(Q48649285)

13 February 2018

title

Clinical ethics committees in Norway: what do they do, and does it make a difference? (English)

1 reference

13 February 2018

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

2

Reidar Pedersen

1 reference

13 February 2018

Reidun Førde

series ordinal

1

object named as

Reidun Førde

1 reference

13 February 2018

publication date

1 July 2011

1 reference

13 February 2018

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

published in

1 reference

13 February 2018

volume

20

1 reference

13 February 2018

issue

3

1 reference

13 February 2018

page(s)

389-395

1 reference

13 February 2018

Clinicians' evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study.

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0963180111000077

Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: the experiences of nine clinical ethics committees

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0963180111000077

Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0963180111000077

Criteria for determining the appropriate method for an ethics consultation

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0963180111000077

inferred from DOI database lookup

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0963180111000077

inferred from DOI database lookup

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

Ethics committees identify four key factors for success

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0963180111000077

inferred from DOI database lookup

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1017/S0963180111000077

1 reference

13 February 2018

1 reference

13 February 2018