(Q48855104)

16 February 2018

title

Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem. (English)

1 reference

16 February 2018

author

John Reynolds

9

1 reference

16 February 2018

Cecilia O'Kane

object named as

C O'Kane

5

0 references

Michael Jefford

object named as

M Jefford

1

0 references

author name string

L Mileshkin

2

1 reference

16 February 2018

J Matthews

3

1 reference

16 February 2018

H Raunow

4

1 reference

16 February 2018

T Cavicchiolo

6

1 reference

16 February 2018

H Brasier

7

1 reference

16 February 2018

M Anderson

8

1 reference

16 February 2018

publication date

23 February 2010

1 reference

16 February 2018

Supportive Care in Cancer

published in

1 reference

16 February 2018

volume

19

1 reference

16 February 2018

issue

3

1 reference

16 February 2018

page(s)

371-379

1 reference

16 February 2018

What makes clinical research ethical?

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

The hospital anxiety and depression scale

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Ethics of clinical trials.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Clinical cancer research--some aspects on doctors' attitudes to informing participants

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Improving informed consent: suggestions from parents of children with leukemia

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for clinicians.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Improving informed consent in clinical trials: successful piloting of a decision aid

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00520-010-0829-6

Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

How do doctors explain randomised clinical trials to their patients?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale

1 reference

12 December 2020

Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group

1 reference

12 December 2020

Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials

1 reference

12 December 2020

Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Ethics of clinical trials

1 reference

12 December 2020

Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1007/S00520-010-0829-6

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

16 February 2018

1 reference

16 February 2018