(Q37988889)

English

Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

scientific article published on 02 April 2012

In more languages

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

0 references

Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

systematic review

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

prostaglandin E2

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

Fabio Facchinetti

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

Cinzia Del Giovane

3

object named as

Cinzia Del Giovane

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

author name string

Francesca Fontanesi

2

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

publication date

2 April 2012

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

25

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

10

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

1965-1969

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3109%2F14767058.2012.668584

21 January 2018

Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3109%2F14767058.2012.668584

21 January 2018

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3109%2F14767058.2012.668584

21 January 2018

A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3109%2F14767058.2012.668584

21 January 2018

Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3109%2F14767058.2012.668584

21 January 2018

A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3109%2F14767058.2012.668584

21 January 2018

Identifiers

10.3109/14767058.2012.668584

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

26 August 2017

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q37988889&oldid=2177521133"