(Q35943880)

English

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors

scientific article

In more languages

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

systematic review

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

2

object named as

Erik von Elm

0 references

author name string

Nadia Elia

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Alexandra Chatagner

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Daniel M Pöpping

4

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Martin R Tramèr

5

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

publication date

2 March 2016

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

6

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

e010442

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Impact of contacting study authors to obtain additional data for systematic reviews: diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatic fibrosis

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of β-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth--and its violations

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Differences in reporting of analyses in internal company documents versus published trial reports: comparisons in industry-sponsored trials in off-label uses of gabapentin

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Industry sponsorship and research outcome

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

The role of Cochrane Review authors in exposing research and publication misconduct

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Ethics in systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: systematic review of experimental studies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

What have we learnt from Vioxx?

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Scientists behaving badly

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Retrieval of missing data for meta-analysis: a practical example

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Why should clinical trials be registered?

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

24 September 2018

The Boldt debacle

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

24 September 2018

Identifiers

10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-010442

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

PMC publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

ResearchGate publication ID

0 references

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q35943880&oldid=1618024957"