(Q37153685)

English

Comparison of the performance of rapid prescreening, 10% random review, and clinical risk criteria as methods of internal quality control in cervical cytopathology

scientific article published on June 2008

In more languages

default values for all languages

No label defined

No description defined

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Comparison of the performance of rapid prescreening, 10% random review, and clinical risk criteria as methods of internal quality control in cervical cytopathology (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

quality control

0 references

author name string

Suelene B N Tavares

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Nadja L Alves de Sousa

2

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Edna J C Manrique

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Zair B Pinheiro de Albuquerque

4

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Luiz C Zeferino

5

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Rita G Amaral

6

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

language of work or name

0 references

publication date

1 June 2008

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

114

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

165-170

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Evaluation of the 10% rescreen of negative gynecologic smears as a quality assurance measure

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Rapid screening: a comparative study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of negative cervical smears as a quality assurance measure

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Rescreening in cervical cytology for quality control. When bad data is worse than no data or what works, what doesn't, and why.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method in a high-risk population

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

100% rapid rescreening for quality assurance in a quality control program in a public health cytologic laboratory

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Cervical-cancer screening beyond the year 2000

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

21 January 2018

Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Negative cervical smears before CIN 3/carcinoma. Reevaluation with the PAPNET Testing System

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

One hundred percent thorough quality control rescreening of liquid-based monolayers in cervicovaginal cytopathology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Analysis of error in calculating the false-negative rate in the interpretation of cervicovaginal smears: the need to review abnormal cases

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performance

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Rescreening for quality control in cytology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Quality assurance in cervical smears: 100% rapid rescreening vs. 10% random rescreening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Assessing the costs and benefits of alternative rescreening strategies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Percentages of cervical cytologic diagnoses as a quality assurance method

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Rapid pre‐screening: a validated quality assurance measure in cervical cytology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.23509

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Identifiers

10.1002/CNCR.23509

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

18 August 2017

ResearchGate publication ID

0 references

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q37153685&oldid=2214890371"