(Q44984775)

8 December 2017

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis (English)

1 reference

8 December 2017

3

1 reference

8 December 2017

James R Carpenter

2

0 references

author name string

Gerta Rücker

series ordinal

1

1 reference

8 December 2017

14 January 2011

1 reference

8 December 2017

1 reference

8 December 2017

53

1 reference

8 December 2017

2

1 reference

8 December 2017

351-368

1 reference

PubMed ID

21374698

maintained by WikiProject

8 December 2017

WikiProject Mathematics

0 references

cites work

Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Publication bias in clinical research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

The demise of the randomised controlled trial: bibliometric study of the German-language health care literature, 1948 to 2004

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Citation bias of hepato-biliary randomized clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

The case of the misleading funnel plot

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Quantitative systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Assessing publication bias in meta-analyses in the presence of between-study heterogeneity

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Are large trials less reliable than small trials?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Analysing the relationship between treatment effect and underlying risk in meta-analysis: comparison and development of approaches.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

Could It Be Better to Discard 90% of the Data? A Statistical Paradox

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBIMJ.201000151

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1002/BIMJ.201000151

1 reference

8 December 2017

1 reference

PubMed ID

21374698