(Q39017150)

8 September 2017

title

Equipoise: a case study of the views of clinicians involved in two neonatal trials (English)

1 reference

8 September 2017

2

Diana Elbourne

1 reference

8 September 2017

Jo Garcia

1

1 reference

8 September 2017

Claire Snowdon

series ordinal

3

1 reference

8 September 2017

publication date

1 January 2004

1 reference

8 September 2017

1 reference

8 September 2017

volume

1

1 reference

8 September 2017

issue

2

1 reference

8 September 2017

page(s)

170-178

1 reference

Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research

8 September 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

The ethics of randomization

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Ethics of clinical trials from a bayesian and decision analytic perspective: whose equipoise is it anyway?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Evidence, belief, and action: the failure of equipoise to resolve the ethical tension in the randomized clinical trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

The use of equipoise in clinical trials.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. Clinical equipoise and the uncertainty principles both require further scrutiny

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Integrating conflicting professional roles: physician participation in randomized clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Clinical trials -- a brave new partnership: a response to Mrs. Thornton

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Redressing the balance--the ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomised clinical trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1191%2F1740774504CN020XX

10.1191/1740774504CN020XX

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

8 September 2017

1 reference