reference

6 August 2017

René Spijker

3

0 references

Lotty Hooft

series ordinal

5

object named as

Lotty Hooft

1 reference

6 August 2017

1

Daniël A Korevaar

1 reference

6 August 2017

W Annefloor van Enst

2

1 reference

6 August 2017

language of work or name

1 reference

24 December 2013

1 reference

6 August 2017

published in

Evidence-Based Medicine

1 reference

6 August 2017

volume

19

1 reference

6 August 2017

issue

2

1 reference

6 August 2017

page(s)

47-54

1 reference

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy

6 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication--before-and-after study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: application of the STARD criteria

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Quality and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in TB, HIV and malaria: evaluation using QUADAS and STARD standards

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Quality of reporting of orthopaedic diagnostic accuracy studies is suboptimal

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

Reporting the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative 10 years on.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2FEB-2013-101637

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1136/EB-2013-101637

1 reference

release_en7cdzlzwncb7hoc3nym45ve3i

6 August 2017

Fatcat ID

1 reference

Fatcat

https://api.fatcat.wiki/v0/release/en7cdzlzwncb7hoc3nym45ve3i

mapped directly with Wikidata item

24 November 2022

based on heuristic

1 reference