(Q37918663)

25 August 2017

Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study (English)

1 reference

25 August 2017

1 reference

9

1 reference

25 August 2017

Yen-Fu Chen

8

0 references

Richard Holland

object named as

Richard Holland

7

0 references

Jonathan Deeks

object named as

Jonathan J Deeks

10

0 references

Yoon K Loke

4

object named as

Yoon K Loke

1 reference

25 August 2017

Fujian Song

1

1 reference

25 August 2017

Tengbin Xiong

2

1 reference

25 August 2017

Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke

3

1 reference

25 August 2017

Alex J Sutton

5

1 reference

25 August 2017

Alison J Eastwood

6

1 reference

25 August 2017

Doug G Altman

11

1 reference

25 August 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

16 August 2011

1 reference

25 August 2017

1 reference

25 August 2017

343

1 reference

25 August 2017

d4909

1 reference

Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality

25 August 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Direct versus indirect comparisons: a summary of the evidence

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Interventions for rosacea

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Indirect comparison in evaluating relative efficacy illustrated by antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses

6 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Evaluating novel agent effects in multiple-treatments meta-regression.

14 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Indirect comparison: relative risk fallacies and odds solution

1 September 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

A comparison of 15% azelaic acid gel and 0.75% metronidazole gel in the topical treatment of papulopustular rosacea: results of a randomized trial

1 September 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3156578

Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons

1 September 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21846695

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1136/BMJ.D4909

1 reference

25 August 2017

1 reference

25 August 2017

PubMed publication ID

21846695

1 reference