(Q35990825)

11 August 2017

title

Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal (English)

1 reference

11 August 2017

1 reference

Linda Snell

1

1 reference

11 August 2017

John Spencer

series ordinal

2

1 reference

11 August 2017

publication date

1 January 2005

1 reference

11 August 2017

1 reference

11 August 2017

volume

39

1 reference

11 August 2017

issue

1

1 reference

11 August 2017

page(s)

90-97

1 reference

What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?

11 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

Peer review: thinking the unthinkable

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

Peer review: reform or revolution?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

21 January 2018

2 references

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1136/BMJ.38023.700775.AE

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1111/J.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1111/J.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

Identifiers

DOI

10.1111/J.1365-2929.2004.02026.X

1 reference

11 August 2017

1 reference