(Q38024960)

27 August 2017

Methodological and ethical quality of randomized controlled clinical trials in gastrointestinal surgery (English)

1 reference

27 August 2017

0 references

1 reference

Grégoire Moutel

2

0 references

Horace Roman

3

object named as

Horace Roman

1 reference

27 August 2017

Valérie Bridoux

1

1 reference

27 August 2017

Babak Kianifard

4

1 reference

27 August 2017

Francis Michot

5

1 reference

27 August 2017

Christian Herve

6

1 reference

27 August 2017

Jean-Jacques Tuech

7

1 reference

27 August 2017

10 July 2012

1 reference

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

27 August 2017

1 reference

27 August 2017

16

1 reference

27 August 2017

9

1 reference

27 August 2017

1758-1767

1 reference

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11605-012-1952-0

27 August 2017

0 references

cites work

Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Methodological quality and reporting of ethical requirements in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Adherence to published standards of reporting: a comparison of placebo-controlled trials published in English or German.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Disclosure to the reader of institutional review board approval and informed consent.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Methodological quality and reporting of ethical requirements in phase III cancer trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Methodological and ethical aspects of randomized controlled clinical trials in minors with malignant diseases

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Failure to report ethical approval in child health research: review of published papers

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading anesthesia journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Is general thoracic surgical practice evidence based?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a survey of 13 randomly selected journals from mainland China

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic review.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Standards to improve the reporting of clinical trials in acupuncture

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Informed consent in biomedical studies on aging: survey of four journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Cancer registries fear collapse. Need for patient consent for cancer registration creates logistical nightmare

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Ethical review of research involving human subjects: when and why is IRB review necessary?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Protecting research participants

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Reporting approval by research ethics committees and subjects' consent in human resuscitation research.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Informed Consent and Approval by Institutional Review Boards in Published Reports on Clinical Trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1952-0

Methodological and ethical quality in phase III--breast cancer trials.

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Consensus Statement on the Adoption of the COPE Guidelines

1 reference

12 December 2020

The ethics of early stopping rules: who is protecting whom?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Rights involve responsibilities for patients

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized controlled trials in surgery.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Ethical assessment of clinical research publications

1 reference

12 December 2020

Reporting ethical protections in physical therapy research.

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Clinical trials in the elderly: ethical and methodologic considerations]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.

1 reference

12 December 2020

The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist

1 reference

12 December 2020

Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the Fracture Care Literature

1 reference

12 December 2020

Ethics requirements and impact factor

1 reference

COCI

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1136/MEDETHICS-2011-100174

10.1007/S11605-012-1952-0

13 November 2021

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

27 August 2017

1 reference